Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

iandhr

(6,852 posts) Wed Apr 2, 2014, 03:39 PM Apr 2014

3

There is one positive thing about the SCOUTS decision.

Agreed it is horrible.

Candidates have to disclose their donors unlike Super Packs. Maybe we can now shine light on who is funding the other side.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There is one positive thing about the SCOUTS decision. (Original Post) iandhr Apr 2014 OP

With Gerrymandering, how will that sunlight even matter? Nt Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #1

That would be totally meaningless to the average voter n/t doc03 Apr 2014 #2

Anansi1171

(793 posts)

1. With Gerrymandering, how will that sunlight even matter? Nt

Reply to iandhr (Original post)

Wed Apr 2, 2014, 03:56 PM

Apr 2014

doc03

(35,454 posts)

2. That would be totally meaningless to the average voter n/t

Reply to iandhr (Original post)

Wed Apr 2, 2014, 03:59 PM

Apr 2014

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is one positive thi...