General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Legendary Paul Ryan (Mitt who?)
The implosion of the Newt Gingrich presidential campaignthe first implosion, before the weird resurrection and inevitable second implosioncame because he used four words: right-wing social engineering. He used the phrase, last May, to describe the Republican budget designed by GOP icon Paul Ryan. It was as if he had urinated on Ronald Reagans grave. Party leaders rounded on him. In Iowa, an angry voter cornered him and fumed, in a video captured by Fox News that quickly went viral, What you did to Paul Ryan was unforgivable
Youre an embarrassment. Gingrich quickly apologized to Ryan, pledged his fealty to the document, and then, lending his confession an extracted-at-NKVD-gunpoint flavor, announced, Any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood. It was no use: Despite years of diligent service, his support among Republicans collapsed, his fellow partisans holding him in the low regard ordinarily reserved for liberals.
-snip-
To find a parallel to the way Ryan has so thoroughly seized control of the Republican agenda and identity, you have to go back at least to Gingrich in his nineties heyday, or possibly to Reagan. Yet Gingrich and Reagan rose to the national scene while cultivating an image as radicalsit was their battle scars, inflicted by the mainstream political Establishment, that lent them the credibility to speak for the conservative base. Ryan, by contrast, has achieved something much stranger: He has ascended to his present position aloft a chorus of acclaim from the corners of the Establishment that once greeted Gingrich and Reagan with loathing. He is the only politician revered as much by the mainstream media as by the tea party. By some measure, hes the most popular guy in Washington.
-snip-
This is not a moderate plan. As Robert Greenstein, a liberal budget analyst, summed up the proposal, It would likely produce the largest redistribution of income from the bottom to the top in modern U.S. history. And yet, Ryan has managed to sell it as something admirable, and something else entirely: a deficit-reduction plan. This is very clever. The centrist political Establishment, heavily represented among business leaders and the political media, considers it almost self-evident that the budget deficit (and not, say, mass unemployment or climate change) represents the singular policy threat of our time, and that bipartisan cooperation offers the sole avenue to address it. By casting his program as a solution to the debt crisis, by frequently conceding that Republicans as well as Democrats had failed in the past, and by inveighing against demagoguery, Ryan has presented himself as the acceptable Republican suitor the moderates had been longing for.
Whether Ryans plan even is a deficit-reduction plan is highly debatable. Ryan promises to eliminate trillions of dollars worth of tax deductions, but wont identify which ones. He proposes to sharply reduce government spending that isnt defense, Medicare (for the next decade, anyway), or Social Security, but much of that reduction is unspecified, and when Obama named some possible casualties, Ryan complained that those hypotheticals werent necessarily in his plan. Ryan is specific about two policies: massive cuts to income-tax rates, and very large cuts to government programs that aid the poor and medically vulnerable. You could call all this a deficit-reduction plan, but it would be more accurate to call it a plan to cut tax rates and spending on the poor and sick. Aside from a handful of exasperated commentators, like Paul Krugman, nobody does.
-more-
http://nymag.com/news/features/paul-ryan-2012-5/
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Where is Ronald Reagan's grave?