General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP Senate bill could kick 200,000 seniors off Social Security
The large transportation funding bill moving through the Senate would end Social Security benefits for 200,000 people who have an outstanding felony arrest warrantbut have never been convicted by a court, or have a warrant for violating probation or parole, according to disability rights advocates tracking the legislation.
The proposal, which surfaced late Tuesday, is at odds with recent Republican statements on the need to take up meaningful criminal justice reforms such as less harsh sentencing. It also sets a precedent of raiding Social Security funds for unrelated purposes, in this case transferring $2.3 billion for a range of transportation expenses.
The Senate will be voting on the proposal as part of package of amendments midday Wednesday, where 60 votes are needed to add it to the transportation bill. It also takes several billion from selling oil in the strategic petroleum reserve, Treasury bond interest rates, and U.S. customs fees.
There are two key issues here, said T.J. Sutcliffe, income and housing policy director for The Arc, a national disability rights organization. One is that the Social Security Trust Fund should not be used for unrelated purposes, no matter how important. And the other is Congress is considering cutting off benefits to 200,000 people who rely on Social Security and SSI [disability] benefits, who, in the case of arrest warrants have never been convicted.
The proposal surfaced in the Senate on Tuesday in a package of amendments (page 949, Section 52303) being added to a transportation bill. The Houses version of the bill only would have extended funds for several months, while the Senate is looking at a six-year proposalwhich becomes a vehicle for many other languishing bills.
Slightly different versions of a bill to punish people with outstanding felony warrants, or warrants for violating probation or parole, were introduced in both chambers. Disability and low-income advocates were quick to criticize the proposals, saying that they will punish people who rely on Social Security with little law enforcement benefit.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/07/senate-bill-could-kick-200000-seniors-off-social-security-if-they-have-an-arrest-warrant/
djean111
(14,255 posts)quite clearly that he is no Democrat. This, like TPP-related legislation, will absolutely define who I vote for, from now on.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)dsc
(52,172 posts)as well as recipients.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)It is costing SS an average of $30.00 per day, so incarcerate them and run the cost up to $200.00 per day. Plus in jail ALL medical costs fall on the tax payers. This is a proposal from a fiscally responsible party?
As it is they are getting a bargain. Keep F*ing around and "The Over The Hill Gang" won't just be a movie.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Only one word really describes Republicans. And that word is cruel.
It's the same mindset that allows cops to murder AAs for minor traffic infractions. This time it's the poor and disabled who just need to die. Too bad for those small time felons if they completely depend on SS for survival. Like everyone is saying, Obama must veto this abomination of a bill if it even passes the Senate.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)arresting them?
ladjf
(17,320 posts)after years of depriving American citizens of benefits that they have had for years. Why would any senior citizen vote for them?
madville
(7,413 posts)People unable to collect their Social Security benefits due to garnishment until their defaulted or old student loans are paid off.
CanonRay
(14,135 posts)Yeah, that's real helpful.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)will continue.