Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,601 posts)
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 08:55 AM Jul 2015

GOP Senate bill could kick 200,000 seniors off Social Security

The large transportation funding bill moving through the Senate would end Social Security benefits for 200,000 people who have an outstanding felony arrest warrant—but have never been convicted by a court, or have a warrant for violating probation or parole, according to disability rights advocates tracking the legislation.

The proposal, which surfaced late Tuesday, is at odds with recent Republican statements on the need to take up meaningful criminal justice reforms such as less harsh sentencing. It also sets a precedent of raiding Social Security funds for unrelated purposes, in this case transferring $2.3 billion for a range of transportation expenses.

The Senate will be voting on the proposal as part of package of amendments midday Wednesday, where 60 votes are needed to add it to the transportation bill. It also takes several billion from selling oil in the strategic petroleum reserve, Treasury bond interest rates, and U.S. customs fees.

“There are two key issues here,” said T.J. Sutcliffe, income and housing policy director for The Arc, a national disability rights organization. “One is that the Social Security Trust Fund should not be used for unrelated purposes, no matter how important. And the other is Congress is considering cutting off benefits to 200,000 people who rely on Social Security and SSI [disability] benefits, who, in the case of arrest warrants have never been convicted.”

The proposal surfaced in the Senate on Tuesday in a package of amendments (page 949, Section 52303) being added to a transportation bill. The House’s version of the bill only would have extended funds for several months, while the Senate is looking at a six-year proposal—which becomes a vehicle for many other languishing bills.

Slightly different versions of a bill to punish people with outstanding felony warrants, or warrants for violating probation or parole, were introduced in both chambers. Disability and low-income advocates were quick to criticize the proposals, saying that they will punish people who rely on Social Security with little law enforcement benefit.


http://www.rawstory.com/2015/07/senate-bill-could-kick-200000-seniors-off-social-security-if-they-have-an-arrest-warrant/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. If Obama does not veto any bill that cuts into Social Security funds, he will have shown
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:01 AM
Jul 2015

quite clearly that he is no Democrat. This, like TPP-related legislation, will absolutely define who I vote for, from now on.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
3. Stupidity runs deep.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:15 AM
Jul 2015

It is costing SS an average of $30.00 per day, so incarcerate them and run the cost up to $200.00 per day. Plus in jail ALL medical costs fall on the tax payers. This is a proposal from a fiscally responsible party?

As it is they are getting a bargain. Keep F*ing around and "The Over The Hill Gang" won't just be a movie.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
4. "Tough on Crime," "Tough on Crime" B.S.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:24 AM
Jul 2015

Only one word really describes Republicans. And that word is cruel.
It's the same mindset that allows cops to murder AAs for minor traffic infractions. This time it's the poor and disabled who just need to die. Too bad for those small time felons if they completely depend on SS for survival. Like everyone is saying, Obama must veto this abomination of a bill if it even passes the Senate.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
5. If the government knows the addresses of 200,000 people with felony arrest warrants, shouldn't it be
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:57 AM
Jul 2015

arresting them?

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
6. Greatest mystery to me is how the Republicans still get so many votes
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:25 AM
Jul 2015

after years of depriving American citizens of benefits that they have had for years. Why would any senior citizen vote for them?

madville

(7,413 posts)
7. In a generation or two the new crisis will be
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:29 AM
Jul 2015

People unable to collect their Social Security benefits due to garnishment until their defaulted or old student loans are paid off.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
10. Probably some of the warrants are minor, maybe get the warrants cleared and then Social Security
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 10:46 AM
Jul 2015

will continue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Senate bill could kic...