Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Adept

(6,402 posts)
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:33 AM Aug 2015

Duke University responds to ‘Fun Home’ controversy

“With a class of 1,750 new students from around the world, it would be impossible to find a single book that that did not challenge someone’s way of thinking,” Michael Schoenfeld, the university’s vice president for public affairs, said in a statement issued Monday. “We understand and respect that, but also hope that students will begin their time at Duke with open minds and a willingness to explore new ideas, whether they agree with them or not.”

Linkage

Good to see them standing by its inclusion and not quickly abandoning it. Some thought and effort is put into the selections afterall.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Blue_Adept

(6,402 posts)
1. Original complainer also walks back statement
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:34 AM
Aug 2015

Acts willy-nilly:

“Obviously, the purpose of Fun Home is literary and not pornographic in nature,” he told The Daily Beast. “However, I still hold that personally, it would be dishonoring to God for me to read it and to view it.”

Journeyman

(15,042 posts)
5. Reading. It's fundamental . . .
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 12:13 PM
Aug 2015
As with previous titles chosen by the Duke Common Experience Program, Fun Home isn’t required reading; there’s no grade given or documentation of a student’s participation. The program is designed to “give incoming students a shared intellectual experience with other members of their class” (the author is also invited to speak on campus).
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
6. No, no F will result.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 01:13 PM
Aug 2015

It was just suggested summer reading for incoming freshman.

Scary that they've got freshmen of this mentality.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
7. Kick the students out who won't read the thing.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 01:17 PM
Aug 2015

Biggest part of the education deal is learning new ideas.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
9. Anyone goony enough to think you can
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 02:12 PM
Aug 2015

dishonor an imaginary being by reading a book, required or not, has no business whatsoever at an elite school like Duke. None. Zip, zero, el zilcho. One of the reichwing diploma mills would be a far more appripriate place for a dimwit like this.

mnhtnbb

(31,410 posts)
10. Reminiscent of the controversy at UNC-Chapel Hill years ago
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 02:19 PM
Aug 2015

when, in 2002, a book about the Qur'an was on the suggested reading list for incoming freshman.

http://gazette.unc.edu/archives/02sep11/file.4.html

Three guesses who were the most vocal opponents?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Duke University responds ...