General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDuke University responds to ‘Fun Home’ controversy
With a class of 1,750 new students from around the world, it would be impossible to find a single book that that did not challenge someones way of thinking, Michael Schoenfeld, the universitys vice president for public affairs, said in a statement issued Monday. We understand and respect that, but also hope that students will begin their time at Duke with open minds and a willingness to explore new ideas, whether they agree with them or not.
Linkage
Good to see them standing by its inclusion and not quickly abandoning it. Some thought and effort is put into the selections afterall.
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)Acts willy-nilly:
Obviously, the purpose of Fun Home is literary and not pornographic in nature, he told The Daily Beast. However, I still hold that personally, it would be dishonoring to God for me to read it and to view it.
rurallib
(62,471 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Journeyman
(15,042 posts)ladyVet
(1,587 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)It was just suggested summer reading for incoming freshman.
Scary that they've got freshmen of this mentality.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Biggest part of the education deal is learning new ideas.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)dishonor an imaginary being by reading a book, required or not, has no business whatsoever at an elite school like Duke. None. Zip, zero, el zilcho. One of the reichwing diploma mills would be a far more appripriate place for a dimwit like this.
mnhtnbb
(31,410 posts)when, in 2002, a book about the Qur'an was on the suggested reading list for incoming freshman.
http://gazette.unc.edu/archives/02sep11/file.4.html
Three guesses who were the most vocal opponents?