General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCrybaby Capitalism: Greedy Corprats threatening Congress, demanding YUUGE tax breaks — or else!!!
Crybaby Capitalism is a festering epidemic in the US. And it isn't just Republicans coddling these greedy crybabies - it's also Democrats - even President Obama. DO YOU THINK HILLARY will put a stop to this? Will she even try? Of course no one can without CHANGING CONGRESS. Problem with changing Congress is this:
The bad news is that key leaders of the Democratic Party including the president are getting on board with Republicans, despite some talk about confronting income inequality. Influential Democrats intend to negotiate with Republican counterparts on the size and terms of post-facto tax forgiveness for Americas globalized companies. This is real money theyre talking about a giveaway of hundreds of billions.
Why havent voters heard about this from candidates? Because Republicans and Democrats both know it would make angry voters even angrier.
The major multinationals complain about a tax problem that most citizens would love to have for themselves: Thanks to a loophole in the tax code, the companies do not have to pay US taxes on profits they have earned in foreign countries until they bring the money home to American shores. Altogether, the globalized US companies have accumulated $2.1 trillion in untaxed profits, most of it parked in overseas tax havens.
The multinationals are waiting for Congress to forgive them their debts.
The facts are obscure but not secret. Even so, political reporters covering the candidates have shown little interest in alerting the public. I blame them for failing democracy.
That is, the US companies insist they wont bring the money home and pay the taxes they owe until Washington pols steeply reduce the rate to bargain-basement levels. Thats tax forgiveness on a grand scale. What the companies also demand is a permanently lowered tax rate on their future earnings. Some leading Republicans advocate eliminating taxation of foreign corporate income entirely.
THE REST (Bill Moyers):
http://billmoyers.com/story/democrats-and-republicans-are-quietly-planning-a-corporate-giveaway-to-the-tune-of-400-billion/
THE NATION:
http://www.thenation.com/article/democrats-and-republicans-are-quietly-planning-a-corporate-giveaway-to-the-tune-of-400-billion/
tazkcmo
(7,306 posts)This should be opposed by the entire voting population.
Triana
(22,666 posts)I say 'most' of the candidates because I think Sanders mentioned corp tax schemes ("inversions" tho maybe not in this particular context.
I'm guessing it goes unmentioned because they KNOW it will make people VERY angry and it's an election year.
Also, the same big corporations that control most of the media -- are some of the same that control Congress.
So most voters are of course in the dark about this.
It's going to cost us BILLIONS and all because Congress refuses to regulate corporations. Instead, it works the opposite way: Corporations control congress.
It's SO bassackwards. And us? We're SO screwed!
2naSalit
(86,920 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,499 posts)our MSM. This is the kind of thing, that when they want to cut SS or other social safety net protections, that really pisses me off. We don't have money for government by design so everything must be privatized. We don't tax those making the real money because they have their Republican and Democratic politicians write the rules to protect them!
We have plenty of $$$$$$$ for corprat welfare, but not enough for anyone or anything else - we have to starve seniors and let our infrastructure crumble so greedy corprats don't have to pay any taxes.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)They are like a big, strong ,"crazy" bull. Watch out for it's horns.
Orrex
(63,263 posts)They aren't hiring because the market is uncertain. They aren't reinvesting in their plants because the market is uncertain. They aren't opening new locations because the market is uncertain. Blah blah blah.
Throughout my professional life, one of the first questions I've been asked in every interview has boiled down to "how well do you handle uncertainty?" A bad answer, one that suggests that the applicant doesn't love love love uncertainty, is a poison pill that will surely cause the company to pass you by.
Maybe I should answer "I handle uncertainty at least as well as corporate America."