Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,356 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 10:02 PM Feb 2017

The Johnson Amendment, Which Trump Vows to Destroy, Explained

WASHINGTON — When President Trump told an audience of religious leaders on Thursday that he would ‘destroy’ the Johnson Amendment, he declared his intention to sign a bill that would fundamentally alter a major aspect of the church-state divide that has been a constant in American politics for generations.

But what exactly is the Johnson Amendment?

A restriction for churches and nonprofits

It is one of the brightest lines in the legal separation between religion and politics. Under the provision, which was made in 1954, tax-exempt entities like churches and charitable organizations are unable to directly or indirectly participate in any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate. Specifically, ministers are restricted from endorsing or opposing candidates from the pulpit. If they do, they risk losing their tax-exempt status.

Considered uncontroversial at the time, it was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican. Today, however, many Republicans want to repeal it.

The ‘Johnson’ is Lyndon Johnson

Back when Lyndon B. Johnson was a senator from Texas, he introduced the measure as an amendment to the tax code in 1954. Like many things Johnson did, the goal was to bludgeon a political opponent, in this case a rival in a primary who had the backing of nonprofit groups that were campaigning against him by suggesting he was a communist. Though there was no church involved, according to PolitiFact, churches were covered by the bill as well.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/us/politics/johnson-amendment-trump.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Johnson Amendment, Which Trump Vows to Destroy, Explained (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2017 OP
How about this for religious freedom: pat_k Feb 2017 #1
Yup, they should be paying taxes anyway 2naSalit Feb 2017 #2

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
1. How about this for religious freedom:
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 10:42 PM
Feb 2017

If being forced to choose between tax exemption and political activity is a limit on "religious freedom," eliminate the tax exemption. Problem solved. Then they'll be free to do all sorts of things they can't as tax exempt entities.

2naSalit

(86,880 posts)
2. Yup, they should be paying taxes anyway
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 10:46 PM
Feb 2017

and they have been "politicking" a whole bunch from the pulpit for a long time now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Johnson Amendment, Wh...