Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NRaleighLiberal

(60,027 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 09:28 AM Feb 2017

This is sad, really - Slate - "Facts Don't Win Arguments...Emotions Do"

It’s Time to Give Up on Facts

Or at least to temporarily lay them down in favor of a more useful weapon: emotions.

By Jess Zimmerman

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/02/counter_lies_with_emotions_not_facts.html

Several years ago, when my last name was different and my politics were less entrenched, I worked for a nonpartisan fact-checking site. We analyzed falsehoods in political speeches and ads and email forwards: No, there won't be death panels. No, Sarah Palin didn't cut funding for special education. Yes, Obama was born in America. No, he wasn't in the video for “Whoomp, There It Is.” We called many of these “zombie rumors”—we would try to smack them down, but a few months later, there they would be again. Over the three years I worked there, more and more zombie rumors massed at our door. We just kept plugging away, calmly stating the facts, because that was our job, but inside our well-insulated office we were screaming. What was the point of working so tirelessly to uncover the truth when the falsehoods never died?

In fact, by trying to stem the tide of untruths, we were probably making everything worse. Repeating a falsehood, even as part of a meticulously researched article that debunks it, actually reinforces the falsehood; the human brain seems to experience fact-checking as a statement followed by a bunch of Charlie Brown teacher noises. We knew this even then: I can probably designate a Washington Post article about the lie-repetition phenomenon as my first “lol nothing matters” moment, six years before the phrase became a meme. My most memorable illustration of this concept was the time that someone emailed to ask about a rumor on Snopes.com, forwarding along the page. It said “FALSE” boldly at the top. The person had forgotten that part but remembered the claim.

In the years since that Post article, which discussed research stretching back to 1945, psychologists, linguists, and philosophers have continued to explore why and how our brains cling to lies. And all the while, those lie-loving brains have kept at it, allowing the stream of email rumors I dealt with a decade ago to metastasize into an entire fake news industry and eventually a White House that traffics in “alternative facts.” Now all of us, not just the fact-checkers, are faced with the challenge of trying to reckon with a dubious alternate reality filled with fraudulent voters, pizza-joint sex rings, and massacres in Bowling Green. As linguist George Lakoff was still trying to tell us even as of last month, the more we correct them, the more ingrained they get. And yet we’re still trying to fact-check our way out. It’s an impulse we just can’t seem to kick.

snip

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is sad, really - Slate - "Facts Don't Win Arguments...Emotions Do" (Original Post) NRaleighLiberal Feb 2017 OP
this is well known in psychological fields ProfessorPlum Feb 2017 #1
here's a link to the illustrations in the book ProfessorPlum Feb 2017 #2
You can do both, something I wish more Democrats would practice. randome Feb 2017 #3

ProfessorPlum

(11,279 posts)
1. this is well known in psychological fields
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 11:04 AM
Feb 2017

there is a great book called "The Righteous Mind" by Jonathan Haidt which describes this phenomenon. How we make decisions with our emotions and then use our intellect to justify them. It's a cool book, and an excellent primer into the minds of our conservative brethren and what makes them tick.

But Democrats, if they actually want to win elections and have political power, need to start speaking in these languages of emotions. It's why Elizabeth Warren is so effective - she couches the wealth gap and deceptive banking practices with emotional language that makes sense to the average voter. Even for conservatives, fairness and care for others matter. We just need to couch our policies in more populist (ie emotionally relevant) ways.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. You can do both, something I wish more Democrats would practice.
Wed Feb 8, 2017, 11:08 AM
Feb 2017

You can argue about the plight of the middle class or you can phrase it differently, such as it's a sign of national unity and strength to be in favor of equitable taxation, and that other countries manage their infrastructure needs fine so why is America falling behind?

Some Progressives do that but others don't. Facts and figures are often not enough.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is sad, really - Sla...