Bill Cosby Playboy sexual assault case to go ahead
Source: BBC News
The California Supreme Court rejected his petition to review the case brought by Judy Huth - meaning her lawyers can now question Mr Cosby under oath.
The 78-year-old is facing a string of sexual assault accusations dating back decades.
He has always maintained his innocence and has never been criminally charged.
Ms Huth alleges that Mr Cosby plied her with alcohol before sexually assaulting her.
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33632330
Huth's lawyer, Gloria Allred, states the California Supreme Court's decision is a "major victory" and Allred also stated her plans to take a sworn deposition from the comedian within the next month.
Response to avaistheone1 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bucolic_frolic
(43,465 posts)I often can't remember what I had for breakfast
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)and raped. But I suspect victims who've had such an experience will say it leaves more of an impression that what they ate for breakfast.
bucolic_frolic
(43,465 posts)but evidence in a court of law is based on facts rather than impressions,
and defense attorneys would have a particularly abundant landscape exploring if
memories match facts, for example, what was someone wearing, what
color were the drapes. Once the memory is proven fallible, it casts doubt on
other events remembered.
I'm not taking sides, just stating it as I see it.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)From the article:
They revealed Mr Cosby had admitted obtaining Quaaludes from several doctors to give to women before sexual encounters...
Did the women take the drug willingly? Or were they given the drug without their knowledge? And if they were given the drug without their knowledge, Mr. Cosby should explain why.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Bars were open bars at Playboy mansion, with bartender and servers to mix & bring drinks.
PSPS
(13,631 posts)Why was a 15-year-old at the Playboy Mansion?
Monk06
(7,675 posts)PSPS
(13,631 posts)I haven't seen much of the background on this, but was she there already? Did Cosby bring her? Perhaps it was never part of the record.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)a bit of cocktail society cover. And that's being kind.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)roamer65
(36,748 posts)In many states, introduction of matching DNA evidence allows the case to be opened after the SOL has run out.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)but still 40 years is a long to hold onto something like that.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)This was 40 years ago, and unless there are witnesses, camera footage, or some other evidence, i don't see how she can prevail. All the other victims will be barred from testifying because it's prejudicial and not a proven legal fact.
pitohui
(20,564 posts)these women are at a stage in life when they can no longer be blackballed from working, from getting husbands, etc. if they speak out because their careers are long over anyway
let them speak
justice will never prevail, justice delayed IS justice denied, the fact that this man lived most of his life as a wealthy & respected man will not be erased
but it's the same argument hunting down nazis, yeah, i understand ww2 was in the forties and they've moved on but you know what? the victims never move on
give the women who still survive some peace and some evidence at least that crosby had at least one troubled night because of what he did to them
Calista241
(5,586 posts)seeking redress. I just think she has a tough ahead.