Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 05:48 AM Aug 2015

Bush: More troops in Iraq ‘may well be needed’

Source: mcclatchy

Jeb Bush said more soldiers and marines “may well be needed” in Iraq as he laid out a muscular approach to defeating the Islamic State Tuesday night, calling for embedding troops with Iraqi forces as he sought to lay the blame for the terrorist group’s emergence on President Barack Obama and his former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The Iraq war has bedeviled his campaign, but Bush sought to turn the tables, blaming Clinton and the Obama administration for allowing the Islamic State to grow by pulling out troops and leaving Iraq in a “blind haste.”

“They believe in soft power,” Bush said. “I don’t have a problem with soft power, as long as there is hard power behind it.”

At the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, Bush laid out a more detailed plan for fighting the terrorist group than any of his Republican presidential rivals. But his speech carried risks, with Clinton’s campaign calling it a “bold attempt to rewrite history and reassign responsibility.” And he called for stepped up military involvement in Iraq and in Syria, including air strikes and enforcing a no-fly zone.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article30805770.html#storylink=cpy

Read more: http://www.http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article30805770.htmldc.com/news/politics-government/election/article30805770.html




Anyone else think I went back in time to get this headline and news story?

LOL
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bush: More troops in Iraq ‘may well be needed’ (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 OP
I have a better idea, yuiyoshida Aug 2015 #1
Fantastic idea newfie11 Aug 2015 #2
Until these sociopaths like the Bushes get a real taste of what war involves, they'll continue bulloney Aug 2015 #3
Better yet. RoccoR5955 Aug 2015 #5
"Anyone else think I went back in time to get this headline" BumRushDaShow Aug 2015 #4
i love your student at his desk restorefreedom Aug 2015 #16
Ooo! Oooo! Mister KOT-TERRRR!!!!!!! BumRushDaShow Aug 2015 #18
wow does that take me back. nt restorefreedom Aug 2015 #19
Pack your bags, Jeb, and those of your family and get the hell over there! City Lights Aug 2015 #6
He And His Partner Hillary Should Go First billhicks76 Aug 2015 #7
typical bush tactic, when bereft of original ideas, they double down on stupid. nt Javaman Aug 2015 #8
Like Father, Like Sons bucolic_frolic Aug 2015 #9
Then send your kids, Jebbie. whathehell Aug 2015 #10
He did MosheFeingold Aug 2015 #12
Its nice to hear at least one the original Bush's 11 Military age grandchildren served.. whathehell Aug 2015 #13
Yeah silenttigersong Aug 2015 #11
Didn't I see this headline ten years ago? Jack Rabbit Aug 2015 #14
Republicans love to send your sons and daughters off to unnecessary wars tabasco Aug 2015 #15
Your comment was my first thought, HOW could this be lbn? Argh uppityperson Aug 2015 #17
Hot damn, who would have thought of that? lark Aug 2015 #20
Will the MSM ever correct this lie? Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #21
I am now convinced... dhill926 Aug 2015 #22

bulloney

(4,113 posts)
3. Until these sociopaths like the Bushes get a real taste of what war involves, they'll continue
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 06:51 AM
Aug 2015

to just gin up the war calls.

Bush's MIC donors are apparently crying that they're not raking in tons of money as fast as they'd like.

This is all Bush and Cheney's fault. They lied us into Iraq and created this quagmire that will never get resolved. The fact that those clowns and other members of their administration haven't been tried as war criminals is further proof that we have a two-class system consisting of the sociopaths with all of the money and the rest of us who are little more than cannon fodder for the sociopaths.

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
12. He did
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:18 AM
Aug 2015

His son George P Bush served in Operation Enduring Freedom.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_P._Bush

I don't care for the Bushes, in the least (although I did respect the original Bush as a fellow serviceman in WWII, even though I disagreed with him -- they don't make many Republicans like that any more).

whathehell

(29,103 posts)
13. Its nice to hear at least one the original Bush's 11 Military age grandchildren served..
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:27 AM
Aug 2015

but considering the wars they've started and want to start, I wouldn't call it a grand slam.

All five of FDR's sons served in WW11, four of them in combat.

silenttigersong

(957 posts)
11. Yeah
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:54 AM
Aug 2015

I always wondered if Bush and Cheney had been prosecuted ,how that would have affected the situation in Irag.

lark

(23,191 posts)
20. Hot damn, who would have thought of that?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:37 PM
Aug 2015

A Bush wanting to send Americans to die in Iraq, oh, that would never happen. Yeah, right. Seems it's in their DNA, you get a shrub, you get a war in Iraq.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
21. Will the MSM ever correct this lie?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 02:32 PM
Aug 2015

President Obama merely followed the SOFA. From Wikipedia:

The U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement (official name: Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq) was a status of forces agreement (SOFA) between Iraq and the United States, signed by President George W. Bush in 2008.

It established that U.S. combat forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and all U.S. combat forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011.[1] The pact required criminal charges for holding prisoners over 24 hours, and required a warrant for searches of homes and buildings that were not related to combat.[1] U.S. contractors working for U.S. forces would have been subject to Iraqi criminal law, while contractors working for the State Department and other U.S. agencies would retain their immunity. If U.S. forces committed still undecided "major premeditated felonies" while off-duty and off-base, they would have been subjected to an undecided procedures laid out by a joint U.S.-Iraq committee if the U.S. certified the forces were off-duty.[2][3][1][4]

The agreement expired at midnight on December 31, 2011, even though the United States completed its final withdrawal of troops from Iraq on December 16, 2011. The symbolic ceremony in Baghdad officially "cased" (retired) the flag of U.S. forces in Iraq, according to army tradition.[5]

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bush: More troops in Iraq...