Australia, Japan sign defense pact as China concerns loom
Source: AP
SYDNEY (AP) The leaders of Japan and Australia signed a landmark defense agreement Thursday that allows closer cooperation between their militaries and stands as a rebuke to China's growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region.
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida met in a virtual summit to sign the Reciprocal Access Agreement, the first such defense pact signed by Japan with any country other than the United States.
The agreement follows more than a year of talks between Japan and Australia aimed at breaking down legal barriers to allow the troops of one country to enter the other for training and other purposes.
Japan is our closest partner in Asia as demonstrated by our special strategic partnership Australias only such partnership, Morrison said. An equal partnership, shared trust between two great democracies committed to the rule of law, human rights, free trade and a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Read more: https://kearneyhub.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/australia-japan-sign-defense-pact-as-china-concerns-loom/article_37339942-8340-54d3-af70-7647ca8e09ed.html
BlueWavePsych
(2,641 posts)EastMeetsWest
(191 posts)I hope the QUAD will help to keep China from doing something stupid, like attacking Taiwan, and perhaps even Japan. But I'm a bit worried. If you think Kim Jong-un is unhinged, well, Xi is probably worse. He is as petulant as a 3-year-old brat (he reportedly throws a snit fit whenever someone calls him "Pooh" , and he has a super tantrum when another country uses "Taiwan" in an official capacity, even going so far as to recall ambassadors and threatening trade boycotts. Read about "China, Lithuania, Taiwan Representative Office" to get an idea.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,838 posts)Well, here we are.
roamer65
(36,748 posts)EastMeetsWest
(191 posts)As the only nation that has been on the receiving end of a nuclear attack, Japan is well aware of the destruction that nuclear weapons can cause. In a recent nationwide postal poll sponsored by the Chunichi Shimbun newspaper, 71% of respondents wanted Japan to participate in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (核禁条約 ) which went into effect last year.
betsuni
(25,840 posts)No money and nobody to assert anything.
EastMeetsWest
(191 posts)You have a Japanese name but you don't seem to know Japan.
EastMeetsWest
(191 posts)I'm in Kanto, and I've been working and living here for 3 decades. 私は関東地方で30年間、生活や仕事をしています。あなたは?
catsudon
(857 posts)no text
EastMeetsWest
(191 posts)I'm a newbie here, but I've spent half of my life in Japan, and I get a bad vibe from what I've read from her.
catsudon
(857 posts)while trying to learn japanese. I'm taiwanese so i can spot pro ccp shills easily.
we know most mainlanders hate Japanese and America, but yet they still prefer to live in the states and love to vacation in japan.
betsuni
(25,840 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Main Stream:
Urban Dictionary:
Are you really sure you want to call someone here on DU, especially one who has been around for about nine years, a "paid operative of the Chinese Communist Party" and "loser"?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)isn't allowed, much less suggesting... Catsudon's fairly new also so may not know either. Here's a link to the TOS, which are enforced.
Welcome to DU, of course. I suspect you and Betsuni will enjoy chatting once you get to know each other.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Cha
(298,119 posts)"newbie" and I've Respected her for years.
lapucelle
(18,417 posts)Welcome to DU.
George II
(67,782 posts)Main Stream:
Urban Dictionary:
Are you really sure you want to call someone here on DU, especially one who has been around for about nine years, a "paid operative of the Chinese Communist Party" and "loser"?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)big defense action among many Indopacific nations.
That food packet looks like a sensible easy-prep stock, and I wouldn't mind getting it as is. As apparently some others wouldn't either.
I don't think, though, that a U.S. version would work here with over 130 million households with 330 million people. Most Americans wouldn't need it to begin with. Ultimately, waste of food would probably be enormous and itself become a subject of national discontent and criticism. (Not least among those who complain about everything the government does.)
There are a number of reasons we issued rescue checks to our large, culturally diverse and widely spread people, including
* enabling personal choices to meet personal needs,
* again, the adequate food stocks in or available to most households already,
* free food banks and other food distribution services already existing in most communities,
* ease and speed of delivery of relief checks to all households (big!), and
* spread of the money throughout local communities to multiply its benefit to many (a super big one!).
* And?