Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(130,368 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 01:14 PM Feb 2023

Special counsel asks judge to compel Mike Pence to testify in Jan. 6 probe

Source: CBS News

Washington — Federal prosecutors have asked the chief judge in Washington, D.C.'s federal court to compel former Vice President Mike Pence to comply with a grand jury subpoena and testify as a witness in special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into the events surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, three people familiar with the investigation told CBS News.

The motion to compel Pence's testimony — filed in secret to Chief Judge Beryl Howell in recent days — came after lawyers for former President Donald Trump asserted executive privilege in response to Pence's subpoena, the people said.

That assertion of executive privilege on Pence's subpoena, the people added, is in line with how Trump's team has responded to related subpoenas over the past year, with Trump's attorneys often arguing that private conversations or interactions with a president should remain confidential. The latest filing also comes after Pence has signaled he would oppose a subpoena from Smith's office.

Pence and his lawyers have also been preparing to invoke the Constitution's Speech or Debate clause as a means of protecting him from the investigation. That clause protects members of Congress from being questioned about their legislative actions by other branches of the federal government.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jan-6-special-counsel-asks-judge-compel-mike-pence-testify/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=202779098

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Special counsel asks judge to compel Mike Pence to testify in Jan. 6 probe (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 2023 OP
It was Mike Pence after all TDFG wanted to overturn the 2020 election for him.... ProudMNDemocrat Feb 2023 #1
Ol' fly-head wants it to appear that he's being dragged bodily into court EYESORE 9001 Feb 2023 #2
A possibility is Pence asked for the subpoena, to give himself political cover. Pobeka Feb 2023 #3
That is the first thing that comes to my mind... IthinkThereforeIAM Feb 2023 #13
Putz might as well testify. zuul Feb 2023 #4
To say nothing of the fact most Repugs see him as THE reason that Cheeto's not president now peppertree Feb 2023 #6
Nothin like hitchin' yer chariot to an ass Marthe48 Feb 2023 #8
Well said! peppertree Feb 2023 #9
if he does that will mean larger defense funds will be needed. republianmushroom Feb 2023 #5
His wife could get a job. multigraincracker Feb 2023 #7
Will this ultimately go to the Supreme Court? If so, Pence would likely win, no? TheRickles Feb 2023 #10
SCOTUS has already ruled against privilege claims by TFG Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #17
"We'll stand on that principle and we'll take that case as far as it needs to go, if it needs be... progressoid Feb 2023 #11
The Speech and Debate Clause states lostinhere Feb 2023 #15
Speech and Debate only protects conduct on the floor of congress Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #19
Hardly Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #18
Hope so. progressoid Feb 2023 #20
I always thought that covering up a possible CRIME was bluestarone Feb 2023 #12
The Speech & Debate Clause states that lostinhere Feb 2023 #16
The issue here though BumRushDaShow Feb 2023 #21
"No Executive privilege, No Legislative privilege. That leaves only Republican privilege." Marcuse Feb 2023 #14
ask him how he feels about his possible escape route being outed to tuck tuck dembotoz Feb 2023 #22

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,966 posts)
1. It was Mike Pence after all TDFG wanted to overturn the 2020 election for him....
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 01:21 PM
Feb 2023

On Jan.6th in order to unconstitutionally stay in power. "If Mike Pence does not do the right thing, I might not like him as much." TDFG said at a Georgia rally on Jan.4th before the runoff for the US Senate there.

Former VP Mike Pence has much information for Smith that has already been revealed somewhat in his published book. If he can put this in a book and cannot before a Special Counsel, says a lot about Mike Pence's still loyalty to a man who wanted him hanged, called him a COWARD in a Tweet on Jan.6th, and who refuses to stand up to him face to face.

I think SC Jack Smith has a good case to present to compel Mike Pence to honor the subpeona.

EYESORE 9001

(26,060 posts)
2. Ol' fly-head wants it to appear that he's being dragged bodily into court
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 01:21 PM
Feb 2023

Hope he doesn’t perjure himself - not that I GAF about his own legal problems - but we deserve the truth. Hope he remembers how to speak it.

Pobeka

(4,999 posts)
3. A possibility is Pence asked for the subpoena, to give himself political cover.
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 01:33 PM
Feb 2023

This apparently happens a lot, and usually counsels are willing to do so.

-- From the Jack podcast (Allison Gill and Andrew McCabe)

IthinkThereforeIAM

(3,078 posts)
13. That is the first thing that comes to my mind...
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 02:52 PM
Feb 2023

... Pence wants the appearance of being dragged in kicking and screaming out of fear of TFG, MTG, Gaetz, etc...

zuul

(14,631 posts)
4. Putz might as well testify.
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 01:34 PM
Feb 2023

He torpedoed any chance that he has at the presidency with his recent statements about Social Security. Give it up, Mikey, you're done.

peppertree

(21,795 posts)
6. To say nothing of the fact most Repugs see him as THE reason that Cheeto's not president now
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 01:43 PM
Feb 2023

The ones who'll acknowledge he's not the president, anyway.

Hmm!

peppertree

(21,795 posts)
9. Well said!
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 02:13 PM
Feb 2023

That "down home" gentleman could ask the people of East Palestine (70%+ GOP voters), how much Republicans and their donors care about them - from Gov. deWhine on down.

They wouldn't give them the (minimal) consideration they give livestock.

Livestock, after all, is an asset.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,729 posts)
17. SCOTUS has already ruled against privilege claims by TFG
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 03:34 PM
Feb 2023

No reason to think this would be any different.

progressoid

(50,043 posts)
11. "We'll stand on that principle and we'll take that case as far as it needs to go, if it needs be...
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 02:26 PM
Feb 2023
"On the day of Jan. 6, I was acting as president of the Senate, presiding over a joint session described in the Constitution itself. So, I believe that that Speech and Debate clause of the Constitution actually prohibits the executive branch from compelling me to appear in a court, as the Constitution says, or in any other place," Pence — who is considering whether he will run for president in 2024 — told reporters in Iowa last week.

"We'll stand on that principle and we'll take that case as far as it needs to go, if it needs be to the Supreme Court of the United States," he added.



If it goes to the supreme court, he might win.

lostinhere

(78 posts)
15. The Speech and Debate Clause states
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 03:22 PM
Feb 2023
Article I, Section 6, Clause 1:

The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
(emphasis added)

VP Pence is claiming that he was an 'acting Senator' when fulfilling the role of President of the Senate. However,

Article I, Section 3, Clause 4:

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.


The Constitution never states that the VP is a Senator. The VP can't vote in the Senate unless there's a tie.

So, I believe that its a 50/50 shot in the Supreme Court. If you go by the written text and the original meaning, then the Speech and Debate Clause probably does not cover the VP.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,729 posts)
18. Hardly
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 03:36 PM
Feb 2023

SCOTUS ruled against Trump’s previous EP claims, and Lindsey Graham lost his case claiming protection under speech and debate and was forced to testify in the GA case.

bluestarone

(17,179 posts)
12. I always thought that covering up a possible CRIME was
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 02:32 PM
Feb 2023

NOT PROTECTED? That's the part i don't get. IF there is a possible crime committed, they should be required to testify?

lostinhere

(78 posts)
16. The Speech & Debate Clause states that
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 03:33 PM
Feb 2023

Senators and Representatives cannot be questioned

and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

So, a Senator or Representative cannot be questioned about anything that occurs in either chamber or while they are traveling to or from the chamber. A blanket coverage. That's why a Senator or Representative can read a classified document from the chamber floor, or lie, or assault another member with a cane (pre-Civil War) and nothing happens.

The question the courts would need to answer, was VP Pence a Senator on January 6, 2021.

BumRushDaShow

(130,368 posts)
21. The issue here though
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 06:46 PM
Feb 2023

is that there was plenty going on both before and after he was performing that role as "President of the Senate" that had nothing to do with his acting in that function in the the House chamber for the Electoral Count duties. I.e., he was on "President of the Senate" while engaged in that Electoral count function.

But when it came to say, any discussions with Department/Agency heads about invoking the 25th Amendment, he wasn't acting as a functionary of the Senate. He was the VP.

Lindsey Graham attempted (and failed) to somehow have that "Speech and Debate" clause make him immune to any type of investigation for any communications that he may have had outside of giving a "Morning Business" speech or remarks during a debate.

dembotoz

(16,874 posts)
22. ask him how he feels about his possible escape route being outed to tuck tuck
Thu Feb 23, 2023, 07:47 PM
Feb 2023

does he have nightmare about what would have happened to him if trumps boys had found him.....

delivered from evil by the grace of god and the capital police....

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Special counsel asks judg...