Biden Administration Announces Indo-Pacific Deal, Clashing With Industry Groups
Source: New York Times
The Biden administration announced Saturday that it had reached an agreement with 13 other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to coordinate supply chains, in an effort to lessen the countries dependence on China for critical products and allow them to better weather crises like wars, pandemics and climate change.
The supply chain agreement is the first result of the administrations trade initiative in the region, called the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. Negotiations are continuing for the other three pillars of the agreement, which focus on facilitating trade and improving conditions for workers, expanding the use of clean energy, and reforming tax structures and fighting corruption.
Gina Raimondo, the secretary of commerce, said the supply chain agreement would deepen Americas economic cooperation with partners in the Indo-Pacific region, helping American companies do business there and making the United States more competitive globally. Bottom line is, this is about increasing the U.S. economic presence in the region, she said in a call with reporters Thursday.
But prominent business groups expressed reservations about the Indo-Pacific deal, and on Friday, more than 30 of them sent a public letter to the administration saying the negotiations were leaving out traditional U.S. trade priorities that could help American exporters. That included lowering tariffs charged on their goods but also limiting other regulatory barriers to trade and establishing stronger intellectual property protections.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/27/business/economy/biden-indo-pacific-trade-deal.html
No paywall (gift)
Press release - https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2023/05/substantial-conclusion-negotiations-landmark-ipef-supply-chain

peppertree
(22,850 posts)At least back then, people knew what to call it.
I doubt 1 in 5 Americans could tell you what in tarnation the "USMCA" is.
"U.S. Men's Collegiate something, right?"
BumRushDaShow
(151,975 posts)or was at least continued from the Obama administration.
I think the pandemic really exposed how tenuous (and in some cases, completely catastrophic) the situation has been with relying almost solely on that area of the world for our supply chain.
peppertree
(22,850 posts)Up to Reagan, energy made up more than the entirety of our goods trade deficit - then a modest $28 billion or so.
Our manufacturing trade balance was actually slightly positive until then.
The problem grew to a whole other level after the '97 East Asian devaluations - especially after Dubya took office. The best president the Chinese ever had.
By 2008, we had become critically dependent on third-world and Chinese labor.
If we could bring back at least some of that manufacturing, what a difference it would make. But Big Bidness thinks otherwise, so...
BumRushDaShow
(151,975 posts)Complete deregulation and the concept of "outsourcing" overseas for the "cheap" labor cost. Never mind that there would be shipping costs to bring those items back to the U.S. for further assembly and/or distribution. And with that mindset, more and more companies adopted the "just in time" mode of operation, something that got completely upended with the pandemic.
peppertree
(22,850 posts)Long before John Birchers and their Big Bidness allies took up institutional 5th-columnism, they were all in on the economic one.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Now these industries have to be subsidized, heavily whose fault is that it isnt any other nation but one the one with the riddled feet.
2naSalit
(96,735 posts)To pay for labor or resources so they will fight to hold us hostage to the current, wrongheaded conditions.
There's a kind of perverse pleasure in all of it, no doubt.
2naSalit
(96,735 posts)Tetrachloride
(8,692 posts)Im sure President Biden does the same.
Those opponents? profiteers
Karadeniz
(24,315 posts)JustAnotherGen
(34,843 posts)There are way too many barriers for US Manufacturers to export into the region.
I wrote what I did as a Global Trade Compliance lead at a US Manufacturer. The Trump years were a disaster. It will also enable us to come to the table with everyone BUT China and deal with Taiwan without interference.
You need a license to ship one Tic Tac through TW to CN from the USA.
Bayard
(24,919 posts)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$