Judge strips Righthaven of rights to 278 copyrights and its trademark
Source: Vegas Inc (Las Vegas Sun)
Like a gunfighter with no bullets, Las Vegas copyright company Righthaven LLC no longer has any copyrights to sue over.
A federal judge in Las Vegas on Monday stripped Righthaven of whatever interests it has in its 278 federal copyright registrations as well as its trademark.
Judge Philip Pro ordered that the copyrights and trademarks be transferred to a court-appointed receiver so they can be auctioned to cover some of Righthavens debts.
... Marc Randazza, a Las Vegas attorney representing (Wayne) Hoehn, said after the hearing that Pros order wipes out Righthavens interest in all of its pending lawsuits and appeals. Since Righthaven now owns no copyrights, it has nothing to sue over or litigate over in appeals courts, he said.
Read more: http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/mar/05/judge-strips-righthaven-rights-278-copyrights-and-
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)sakabatou
(42,195 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)DCKit
(18,541 posts)Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)What goes around comes around, and payback is an MF.
Lasher
(27,652 posts)When I read that I was like "WHOA! That's Hugh!!"
It's almost like they don't have the legal right to say who they are
Occulus
(20,599 posts)Would it be permissible to make their trademark worthless, so it can't be auctioned?
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)?zz=1
PDJane
(10,103 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Up yer nose widda rubber hose, Righthaven! Twice as faaah widda chocolate baaaah!
Couldn't happen to a nicer group of scumbags!
[IMG][/IMG]
MADem
(135,425 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)"Judge Philip Pro ordered that the copyrights and trademarks be transferred to a court-appointed receiver so they can be auctioned to cover some of Righthavens debts."
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)Nice little present for Skinner.
bhsof8d9sa
(1 post)csziggy
(34,139 posts)From the link in the OP:
Some exceptions include some sports betting material that Righthaven used in its single lawsuit that didnt involve newspaper material.
Other exceptions include two porn movies Ebony Amateurs Vegas Edition #10 and Ebony Princess #3 and a document called The Righthaven Philosophy that apparently spells out the companys failed plan to make money by suing over copyright infringements.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)a document called The Righthaven Philosophy that apparently spells out the companys failed plan to make money by suing over copyright infringements.
Kind of incriminating, no?
csziggy
(34,139 posts)And so protected from being seized? Or perhaps that set of material could be part of a criminal investigation, including the porn? They certainly seem to belong to the same class.
But I sure would want to see what that document contains!
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)JBoy
(8,021 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)jonthebru
(1,034 posts)Warpy
(111,410 posts)I am delighted that DU was one such site that stood up to them. Their business model was clearly one that relied on extortion of settlements instead of fighting their generally bogus claims in court. Once fought, they crumbled.
Righthaven is gone. However, the same players will be back, likely with a slightly different take on copyright violation by websites.
Uncle Joe
(58,483 posts)Thanks for the thread, Newsjock.
Wow. The news keeps getting better and better each day. Steven Gibson got his day in court but it didn't go his way this time. boo hoo.