Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 12:19 AM Mar 2012

Judge strips Righthaven of rights to 278 copyrights and its trademark

Source: Vegas Inc (Las Vegas Sun)

Like a gunfighter with no bullets, Las Vegas copyright company Righthaven LLC no longer has any copyrights to sue over.

A federal judge in Las Vegas on Monday stripped Righthaven of whatever interests it has in its 278 federal copyright registrations as well as its trademark.

Judge Philip Pro ordered that the copyrights and trademarks be transferred to a court-appointed receiver so they can be auctioned to cover some of Righthaven’s debts.

... Marc Randazza, a Las Vegas attorney representing (Wayne) Hoehn, said after the hearing that Pro’s order wipes out Righthaven’s interest in all of its pending lawsuits and appeals. Since Righthaven now owns no copyrights, it has nothing to sue over or litigate over in appeals courts, he said.

Read more: http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/mar/05/judge-strips-righthaven-rights-278-copyrights-and-

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge strips Righthaven of rights to 278 copyrights and its trademark (Original Post) Newsjock Mar 2012 OP
Karma. nt Hissyspit Mar 2012 #1
Karma: Ain't it a bitch? sakabatou Mar 2012 #2
sweet leveymg Mar 2012 #3
"Dam aktvist juje1q1!111!" - Soon to be posted on FR DCKit Mar 2012 #4
Something about Old Codger Mar 2012 #5
They don't even have rights to their own company trademark, ha ha. Lasher Mar 2012 #6
I know! kentauros Mar 2012 #10
That means they can no longer sue over its unauthorized use Occulus Mar 2012 #17
HAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2012 #19
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2012 #7
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.. PDJane Mar 2012 #8
Bwahahahahahahahaha!!! Tee hee hee hee hee! Muahahahahaha! Chuckle, chortle! MADem Mar 2012 #9
Neener dixiegrrrrl Mar 2012 #24
That is beyond brilliant! nt MADem Mar 2012 #25
Ty..once in a while the brain hits the right synapses....lol. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2012 #26
I wonder who will buy them? bananas Mar 2012 #11
I still want to see if we can buy the copyright for the story DU got sued for. Pab Sungenis Mar 2012 #12
Spam deleted by OKNancy (MIR Team) bhsof8d9sa Mar 2012 #13
Oh darn - they didn't take the porn movies csziggy Mar 2012 #14
I should think any plaintiff would WANT them to continue to own that last one Occulus Mar 2012 #18
Maybe it counts as a communication between client and attorney csziggy Mar 2012 #20
One day soon it will be a collector's item for the best business FAIL plan. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2012 #27
Mama don't take my bluetooth away-a-a-ay! JBoy Mar 2012 #15
! FiveGoodMen Mar 2012 #16
Corporations are people man. jonthebru Mar 2012 #21
This is why people have to stand up to bullies instead of paying them to go away. Warpy Mar 2012 #22
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #23
K&R sonias Mar 2012 #28

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
10. I know!
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 07:11 AM
Mar 2012

When I read that I was like "WHOA! That's Hugh!!"

It's almost like they don't have the legal right to say who they are

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
17. That means they can no longer sue over its unauthorized use
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 01:23 PM
Mar 2012

Would it be permissible to make their trademark worthless, so it can't be auctioned?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. Bwahahahahahahahaha!!! Tee hee hee hee hee! Muahahahahaha! Chuckle, chortle!
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 07:06 AM
Mar 2012

Up yer nose widda rubber hose, Righthaven! Twice as faaah widda chocolate baaaah!



Couldn't happen to a nicer group of scumbags!

bananas

(27,509 posts)
11. I wonder who will buy them?
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 09:05 AM
Mar 2012

"Judge Philip Pro ordered that the copyrights and trademarks be transferred to a court-appointed receiver so they can be auctioned to cover some of Righthaven’s debts."

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
12. I still want to see if we can buy the copyright for the story DU got sued for.
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 09:31 AM
Mar 2012

Nice little present for Skinner.

csziggy

(34,139 posts)
14. Oh darn - they didn't take the porn movies
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 10:23 AM
Mar 2012

From the link in the OP:

Most of the copyrights to be transferred under Pro’s order cover material assigned to Righthaven for lawsuit purposes by the Review-Journal and the Denver Post.

Some exceptions include some sports betting material that Righthaven used in its single lawsuit that didn’t involve newspaper material.

Other exceptions include two porn movies — Ebony Amateurs Vegas Edition #10 and Ebony Princess #3 — and a document called “The Righthaven Philosophy” that apparently spells out the company’s failed plan to make money by suing over copyright infringements.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
18. I should think any plaintiff would WANT them to continue to own that last one
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 01:28 PM
Mar 2012
a document called “The Righthaven Philosophy” that apparently spells out the company’s failed plan to make money by suing over copyright infringements.


Kind of incriminating, no?

csziggy

(34,139 posts)
20. Maybe it counts as a communication between client and attorney
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 02:21 PM
Mar 2012

And so protected from being seized? Or perhaps that set of material could be part of a criminal investigation, including the porn? They certainly seem to belong to the same class.

But I sure would want to see what that document contains!

Warpy

(111,410 posts)
22. This is why people have to stand up to bullies instead of paying them to go away.
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 06:09 PM
Mar 2012

I am delighted that DU was one such site that stood up to them. Their business model was clearly one that relied on extortion of settlements instead of fighting their generally bogus claims in court. Once fought, they crumbled.

Righthaven is gone. However, the same players will be back, likely with a slightly different take on copyright violation by websites.

sonias

(18,063 posts)
28. K&R
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:32 PM
Mar 2012

Wow. The news keeps getting better and better each day. Steven Gibson got his day in court but it didn't go his way this time. boo hoo.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge strips Righthaven o...