Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 01:21 PM Apr 2014

House Panel Votes To Hold Former IRS Official In Contempt For Refusing To Testify At Hearings

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON — A House Committee voted Thursday to hold a former Internal Revenue Service official in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions at a pair of hearings.

The official, Lois Lerner, previously headed the IRS division that processes applications for tax-exempt status. Last May, after providing an opening statement, Lerner refused to answer questions at a House Oversight Committee hearing about IRS agents improperly singling out tea party applications for extra scrutiny. She again refused to answer questions at hearing in March.

Lerner cited her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

The Oversight Committee voted 21-12 Thursday to hold her in contempt. All Republicans voted in favor and all Democrats voted against.

Read more: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/254677251.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Panel Votes To Hold Former IRS Official In Contempt For Refusing To Testify At Hearings (Original Post) Purveyor Apr 2014 OP
Lerner (R-Romney donor) is playing the lead actress in Issa's scripted dogandponyshow. blm Apr 2014 #1
Exactly. savalez Apr 2014 #2
I totally agree rtracey Apr 2014 #3
I don't believe in 'coincidences' when dealing with Bush family or the GOP. blm Apr 2014 #5
Yep, that sums it up! nt CJCRANE Apr 2014 #13
Different Lois Lerner Roland99 Apr 2014 #14
Oh, now all of a sudden they're big on "accountability." Hissyspit Apr 2014 #4
Issa is nothing but a street thug along with his fellow gangsters harassing a Innocent pedestrian . geretogo Apr 2014 #6
In practical terms, what does it mean? question everything Apr 2014 #7
she won't...she's part of Issa's show blm Apr 2014 #8
From Wikipedia: christx30 Apr 2014 #9
I don't think Keefer Apr 2014 #10
why didnt this apply to kkkarl rove leftyohiolib Apr 2014 #11
He's too politically connected. christx30 Apr 2014 #12
oh yeah right our 2 tier justice system leftyohiolib Apr 2014 #15
The House could theoretically arrest her Morganfleeman Apr 2014 #16
Shudder.... thanks question everything Apr 2014 #17

blm

(113,131 posts)
1. Lerner (R-Romney donor) is playing the lead actress in Issa's scripted dogandponyshow.
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 01:35 PM
Apr 2014

She planted the question in the audience that started this whole dirt ball rolling while Issa DIRECTED the Inspector General to ONLY record the scrutiny given to RW groups and to ignore all others.

Issa MANUFACTURED the appearance of scandal to frame the WH. Corporate media lemmings ran with his script repeating it word for word for over a year.

There is only ONE person Lerner is protecting with her 5th Amendment pleas - Issa.

This is why Issa quickly shut down the hearing on Cummings after her second plea performance and why he will not let the committee give her immunity for her testimony.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
14. Different Lois Lerner
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:46 PM
Apr 2014

Lois I Lerner was a Romney donor (from opensecrets.org)

Lois G Lerner search comes up with no results.

Although, she was appointed to higher position in the IRS by a Bush appointee: http://www.irs.gov/uac/Lois-G.-Lerner-Selected-as-Director-of-IRS-Exempt-Organizations-Division

question everything

(47,586 posts)
7. In practical terms, what does it mean?
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 02:12 PM
Apr 2014

Do they have the authority to throw her in jail?

If not, I hope she tells them to f**ck themselves.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
9. From Wikipedia:
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 02:39 PM
Apr 2014

"Senate Rules authorize the Senate to direct the Senate Legal Counsel to file a civil action against any private individual found in contempt. Upon motion by the Senate, the federal district court issues another order for a person to comply with Senate process. If the subject then refuses to comply with the Court's order, the person may be cited for contempt of court and may incur sanctions imposed by the Court. The process has been used at least six times; but the civil procedure can only be used against Executive branch officials "in certain limited circumstances."[citation needed]"

Morganfleeman

(117 posts)
16. The House could theoretically arrest her
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 12:44 AM
Apr 2014

From what I've read on this point, Boehner could order the Sergeant At Arms to arrest her and she would be held until the next congress is seated in January. She of course would file a habeas petition in the interim to fight being held which would end up in federal district court. There is some precedent for this and Congress does have an enforceable inherent contempt power.

Many were suggesting this power be used against Harriet Miers and others during the Bush administration but it was never used.

question everything

(47,586 posts)
17. Shudder.... thanks
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 03:19 PM
Apr 2014

I hope that something like this will never happen, when it is clear that the agenda is politics..



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Panel Votes To Hold...