Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Julian Englis

(2,309 posts)
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:57 PM Mar 2012

Federal court rejects 'Joe the Plumber' suit

Source: Twin Cities.com/Pioneer Press

Federal appeals judges Tuesday rejected a lawsuit by "Joe the Plumber" that claimed his rights were violated by a state records search after he voiced public concern over taxes to then-candidate Barack Obama.

The three-judge 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel upheld a lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit. Samuel Wurzelbacher of the Toledo area became nationally known as "Joe" during the 2008 presidential campaign after the much-quoted discussion about taxes with Obama.

He claims his First Amendment and privacy rights were violated by three Ohio Job and Family Services officials who were Obama supporters and who searched databases for information about him soon after the discussion. The department's director and another official resigned and the third official was ousted in the aftermath of the searches.

The judges found Wurzelbacher wasn't harmed and there was no interference with his free speech by the "fruitless database searches" conducted.

Read more: http://www.twincities.com/allheadlines/ci_20267111/federal-court-rejects-joe-plumber-suit



Another victory of goodness over whining.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal court rejects 'Joe the Plumber' suit (Original Post) Julian Englis Mar 2012 OP
I Can See Why "Joe" Would be Upset On the Road Mar 2012 #1
Implication was probably that search was an effort to suppress his speech brooklynite Mar 2012 #4
He could only seek to have this tried as a Civil matter. greiner3 Mar 2012 #5
How disappointing for him... Grassy Knoll Mar 2012 #2
Flushed his case guitar man Mar 2012 #3
janitor in a drum likes all the trappings of fame but hates the part Javaman Mar 2012 #6

On the Road

(20,783 posts)
1. I Can See Why "Joe" Would be Upset
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 11:08 PM
Mar 2012

and even where he might have a case, but how can you make this a first amendment issue? Wouldn't it be a matter of privacy rights or use of government for partisan ends?

brooklynite

(94,922 posts)
4. Implication was probably that search was an effort to suppress his speech
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 07:24 AM
Mar 2012

and thus deny him rights under the First Amendment.

 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
5. He could only seek to have this tried as a Civil matter.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 07:55 AM
Mar 2012

This is something he should have done in the first place. But then again, he and his backers only care about the press he garnered about his suit.

Javaman

(62,534 posts)
6. janitor in a drum likes all the trappings of fame but hates the part
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:29 AM
Mar 2012

that fame has a price.

joe plumbing the depths of stupidity.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal court rejects 'Jo...