Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,104 posts)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:04 PM Mar 2012

Hold Off on the Obama Victory Dance

http://prospect.org/article/hold-obama-victory-dance

Hold Off on the Obama Victory Dance

Robert Kuttner

March 12, 2012

The president's re-election chances have improved, but Obama faces severe tests on energy and national security.


Things have been breaking well for President Obama. Economically, job growth has outperformed expectations. The unemployment rate could be below 8 percent by Election Day. Politically, Republicans are engaged in the sort of demolition derby once reserved for Democrats. The protracted Hillary-Barack duel of 2008 seems like a love feast compared to the Mitt and Rick slugfest. All this is reflected in the president’s rising approval ratings.

However, Obama faces a daunting two-part challenge related to Iran’s nuclear assertions, with implications for both national security and sustainable energy. A misstep could cost him the presidency and cause the country to take a disastrously wrong turn in these two critical areas.

snip//

Obama will need not only a policy of patient restraint vis-à-vis our enemy Iran but an equally firm policy to restrain our friend Israel. Here, too, he faces mischief from the Republican right, which is more slavishly pro-Israel than the Israel lobby.

Obama has been an effective foreign-policy president. His fate is to govern when the most pressing issues are economic. Unjustly, his foreign-policy successes have not gained him notable support, but foreign-policy failure would produce severe setbacks. If an oil shock derails the recovery, that failure would also have grave economic consequences with knock-on political effects.

For both energy and national security, what’s needed is more of the Barack Obama we glimpsed in 2008—the political leader as teacher. Obama has played this role better as a candidate than as chief executive. Happily, President Obama is again a candidate. On both energy and national -security, Iran offers a politically tempting low road and a more arduous but ultimately rewarding high road. To make the high road good politics will take rare leadership to educate public opinion and isolate the ultras.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
1. amen
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:09 PM
Mar 2012

especially as the oil comanies will do anything and everything to get that war with Iran and that keystone pipeline

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
2. I think the President has three major issues that the GOPers could exploit.
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:17 PM
Mar 2012

-- Iran
-- gas prices/energy
-- Obamacare

Regardless I think he wins but these issues will make it a challenge especially when we will have RW media backing the Republican nominee non-stop 24x7x365.

babylonsister

(171,104 posts)
3. One major consolation might be debates; we do need an honest proctor though, who
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:28 PM
Mar 2012

would point out varying opinions expressed, and I don't see that happening.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
5. Im sure the President will do very well in the debates againts Romney.
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:42 PM
Mar 2012

No doubt Mittens will get flustered and say something stupid as he has done so many times before.

JHB

(37,163 posts)
14. Just remember Bush said stupid things too...
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 08:00 AM
Mar 2012

...and that didn't keep him out of the Oval Office. Mitt doesn't have the cheerleader factor that Bush had going for him to deflect poor performance, but the lesson is to not assume the outcome.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
6. They showed a poll on MSNBC during NewsNation earlier today
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 07:11 PM
Mar 2012

that says that Romney would win against Obama in November. So much for that 9 point advantage we've had for the past several weeks.

babylonsister

(171,104 posts)
9. Yes, but there are all kinds of people, articles, etc., even from the republicans,
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 08:27 PM
Mar 2012

claiming they're not the President's fault, but speculators. I can't imagine anyone in the groups I mentioned would vote for a rethug solely on that, especially when all 3 groups have been disparaged so mercilessly by rethugs based solely on their ethnicity or sex.

Response to babylonsister (Reply #7)

Icicle

(121 posts)
12. Never underestimate...
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 02:01 AM
Mar 2012

....the Dirty Tricks Squad.
We really need to be on our guard for election tomfoolery.
Think FLA 2000.
Seriously, if it becomes apparent that the Republicans will lose, I think they will try every trick to win.
We must be vigilant.

 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
13. $3.78 a gallon
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 07:21 AM
Mar 2012

Is your answer. Not many people pay any attention to media squabbles. They all have to fill er up.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
11. March to November is an eternity in Presidential Politics
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 11:44 PM
Mar 2012

You really can't start looking at polls for either side until after the convention. Note that the GOP has now gone into the "It's going to be Mitt" mode. Mitt is buring through cash that the GOP would have preferred to spend battling Obama. In times past, they might have struck a deal to put Santorum on the ticket as Mitt's veep, and that could have ended it. However, I think Romney's veep will either be Marco Rubio or Bob McDonnell (maybe Tim Pawlenty). In any event, there's a lot more politicking to be done by both sides, and the GOP will continue primary battles for at least a few more weeks.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Hold Off on the Obama Vic...