Boston Globe: After criminal referral, what's next for Donald Trump?
By Travis Andersen Globe Staff
Updated December 19, 2022, 3:47 p.m. ET
(snip)
In the Jan. 6 probe, the Justice Departments charging decision shouldnt be influenced by the challenges inherent in prosecuting a former president, said Tim Naftali, an associate clinical professor of history at NYUs Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service.
The test of this referral shouldnt be how tough it would be to prosecute, Naftali tweeted. It should be based on an assessment of the long term cost of federal silence on Trumps criminal liability. When future Americans learn about the insurrection, would they understand that silence?
(snip)
Joyce Alene, a former US attorney in Alabama during the Obama administration, tweeted that the committees report should at the very least affect public opinion.
At least for purposes of the court of public opinion, the evidence against Trump is overwhelming, Alene wrote, adding that theres more to come. Todays 161-page report is just the executive summary. The full report and back up documentation comes Wednesday.
Full article:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/12/19/nation/after-criminal-referral-whats-next-trump/
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)We need a REAL court that can hand out REAL convictions and REAL penalties.
The "court of public opinion" had already concluded Trump was a jerk by the end of the 2016 race. It didn't stop him from getting elected, thanks to the EC. No reason why that couldn't happen again, as long as we don't get the above.
republianmushroom
(13,850 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,365 posts)Golf.