Attorney General Eric Holder Defends Legality of Targeted Killings of U.S. Citizens Overseas

[The Northerner]

democracynow.org - Using armed drones, President Obama has overseen the targeted killing of at least three U.S. civilians overseas — more than President Bush did in his eight years in office. Are the killings legal? Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, says Attorney General Eric Holder's defense on Monday of the Obama administration's policy authorizing the assassination of U.S. citizens abroad "left open more questions than it answered." She says Holder's speech amounted to a broad defense of the administration's claimed expansive authority to kill its own citizens, far from any battlefield and without judicial review or oversight of legal standards. While "Holder acknowledges that the Constitution requires 'due process' before the government takes the life of one of its own citizens," Shamsi argues, "He says it is up to the Executive Branch alone without judicial review to determine what process is due and to make that decision without any oversight — and that's simply not the case in our constitutional system of checks and balances." The ACLU is suing the White House to disclose its legal memos that justify targeted killings.

[tblue]

1. Can't be defended, far as I'm concerned.

Horrible precident. HORRIBLE!!!

[IamK]

2. Why deal with trials and all the legal stuff when you can just blow someone up?

Barack has kept his transparency promise on one hand... It's transparent if he wants
you gone.... BOOM....