Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Response to Stossel's Inconvenient Facts about EVs (Original Post) Quixote1818 Dec 2022 OP
Clowns moniss Dec 2022 #1
I agree with the commenter d_r Dec 2022 #2
Mark Mills was sneaky by saying 300 million cars instead of 1.5 billion Quixote1818 Dec 2022 #3

moniss

(4,274 posts)
1. Clowns
Wed Dec 28, 2022, 11:53 AM
Dec 2022

like Stossel also do the same sorts of "reports" about solar, wind etc. They use outdated and false info to twist a narrative and support a desired conclusion. I know a guy in AZ who is still convinced to this day that solar for his 2000 square foot house will cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars and will have gargantuan panels covering his whole house and property.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
2. I agree with the commenter
Wed Dec 28, 2022, 12:11 PM
Dec 2022

but I think he missed the statement on point 1. The dude didin't say if all cars in the world converted to EV it would reduce oil by 10%, he said if 300 million ice vehicles were replaced by ev it would reduce by 10%

Quixote1818

(29,014 posts)
3. Mark Mills was sneaky by saying 300 million cars instead of 1.5 billion
Wed Dec 28, 2022, 11:30 PM
Dec 2022

since in the future there is no reason all cars can't end up being EV's.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Response to Stossel's Inc...