Economy
Related: About this forumSTOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 15 February 2013
[font size=3]STOCK MARKET WATCH, Friday, 15 February 2013[font color=black][/font]
SMW for 14 February 2013
AT THE CLOSING BELL ON 14 February 2013
[center][font color=red]
Dow Jones 13,973.39 -9.52 (-0.07%)
[font color=green]S&P 500 1,521.38 +1.05 (0.07%)
Nasdaq 3,198.66 +1.78 (0.06%)
[font color=green]10 Year 1.97% -0.03 (-1.50%)
30 Year 3.18% -0.03 (-0.93%)[font color=black]
[center][/font]
[HR width=85%]
[font size=2]Market Conditions During Trading Hours[/font]
[center]
[/center]
[font size=2]Euro, Yen, Loonie, Silver and Gold[center]
[/center]
[/center]
[HR width=95%]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Market Data and News:[/font][/font]
[center]
Economic Calendar
Marketwatch Data
Bloomberg Economic News
Yahoo Finance
Google Finance
Bank Tracker
Credit Union Tracker
Daily Job Cuts
[/center]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Economic Blogs:[/font][/font]
[center]
The Big Picture
Financial Sense
Calculated Risk
Naked Capitalism
Credit Writedowns
Brad DeLong
Bonddad
Atrios
goldmansachs666
The Stand-Up Economist
The Automatic Earth
[/center]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Essential Reading:[/font][/font]
[center]
Matt Taibi: Secret and Lies of the Bailout
[/center]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Government Issues:[/font][/font]
[center]
LegitGov
Open Government
Earmark Database
USA spending.gov
[/center][font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Videos:[/font][/font]
[center]
Charlie Rose talks with Roubini
Charlie Rose talks with Krugman
William Black: This Economic Disaster
Bill Moyers with Kevin Drum and David Corn
[/center]
[div]
[font color=red]Partial List of Financial Sector Officials Convicted since 1/20/09 [/font][font color=red]
2/2/12 David Higgs and Salmaan Siddiqui, Credit Suisse, plead guilty to conspiracy involving valuation of MBS
3/6/12 Allen Stanford, former Caribbean billionaire and general schmuck, convicted on 13 of 14 counts in $2.2B Ponzi scheme, faces 20+ years in prison
6/4/12 Matthew Kluger, lawyer, sentenced to 12 years in prison, along with co-conspirator stock trader Garrett Bauer (9 years) and co-conspirator Kenneth Robinson (not yet sentenced) for 17 year insider trading scheme.
6/14/12 Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years without parole.
6/15/12 Rajat Gupta, former Goldman Sachs director, found guilty of insider trading. Could face a decade in prison when sentenced later this year.
6/22/12 Timothy S. Durham, 49, former CEO of Fair Financial Company, convicted of one count conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, 10 counts of wire fraud, and one count of securities fraud.
6/22/12 James F. Cochran, 56, former chairman of the board of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and six counts of wire fraud.
6/22/12 Rick D. Snow, 48, former CFO of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and three counts of wire fraud.
7/13/12 Russell Wassendorf Sr., CEO of collapsed brokerage firm Peregrine Financial Group Inc. arrested and charged with lying to regulators after admitting to authorities he embezzled "millions of dollars" and forged bank statements for "nearly twenty years."
8/22/12 Doug Whitman, Whitman Capital LLC hedge fund founder, convicted of insider trading following a trial in which he spent more than two days on the stand telling jurors he was innocent
10/26/12 UPDATE: Former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta sentenced to two years in federal prison. He will, of course, appeal. . .
11/20/12 Hedge fund manager Matthew Martoma charged with insider trading at SAC Capital Advisors, and prosecutors are looking at Martoma's boss, Steven Cohen, for possible involvement.
[HR width=95%]
[center]
[HR width=95%]
[font size=3][font color=red]This thread contains opinions and observations. Individuals may post their experiences, inferences and opinions on this thread. However, it should not be construed as advice. It is unethical (and probably illegal) for financial recommendations to be given here.[/font][/font][/font color=red][font color=black]
Warpy
(111,529 posts)I can't believe that man failed to rein in the abuse of the filibuster again. Now the Republicans have voted to filibuster one of their own.
You can't do business as usual, Harry, when one of the parties to that business is out to destroy everything.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Either that, or he's horribly senile.
siligut
(12,272 posts)He is Mormon, maybe it is a nature vs nurture sort of thing.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)we should live so long.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Think it will fall (or be pushed) under 1600?
westerebus
(2,976 posts)The CFTC is but a tool in the box doing g*d's work.
I guess it's to discount what needs to be bought to cover the German shortage at the NY FED.
Or Corzine is in the market. lol
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Maybe the speculators are getting squeezed like oranges, again.
westerebus
(2,976 posts)Not that anyone on the inside would ever trade that....
DemReadingDU
(16,001 posts)down $30.50, almost 2%
edit
The entire market seems to be falling like a rock.
What happened?
DemReadingDU
(16,001 posts)2/15/13 Equity Prices Are Artificially High Its Time to Take Profits: PIMCOs El-Erian
.
.
In terms of equity markets, El-Erian says investors are split into two camps. One camp believes that everything will go higher and central banks will succeed in their efforts. The other camp believes asset prices are going to come down to meet the fundamentals.
El-Erian puts himself in the second camp.
We think that prices are artificially high, he argues. Maintaining them here is going to be hard as central banks become less effective, and its time to book some profits and to wait for some better entry points.
He clarifies that this is not a Lehman moment." But prices that have gotten way ahead of what policy can deliver," he declares.
more...
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/pimco-el-erian-equity-prices-artificially-high-time-193327198.html
DemReadingDU
(16,001 posts)Oops
2/15/13 Wal-Mart Executives Sweat Slow February Start in E-Mails
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. had the worst sales start to a month in seven years as payroll-tax increases hit shoppers already battling a slow economy, according to internal e-mails obtained by Bloomberg News.
In case you havent seen a sales report these days, February MTD sales are a total disaster, Jerry Murray, Wal- Marts vice president of finance and logistics, said in a Feb. 12 e-mail to other executives, referring to month-to-date sales. The worst start to a month I have seen in my ~7 years with the company.
Wal-Mart and discounters such as Family Dollar Stores Inc. are bracing for a rise in the payroll tax to take a bigger bite from the paychecks of shoppers already dealing with elevated unemployment. The worlds largest retailers struggles come after executives expected a strong start to February because of the Super Bowl, milder weather and paycheck cycles, according to the minutes of a Feb. 1 officers meeting Bloomberg obtained.
Murrays comments about February sales follow disappointing results from January, a month that Cameron Geiger, senior vice president of Wal-Mart U.S. Replenishment, said he was relieved to see end, according to a separate internal e-mail obtained by Bloomberg News.
Have you ever had one of those weeks where your best- prepared plans werent good enough to accomplish everything you set out to do? Geiger asked in a Feb. 1 e-mail to executives. Well, we just had one of those weeks here at Walmart U.S. Where are all the customers? And wheres their money?
more...
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-15/wal-mart-executives-sweat-slow-february-start-in-e-mails.html
Maybe people don't have any money to spend
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)I wouldn't even want to be caught THINKING such a thing, let alone making a public statement of that nature....
unless this is code to say that, why yes, this IS a Lehman moment, so get under your bomb shelter....
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I think we will be celebrating the lunar New Year (the new moon was quite dramatic Wednesday night), the meteor in Russia, and all things celestial in this weekend's thread. See you then!
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)The European Union is attempting to tax Londons financial firms through the back door with its transactions levy and should be stopped by the U.K. government, according to British banks and fund managers.
The EU proposes to tax stock and bond trades at 0.1 percent for any transactions involving 11 nations, including France and Germany, under plans announced by EU Tax Commissioner Algirdas Semeta in Brussels yesterday. To escape the tax entirely, firms in other nations would have to cease financial-services business with the 11 countries involved.
We continue to support the U.K. governments refusal to participate in this proposal, the British Bankers Association said yesterday in an e-mailed statement. We urge that they remain vigilant to ensure that the application of the tax will not damage the City by the back door.
The City, as the London district is known, is the worlds number one financial center, according to consulting firm Z/Yen Group Ltd. and has opposed attempts by EU policy makers to increase regulation and raise revenue from its activities since the financial crisis of 2008. The City is already under scrutiny by U.K. and U.S. lawmakers after scandals including interest rate-rigging across the industry, money laundering settlements at HSBC Holdings Plc and Standard Chartered Plc and trading losses at UBS AG and JPMorgan Chase & Co.s London operations.
The EU proposal would levy a 0.01 percent charge on derivative trades as well as the 0.1 percent charge on stock and bond trades that involve one of the participating countries, regardless of where the transaction takes place. It would exclude day-to-day transactions by individuals and non-financial firms; primary offerings of stocks and bonds; and trades with central banks...
/... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-15/eu-s-transactions-levy-a-back-door-tax-on-london-u-k-firms-say.html
Whiners.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Tax the City. Tax the Bastards!
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Consumer activists were rattled Monday after the FTC released a report on widespread credit reporting errors.
According to the agency, as many as one in five consumers have errors on their credit reports that could hinder their ability to apply for new credit or stick them with sky high interest rates.
The report was highlighted in a fascinating 60 Minutes segment by CBS' Steve Kroft.
"Besides having financial consequences, the whole dispute process takes an emotional toll on people," Kroft said in an extended interview.
"It's just really hard sometimes to get these things fixed. You feel like you're up against this machine and there's no way to break through. After a while I think people sometimes start to question their own sanity.... so we decided to show the consumer what it's like."
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/inside-the-world-of-credit-reporting-ftc-cbs-kroft-2013-2?op=1#ixzz2KyDLGbbj
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Not that I know if they do or not....
Bankers just don't care about anything...it's not their money at risk, any more.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Editor's Note: In his 2012 State of The Union address, President Obama spoke of American homeowners abused by unscrupulous banks and financial institutions. Have they gotten justice? What follows is the first in a new series examiningforeclosure settlements and the disturbing patterns of incomptency, malfeasance, and conflicts of interest which have marked their execution. Yves Smith of Naked Capitalism takes a deep dive into the mire of America's mortage industry and investigates the continued suffering of the public at the hands of greedy predators...
SEE LINK
DemReadingDU
(16,001 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)hmmmm
Demeter
(85,373 posts)...The big question on infrastructure is whether the White House is correctly reading the politics of the moment. Could Congressional Republicans be ready to sign on to some form of large-scale investment in the nations transportation and energy infrastructure? Or is Obama tilting at windmills (literally, in this case).
It comes as we may be approaching the end of a five year period in which investing in the nations physical infrastructure has been something close to a free lunch. With interest rates near all-time lows and millions of construction workers unemployed, the last few years have been a time that it would have been a historical bargain for the United States to do upgrades to roads, bridges, and airports that will eventually need to take place anyway. It has been a political breakdownin particular conservatives view of almost any non-defense federal spending as wastefulstanding in the way.
This graph shows total private fixed investment relative to the nations potential GDP, going back to 1949. (Thats how much the private sector is spending on both houses and commercial installations). After averaging 15.5 percent from 1949 to 2007, private investment fell as low as 10.6 percent in the economic collapse starting in 2008 (it was 12.2 percent at the end of 2012).
In other words, for the last few years private construction activity has been far below its historic norms. And so long as the private sector isnt building houses and office buildings and factories, the government can build without crowding out private investment. But that window might not last much longer; at the current pace, private investment will be back to its historical average in another few years. Its not now or never, exactly, but it very likely will be cheaper now to spruce up the nations transportation and energy infrastructure than it will be in the not-too-distant future...
THERE ISN'T AN OPPORTUNITY TO HELP ORDINARY PEOPLE THAT CONGRESS WON'T MISS, IF NOT MAKE FOREVER IMPOSSIBLE FOR GENERATIONS...
Demeter
(85,373 posts)A study conducted by Edward N. Wolff for the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College in March 2010 made the following findings:
Debt was the most evenly distributed component of household wealth, with the bottom 90 percent of households responsible for 73 percent of total indebtedness.
Wealth concentration in too few hands while the general populace is saddled with too much debt to buy the goods and services produced by the corporations, is a replay of the conditions leading to the crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression.
Writing in his book, The Worldly Philosophers, Robert Heilbroner explained the situation leading up to the depression of the 1930s:
In both eras, Wall Street ceased being an allocator of capital to worthy enterprises and became an institutionalized system of rigged wealth transfer. The primary artifices this time around included issuing knowingly false stock research; lining up large institutional clients to buy at predetermined prices (laddering) on the first day of a new issue of stock this made the price appear to soar and thus sucked in the small investor; threatening to take the stock brokers commission away (penalty bid) if the broker let the small investor take profits in the newly issued stock the practice was known as flipping and was reserved for the big boys.
When the tech mania went bust and the rigged game was revealed, the small investor left in droves. Wall Street, with the Feds able assistance, fueled the next bubble housing and crafted complex derivatives to turn this market into a cash cow for Wall Street and foreclosures for Main Street. And, we are just now learning some of the details about how even interest rates were rigged against the little guy the Libor scandal.
The January 21, 2010 Supreme Court decision to allow corporations to have staggering financial influence in our elections (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) should send a bone chilling message: help is not on the way from Washington. The end game of this massive wealth concentration is long-term deflation, economic misery and multiple generations who will look back on us as the hapless society who couldnt tame the Wall Street greed machine for want of a plan and the will to implement it.
Below I offer ten ideas to take individual charge of taming the Wall Street beast. And, just to be clear to those perched on the edge of their seats preparing to scream Socialist!, Im not suggesting redistributing wealth; Im suggesting putting the wealth back into the hands from which it was taken in a rigged wealth transfer scheme.:
(1) Shorten Your Home Mortgage
(2) Think Local AKA MOVE YOUR MONEY
(3) Start a Business ON THE SIDE, JUST IN CASE OF LAYOFF
(4) Invest Wisely GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!
(5) Check Out Credit Union Membership
(6) Dont Use Credit Cards from Corporations That Abuse You
(7) Brand Attacks OR BOYCOTT FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES
(8) Return the Courts to Workers FIGHT MANDATORY ARBITRATION
(9) Complain
(10) Run for Office
DETAILS AT LINK--THAT LAST STEP CANNOT BE OVER-EMPHASIZED, AND WE NEED TO START IN OUR OWN DAMN PARTY. IF THAT DOESN'T WORK, THEN A PEOPLE'S PARTY WILL NEED TO ARISE...
Demeter
(85,373 posts)President Obama might as well drape the White House with a giant banner declaring in bold red type: Drop Dead 99 Percent. A pattern is emerging in the nominations coming out of the Oval Office. If youve played a role in collapsing a major bank, the President has a top slot for you. But only millionaires and billionaires need apply. Union busting scores extra points.
[LU]Of course, there are other ways to get a salary and a pension from the taxpayer and play a leadership role in pulling the country out of the greatest banking collapse since the Great Depression. Obama is nothing if not an equal opportunity employer of opportunists. If you didnt personally collapse anything but were white collar defense lawyer to those that did, you can become the head of Wall Streets regulator. Mary Jo White, partner at corporate law firm Debevoise and Plimpton, whose clients include JPMorgan, UBS, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, has been nominated by the President to head the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In 1988, Penny Pritzkers uncle, Jay Pritzker, and his long time friend, Alvin Dworman, acquired a failing thrift, the Lyons Savings Bank of Countryside, Illinois. The bank was renamed Superior Bank. This occurred during the time that the Federal Home Loan Bank Board was going full throttle to conceal the savings and loan crisis. It gave Pritzker and Dworman a sweetheart deal. The two put up $21.25 million each and bought bank assets of $1.5 billion. According to media reports, the deal also garnered $645 million in tax credits.
Penny Pritzker served as the Chair of the bank and later on the Board of its holding company as the bank went on a subprime loan securitization binge and used accounting tricks to hide its enormous losses. In 2001, Superior collapsed. The Government Accountability Office assigned the collapse to bad management, writing in its February 7, 2002 report:
The primary responsibility for the failure of Superior Bank resides with its owners and managers. Superiors business strategy of originating and securitizing subprime loans appeared to have led to high earnings, but more importantly its strategy resulted in a high concentration of extremely risky assets. This high concentration of risky assets and the improper valuation of these assets ultimately led to Superiors failure.
The FDIC eventually settled with the Pritzker and Dworman interests for an agreement that they would pay back $350 million over 15 years, with the first $100 million paid up front.
Writing at In These Times, David Moberg reported on November 8, 2002:
Demeter
(85,373 posts)The Wall Street cartel that has for decades kidnapped the process of nominating anyone who has anything to do with money and high office in the United States (Federal Reserve Chair, New York Fed President, U.S. Treasury Secretary, Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its General Counsel) has a powerful spin machine running full throttle to secure the confirmation of Mary Jo White to head the SEC. Take the headlines and story threads that have been regurgitated throughout the business media since President Obama nominated White on January 24. The spin goes like this: shes a former Federal prosecutor and shes tough. Heres how the widely circulated story by the Associated Press framed the nomination in its lead paragraph:
Even members of the business press who eventually got around to questioning Whites conflicts of interest as a corporate lawyer continued to suggest that White left government work after many years as a Federal prosecutor and only then became a corporate lawyer working for Wall Streets largest firms. A correct headline would have been: corporate lawyer with 36 year ties to one law firm representing Wall Street to head SEC. The real problem with Mary Jo White as a nominee to head the SEC is that her revolving door has been spinning in and out of the corporate law firm Debevoise and Plimpton for 36 years. She didnt go through the revolving door once; she went through the revolving door at least three times. When someone leaves a white collar criminal defense law firm three times to work for the agency prosecuting those federal criminal cases, red flags need to go up.
This is Whites timeline in and out of Debevoise and in and out of the federal prosecutor offices:
2002 to Present: Debevoise and Plimpton partner, representing some of Wall Streets largest firms: JPMorgan, UBS, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley.
1993 to 2002: U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (where Wall Street is located);
1990 to 1993: First Assistant United States Attorney and Acting United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York;
1983 to 1990: Litigation partner at Debevoise and Plimpton, where she focused on white collar defense work, SEC enforcement matters and other corporate work.
1978 to 1981: Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York, where she became Chief Appellate Attorney of the Criminal Division.
1976 to 1978: Associate at Debevoise and Plimpton.
In May 2008, I reported on the fact that some of Wall Streets most powerful law firms were flooding money into the Obama campaign for President. In his 2011-2012 campaign, the largest Wall Street firms abandoned him and put their big bucks on Mitt Romney. But the President wasnt abandoned by all of Wall Street. The largest law firms that represent Wall Street continued to flood the Obama campaign coffers in 2011-2012. There is no industry in America that is better plugged in than giant corporate law firms. Some have 2,000 partners and attorneys. They know Wall Streets darkest secrets and they have a Rolodex that reaches around the world. They dont bet on losers. And they expect a lot in return.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Tim Geithner, who recently stepped down as U.S. Treasury Secretary, is moving on. He wont be getting that big pay day directly from a Wall Street firm that so many expected; but he will be getting that big payday.
Geithner has been named a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a think tank whose Co-Chairman is Robert Rubin, a former U.S.Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton and the man who played a pivotal role on Citigroups Board during the financial crisis. Citigroup collapsed into the arms of the U.S. government with a bailout that exceeded $2.5 trillion, including equity infusions, assets guarantees and loans from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which Geithner headed before becoming U.S. Treasury Secretary. The SEC charged Citigroup with lying about its exposure to subprime debt by $39 billion and imposed a paltry fine of $75 million to settle the matter. It remains embroiled in multiple other lawsuits alleging fraud.
Geithners cozy role with Citigroup has been a topic of three major books. According to Ron Suskind in Confidence Men, Geithner ignored a directive from President Obama to wind down Citigroup, infusing it with enormous bailout funds instead. In Neil Barofskys Bailout, Geithner is the evil genius using the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to foam the runways for the banks, slowing down the foreclosure stream so the big banks could stay afloat, with no genuine goal to help struggling families stay in their homes. Then came Sheila Bair, former head of the FDIC during the crisis, portraying Geithner in Bull By the Horns as a Citigroup messenger boy.
Another key name from the financial crisis pops up at CFR. The Honorary Vice Chairman of Geithners new employer is Maurice R. (Hank) Greenberg, the former Chairman and CEO of AIG, the company that collapsed into the arms of the U.S. taxpayer with a bailout of $182 billion. Hank Greenberg even has a think tank named after him at CFR: the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies...
MORE
Demeter
(85,373 posts)http://wallstreetonparade.com/2013/01/why-did-treasury-nominee-jack-lew-leave-nyu-for-scandal-plagued-citigroup/
...Lew only joined Citigroup in June of 2006. The company had set its course for disaster eight years earlier when, in defiance of existing law, Sanford (Sandy) Weill merged his insurance company, Travelers Group, which owned an investment bank (Solomon Brothers) and a retail stock brokerage firm (Smith Barney) with the commercial bank, Citicorp. This was the very combination outlawed under the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to prevent banks holding FDIC insured deposits from merging with firms engaging in the much riskier securities or insurance underwriting.
The Glass-Steagall Act had been put in place to prevent the Wall Street abuses that led to the 1929 to 1932 Wall Street crash which saw a 90 percent decline in stock prices and led to the Great Depression. The Citigroup merger effectively forced the hand of Congress to repeal the legislation in 1999 under the rubric of modernization or force the breakup of a powerful and politically connected company.
The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act occurred under the Clinton administration. The U.S. Treasury Secretary at the time, Robert Rubin, played a leading part in advocating for the repeal. Rubin went straight from public service to join Citigroup and collect $120 million in compensation over the next eight years for non-management work. According to the Washington Post, it was Rubin who recommended Lew for the post at Citigroup.
But the question is, why would Lew accept any job with a company that had been splashed through the business press and law journals as a serial predator for years. One would have had to live on a different planet not to know about Citigroups scandalous past and serial and ongoing brushes with regulators.
At the time of the Citigroup job offer, Lew was the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at New York University, a post he had held from 2001 to June of 2006. Why leave a prestigious university to join a scandal-plagued financial institution?
According to the Associated Press, Lew holds an undergraduate degree from Harvard and a law degree from Georgetown University. Surely a man with those credentials reads the business press and a few law journals. From 2002 onward, Citigroup was fined, sanctioned and profiled in the media constantly as a financial institution with a corrupted culture. Below is just a sampling of the milestones.
If Jack Lews judgment was so clouded as to leave a well paying university position for a job offer that would pay him millions to join a company perpetually known for skirting the law and having its reputation dragged through the mud, why should we now trust his judgment in the critical role of U.S. Treasury Secretary?
Jack Lews Cayman Islands Problem Just Got a Lot Bigger
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2013/02/jack-lew%E2%80%99s-cayman-islands-problem-just-got-a-lot-bigger/
Senator Chuck Grassley set off a media uproar on Friday when he reported that President Obamas nominee for Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew, had owned a Citigroup investment housed at a Cayman Islands building that President Obama has previously suggested was a tax scam due to almost 19,000 corporations being registered at that address. Lew had worked as a Deputy Secretary in the State Department for almost two years before he sold the investment in 2010 after returning to government service from Citigroup.
The response from the White House has been that Lew made this disclosure known to the Senate for his confirmation hearing in 2010 and the Senators didnt raise any issues with it....
We first reported Lews investment in the Citigroup Venture Capital International (CVCI) private equity fund on January 14 of this year. In that report, we attached the financial disclosure report that Lew had provided to the U.S. Senate for vetting his nomination for Director of the Office of Management and Budget on September 16, 2010. Our finding:
One section of the documents refers to Business Relationships and indicates that Lew had been a limited partner from 2007 through the date of the hearing on September 16, 2010 in the CVCI Private Equity Fund. There is nothing in these documents to enlighten either the Senators or the public that CVCI is an acronym for Citi Venture Capital International, a unit of Citigroup investing billions in foreign companies in hopes of making its limited partners very wealthy. (A limited partner in a private equity fund is synonymous with being an investor in the fund.)
...The question is not just why Lew didnt have a problem investing in the Cayman Islands, it is also why Lew felt no ethical conflict in accepting a $950,000 bonus from Citigroup just prior to taking his post at the State Department on February 4, 2009. At that point in time, Lew knew full well that Citigroup was an insolvent institution and the money he accepted was taxpayer money and a highly improper gift to him. His division was at the core of Citigroups collapse.
Senator Orrin Hatch Drops a Bombshell at Jack Lews Confirmation Hearing
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2013/02/senator-orrin-hatch-drops-a-bombshell-at-jack-lew%E2%80%99s-confirmation-hearing/
At last we know how the grease is funneled to that revolving door between Wall Street and Washington. One only gets a $940,000 bonus from Wall Streets Citigroup if you can land a full time high level position with the United States Government or a regulatory body. It cant be just a part-time job, mind you; and you cant be rank and file. Citigroups dangling carrot will only pay $940,000 if the company can add a high level government mover and shaker to their gold-plated Rolodex.
This was the bombshell dropped by Senator Orrin Hatch yesterday in Jack Lews confirmation hearing for one of the highest offices in the land Secretary of the U.S. Treasury who will also head the body that makes critical decisions impacting Citigroup the Financial Stability Oversight Council. (Lew held an executive position with Citigroup at the time of its collapse.)
Hatch made the disclosure as follows:
Public shame has clearly lost its utility as a deterrent to repugnant behavior when it comes to Wall Street. Jack Lew proved the point yesterday. Without offering an apology or the return of the $940,000 bonus paid with taxpayers funds, the unflappable Lew calmly and politely answered the questions. Unfortunately, his answers lacked both substance and credibility. One of Lews many jobs at the collapsing division of Citigroup he headed was overseeing the Human Resources Department. But on the topic of his own personal performance assessment, this is what he told the Senate chambers:
As for his compensation, Lew said: I do believe it was comparable to compensation for people in positions like mine in the industry.
While its true that a lot of bailed out Wall Street firms paid employees obscene bonuses with taxpayer money, its unlikely that there are a lot of employees that were contractually bound to get those bonuses only upon moving through the revolving door to a top post in Washington. Lew brazenly ignored that question completely as he did with many other uncomfortable questions...
THIS WEBSITE IS A GOLD MINE!
Tansy_Gold
(17,902 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)only more political, less wonky.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. Human beings are people; corporations are legal fictions.
We, the People of the United States of America, reject the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United and other related cases, and move to amend our Constitution to firmly establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court is misguided in principle, and wrong on the law. In a democracy, the people rule.
We Move to Amend.
~Supreme Court Justice Stevens, January 2010
SIGN AT LINK:
http://movetoamend.nationbuilder.com/petition
Demeter
(85,373 posts)In his response to the State of the Union, Sen. Marco Rubio said: This idea that our problems were caused by a government that was too small its just not true. In fact, a major cause of our recent downturn was a housing crisis created by reckless government policies.
For obvious reasons, this argument is very popular on the right, but theres precious little to back it up. The core claim can be a bit slippery, but it tends to go something like this: the existence and affordability goals of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the GSEs) and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) were a major reason we had a subprime-driven housing bubble and then a crash. The only problem? Pretty much all the evidence on the housing crisis shows that thats not true.
(As I dont believe Rubio is referencing them, Im putting to the side the complicated debate on interest rates being far too low for far too long and policy, or the idea that there wasnt enough U.S. government debt in the 2000s [!] to meet the demand for safe assets. Though those are the debates people actually engaged with these questions are studying.)
Lets go through some things we know:
1. Private markets, rather than the GSEs, created the subprime mortgage boom.
2. The Community Reinvestment Act and the GSEs affordability mission didnt cause the crisis.
3. Theres a lot of research to back this up and little against it.
4. Conservatives arguments tend to blur the definition of subprime.
5. The government policy that likely made an impact were deregulatory actions.
DETAILS AT LINK
Mike Konczal is a fellow with the Roosevelt Institute, and author of the blog Rortybomb.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Bruce Bartlett held senior policy roles in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations and served on the staffs of Representatives Jack Kemp and Ron Paul. He is the author of The Benefit and the Burden: Tax Reform Why We Need It and What It Will Take.
Last week, the investor David Einhorn sued Apple, in which his hedge fund has a large stake, over how the company can issue preferred stock. At the heart of the dispute is the $137 billion pile of cash that Apple has accumulated, and whether it could be used to better reward shareholders. Mr. Einhorns action highlights a growing problem: many corporations are holding vast amounts of cash and other liquid assets, using them neither for investment nor to benefit shareholders. These assets are largely earned and held overseas, and not subject to American taxes until the money is brought home. Such tax-avoidance techniques, while legal, have come under increasing political attack. On Thursday, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont introduced legislation to end deferral and force multinational companies to pay taxes on their foreign-source income.
According to the Federal Reserve, as of the third quarter of 2012 nonfinancial corporations in the United States held $1.7 trillion of liquid assets cash and securities that could easily be converted to cash. By any measure, corporate cash holdings appear to be high and rising. According to the Federal Reserve, nonfinancial corporations historically held liquid assets of 25 to 30 percent of their short-term liabilities. But this percentage began rising in 2001 and now tends to be in the 45 to 50 percent range. In the third quarter of 2012, it was 44.9 percent. A recent study by Juan Sánchez and Emircan Yurdagul of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis looked at the ratio of cash to assets at all publicly held nonfinancial, non-utility corporations. They found that, historically, such corporations held cash equal to about 6 percent of their assets, but that began rising in 1995 and is now more than 12 percent, as seen below.
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis analysis of Compustat data
While this may indicate that multinational corporations expect better growth potential among their foreign subsidiaries and plan additional offshore investments, a more likely explanation is tax-based. Under American tax law, corporate profits generated offshore are taxable, with a tax credit for taxes paid in foreign jurisdictions. But American taxes dont apply unless and until such profits are repatriated to the United States. Thus, as long as profits are held abroad, United States taxes are deferred indefinitely. A 2007 study in the Journal of Financial Economics found that among multinational corporations, those facing higher repatriation taxes tended to hold more cash abroad than those facing lower tax burdens. Moreover, cash holdings tend to be higher in countries with low taxes than those with high taxes. Tax sensitivity appears to be more pronounced among technology-based companies.
The major role of R.&D. in large cash holdings may reflect the greater opportunities for tax avoidance among businesses that can easily transfer intangible property abroad without having to move production operations or jobs to other countries. It is a simple matter for companies holding patents, copyrights or trademarks to transfer them to foreign subsidiaries and realize the profits accruing to them in lower-taxed jurisdictions.
MORE AT LINK
Demeter
(85,373 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)Shares of Herbalife (HLF) are up 20% in early trading after it was revealed late yesterday that billionaire investor Carl Icahn filed a 13D disclosing that he'd taken a 13% stake in the company.
Those familiar with the story of Herbalife understand that Icahn's move was likely driven by his ongoing and very public spat with fellow billionaire, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman. Ackman has a large short position in Herbalife, leaving him vulnerable to a short squeeze. In an instant classic on-air argument last month on CNBC, Ichan suggested that HLF could become "the mother of all short squeezes."
-snip-
The Icahn-Ackman brawl is the most public instance of what has become a recurring market theme: Hedge funds taking big positions then touting them on financial television. It makes for great theater but Lee Munson of Portfolio LLC and author of Rigged Money, says it's all part of a strange new world.
"Hedge funds back in the '80s and '90s used to be private, we used to be secretive. Nobody told anyone about their positions," Munson explains in the attached clip. "Nowadays you go on TV and you jack with the system."
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/icahn-vs-ackman-stay-away-stocks-manipulated-1-153741894.html
HLF is a pyramid scheme perpetuated by the Mormons, so I don't agree that it is the 1% playing with it so much as it is the cult which is has permeated the markets. But following this feud is an interesting way to learn how stocks can be manipulated.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I'm going to have to get a flask of rum to put around the grandpuppy's neck, when I take him to the dog park...
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)I might need to put on long sleeves to go to the liquor store.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)And you thought that a Hillary 2016 campaign was our worst nightmare? Even I never considered this.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/14/rahm-emanuel-toying-with-2016-presidential-run-sources-say.html?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=cheatsheet_morning&cid=newsletter%3Bemail%3Bcheatsheet_morning&utm_term=Cheat%20Sheet
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!!!
DemReadingDU
(16,001 posts)Tansy_Gold
(17,902 posts)But don't think some of us didn't see it coming. When he ran for Mayor, that had to be a stepping stone to something higher, much higher.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)He's got massive gravity pulling him down back into the swamp of Chicago.
MEANING OF CHICAGO:
Chicago is derived from the Native American tribe (Algonquian) and means: onion or skunk. It could also mean "Smells bad" depending on how it is used.
It refers to a place where there is skunks. In the ojibwe language, places of reference often end in the 'o' suffix and the root word is 'chigag' which refers to the skunk. So the translation would be or at least how i understand it in my ojibwe language is ' a place where the skunks come from, a place where there is skunks, a place where you find skunks' depending on how you would use the word in the ojibwe language...
ANOTHER THEORY:
Most people believe that the name Chicago came from Indian tribes meaning 'skunk' or 'wild onion' but there are also historians who have looked at other Indian tribes and found out that Chicago means great and powerful. They say Chicago was a word when refering to the Mississippi River, thunder, and a God of theirs...
YET ANOTHER:
The name Chicago is derived from the local Indian word chicagoua for the native garlic plant (not onion) Allium tricoccum. This garlic (in French: ail sauvage) grew in abundance on the south end of Lake Michigan on the wooded banks of the extensive river system which bore the same name, chicagoua. Father Gravier, a thorough student of the local Miami language, introduced the spelling chicagoua, or chicagou8, in the 1690`s, attempting to express the inflection which the Indians gave to the last syllable of the word.
The French who began arriving here in 1673 were probably confused by the Indian use of this name for several rivers. They usually wrote it as Chicagou. Gradually other names were given to the streams composing this system: Des Plaines, Saganashkee (Sag), Calumet (Grand and Little), Hickory Creek, Guillory (for the north branch of the present Chicago River), and Chicago or Portage River (for the south branch). Students of early Chicago history likewise tend to get confused, unaware of these name changes, but early French maps and narratives, when carefully interpreted, make it possible to discover who and what was where, and when.
As a name for a place, as distinct from a river, Chicagou appears first in Chicagoumeman, the native name for the mouth of the present Chicago River, where Fort Dearborn was built in 1803. As a name for a place where people lived, the simple Chicagou was first used by the French about 1685 for a Jesuit mission and French army post at the site of Marquette`s 1675 camp along the south branch. This interpretation, and the etymology of the name Chicago, derive largely from the memoirs of Henri Joutel, the soldier-naturalist associate of La Salle on his fatal last journey, 1684-1687, to Texas. Joutel spent nearly three weeks in the Chicagou area in 1687-88, and one of his first investigations was into the origin of this name which he had heard from La Salle and many others. His detailed description of the plant, its "ail sauvage" taste, its differences from the native onion and its maple forest habitat, point unambiguously to Allium tricoccum.
English accounts tracing the name to a "wild onion" date from after 1800, when different groups of Indians, mainly Potawatomi, had displaced the original Miami. In the Potawatomi language, chicago meant both the native garlic and the wild onion.
PUT THEM ALL TOGETHER, AND YOU GET A BIG POWERFUL STINK
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.