Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,274 posts)
Tue Apr 9, 2024, 03:41 PM Apr 9

Editorial: Small nuclear plants may be key to state's energy mix (heraldnet)

The state allocated $25 million to fund review of a modular nuclear reactor as a climate solution.

Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1:30am Opinion In Our View

By The Herald Editorial Board


Among the projects funded in the supplemental budgets signed Friday by Gov. Jay Inslee was a $25 million feasibility and review study that will consider the pros and cons of building a small modular nuclear reactor near the state’s only commercial nuclear energy facility, located north of Richland.

The $25 million is part of the supplemental capital budget, an allocation from the revenue generated from the Climate Commitment Act’s cap-and-invest program, which since last year has been holding quarterly auctions of carbon credits, paid by the state’s heaviest carbon polluters. That money in last year’s and this year’s budgets is being used for a range of solutions for clean energy production, pollution and greenhouse gas reduction and correction of more than a century of harmful impacts from fossil fuels, in particular for disadvantaged communities, all meant to address the emissions’ impacts on a warming planet and people’s health.

Admittedly, nuclear energy is among the more controversial technologies with potential for joining the mix of cleaner sources of energy — meaning less responsible for greenhouse gas emissions — on which the state relies, including hydropower, solar, wind and energy storage projects.

The $25 million project faced a last-minute objection from an environmental group and a state tribal confederation that urged Inslee to veto the project. Columbia Riverkeeper, a longtime watchdog and critic of the lagging cleanup efforts at the federal Hanford Nuclear Site, also north of Richland; and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation sought the governor’s veto.
***
more: https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/editorial-small-nuclear-plants-may-be-key-to-states-energy-mix/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Editorial: Small nuclear plants may be key to state's energy mix (heraldnet) (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Apr 9 OP
Good. nt CoopersDad Apr 9 #1
It is patently dishonest as "but her emails" media does... NNadir Apr 9 #2
I have read that France developed a design for a nuclear plant that worked well, and repeated it everywhere, but spike jones Apr 9 #3

NNadir

(33,532 posts)
2. It is patently dishonest as "but her emails" media does...
Tue Apr 9, 2024, 04:11 PM
Apr 9

...to call antinuke organizations "environmentalist groups." It is the equivalent of calling antivaxxers "medical organizations."

spike jones

(1,682 posts)
3. I have read that France developed a design for a nuclear plant that worked well, and repeated it everywhere, but
Tue Apr 9, 2024, 05:35 PM
Apr 9

I believe that all the plants in USA have been designed as one-off units. All are different, thus more expensive and less reliable.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Editorial: Small nuclear ...