Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumExplaining Israel’s Reaction to the U.N.’s pro-Palestinian Vote
Explaining Israels Reaction to the U.N.s pro-Palestinian VoteDec 3, 2012 12:00 AM EST
The loss was inevitable. The question is, what to do next.
Israels leaders stayed surprisingly calm last week. In the weeks leading up to Thursdays vote on upgrading the Palestinians U.N. membership, a few senior Israeli officials drafted a position paper focusing on how the government should respond. The U.N. move, the writers warned, threatened to severely damage Israels credibility and undermine the Jewish states position in future peace negotiations. But more than that, they added, the initiative could open the door to war-crimes prosecutions against Israelis at the International Criminal Court. The five-page paper, dated Nov. 12 and obtained by Newsweek, advised that if the vote went ahead, Israel should exact a heavy price from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbasa price to include dismantling his Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority. A softer approach would amount to waving a white flag and admitting that the Israeli leadership is unable to rise to the challenge, the writers concluded.
The upgrade, which the General Assembly approved last week by a huge majority, is a bitter pill for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It includes not only a boost in the Palestinians status from (U.N. jargon alert!) non-member observer entity to non-member observer state, but also a recognition of their right to all of the West Bank and Gaza, including territory that Israelis have settled since 1967. Even some dovish Israelis have problems with the resolutions sweep. And yet Israels responsea dismissive statement from the prime minister and the floating of plans to build thousands of new housing units in the West Bankfell well short of the threats to topple Abbas. This is a meaningless resolution that wont change anything on the ground, Netanyahu said in a handout just before the vote.
What cooled things down? Although Israeli governments often speak in multiple voices, internal disagreements dont explain the change. To be sure, the officials who drafted the position paper work for Israels Foreign Ministry, where the boss, Avigdor Lieberman, is among the governments hardest hardliners. For months Lieberman was saying that Abbas should be toppled. But Netanyahu was also threatening tough action against the Palestinians as recently as a few weeks ago. And when the rhetoric started softening in the days leading up to the vote, Liebermans tone moderated as well.
Instead, the shift evidently reflects something akin to panic in Israeli governing circlesand a desperate bid to contain the damage. That Israel would lose the General Assembly vote was a foregone conclusion. Netanyahu voiced hope for retaining the support of a qualitative minority, meaning the worlds leading democratic countries. But as even that vision crumbledamong Western democracies, only the United States and Canada ended up voting against the resolutiona sense of isolation crept over the Jewish state, a kind of déjà vu from the dark days of the 1970s. There was a realization at some point that a harsh response would make it worse, a senior Israeli official tells Newsweek, describing internal discussions before the vote. And we cant afford that. It would backfire on us.
Full article:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/12/02/explaining-israel-s-reaction-to-the-u-n-s-pro-palestinian-vote.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 895 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Explaining Israel’s Reaction to the U.N.’s pro-Palestinian Vote (Original Post)
DonViejo
Dec 2012
OP
bemildred
(90,061 posts)1. Heckuva job Bibi. nt
tech3149
(4,452 posts)2. I am always fearful of commenting on any I/P post
It doesn't seem to matter how dispassionate, objective, or based on historical fact, you will get flamed. I think the final quote from the OP says it all.
There was a realization at some point that a harsh response would make it worse, a senior Israeli official tells Newsweek, describing internal discussions before the vote. And we cant afford that. It would backfire on us.