Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JudyM

(29,294 posts)
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 07:38 PM Mar 2016

Stunning change in Ohio polls!

Bernie is Bernin up Ohio!! Closing in by the minute...

Ohio Democratic Presidential Primary Quinnipiac Clinton 51, Sanders 46 Clinton +5
Ohio Democratic Presidential Primary Monmouth Clinton 54, Sanders 40 Clinton +14
Ohio Democratic Presidential Primary PPP (D)* Clinton 46, Sanders 41 Clinton +5
Ohio Democratic Presidential Primary ARG Clinton 52, Sanders 45 Clinton +7


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stunning change in Ohio polls! (Original Post) JudyM Mar 2016 OP
He's totally going to catch her two weeks from now! Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #1
LOL livetohike Mar 2016 #2
Naw, gonna catch her tomorrow. Punkingal Mar 2016 #3
Hoping so, or at least closing in as tight as these polls. JudyM Mar 2016 #4
With this velocity, he's likely already past her. Barack_America Mar 2016 #6
& started a canvass out of Mansfield/Shelby, need to get canvassers and friends to tell friends! JudyM Mar 2016 #15
what was the spread the night before Michigan? GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #5
Roughly 4X this OH spread. Barack_America Mar 2016 #7
wow GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #8
Yep. The revolution apparently can't be polled. Barack_America Mar 2016 #9
The Revolution Go Vols Mar 2016 #10
The "swing" was there from the beginning of this campaign at 51% Samantha Mar 2016 #11
GOTV, Buckeyes!! AzDar Mar 2016 #12
Unfortunately negative advertising will do that. ucrdem Mar 2016 #13
why is that negative? it never mentions your person. None of his ads do. GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Chichiri Mar 2016 #16

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
6. With this velocity, he's likely already past her.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:09 PM
Mar 2016

Just got to get those voters to the polls. Fortunately, he just opened up 19 GOTV centers throughout OH.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
5. what was the spread the night before Michigan?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:07 PM
Mar 2016

Found it: 55 clinton 42 sanders (monmouth)

Ohio is totally in range.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
7. Roughly 4X this OH spread.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:13 PM
Mar 2016


Monmouth was the outlier. Half the spread of the rest of the polls. The average was about +21 for Clinton.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
9. Yep. The revolution apparently can't be polled.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:24 PM
Mar 2016

Really though, the key here is an amazing swing towards Bernie among independent voters.

A wiser party would recognize that as general election gold and latch on to it.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
11. The "swing" was there from the beginning of this campaign at 51%
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:47 PM
Mar 2016

of Independents voting for Bernie Sanders. I posted that here at that time. The difference between then and now is that people (especially the pollsters) woke up last week after the Michigan vote and found out the truth of the matter. With the mix of the Dems he is carrying, the increased amount of Independents he is now carrying (about 3 or 4 percent more as of this moment!) and the Republicans crossing over, I don't think what we are seeing now is anyway representative of what will happen tomorrow. Just my 2 cents.

Sam

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
13. Unfortunately negative advertising will do that.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:01 AM
Mar 2016

The kind Sanders promised not to use. Well, he used it in Michigan, and he won, so I imagine he's using it in OH.


GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
14. why is that negative? it never mentions your person. None of his ads do.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:20 AM
Mar 2016

THIS is a negative ad -- 1. focuses exclusively on separating a specific candidate from their base, 2. quotes out of context in an impactful way, 3. frames the whole thing with a bogus question that they force the answer on. Sanders has never done such an ad and has no Super PACs.

Response to JudyM (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Stunning change in Ohio p...