2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFirst Half of the Primary Season: What Patterns Can We Point To?
Rather than talk about each candidate's chances of winning the nomination in terms of percentages (e.g., so-and-so has a 99% chance of winning), let's consider some undeniable patterns.
Clinton does best in larger, more diverse states and "blue" areas (such as St. Louis and Atlanta). Sanders does best in smaller, less diverse states and "red" areas (such as rural Missouri and rural Georgia).
Clinton does better among registered Democrats. Sanders does better among independents.
Clinton does better in primaries. Sanders does better in caucuses.
Most of the remaining contests are closed and most are primaries. The remaining contests with 100+ delegates are WA, NY, MD, PA, CA and NJ. WA has a caucus and the rest have primaries.
So, is there any reason to believe those various patterns will get flipped upside down?
brooklynite
(94,852 posts)Hillary does better
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I just think when people talk about so-and-so having X% chance of winning, it's too abstract and subjective. It's best, I think, to consider patterns and whether or not there's any reason to think those patterns won't continue. Tonight's results will likely reinforce the patterns. And they'll likely be in line with what polling suggested was going to happen.
calguy
(5,344 posts)Has been greatly over exaggerated to say the least.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,718 posts)The above observation is incontrovertible.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Apart from some caucus wins (Denver, Minneapolis), the only "major" urban area he's won is Oklahoma City. OK, fine, Grand Rapids. He will probably win Salt Lake City tonight, though, again, a caucus. He just got his clock cleaned in Phoenix and Tuscon.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,718 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)He might win Seattle. He won't win Milwaukee, though he might win Wisconsin.
By the time Portland gets around, the things will already be sealed, so...
California? Come on.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)People are ok with Media in this country favoring one and determining elections. Too bad that we are going to have a President Trump because people would rather have a fucked up media lying and devoting 10x more coverage to 1 Trump than Clinton and 100x more than Sanders. Too many of you are more focused on getting win for primary and ignoring the major corruption and bias media played in this election, it is going to come back and bite country in ass in the GE.
Americans in general are stupid and largely uninformed on issues. Most voters get their news from cable TV and not internet. So don't cheer about Hillary winning this primary when she got a clear bias in the media. Trump is getting more of bias and they already are dropping Hillary coverage over covering Trump.