2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumReport: Sanders opposed going after Clinton on speeches, advisors pushed him to do it
The first pre-mortem is out, in the NY Times:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/04/us/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton.html
...
In October, as they gathered at a hotel outside Las Vegas to prepare for the first Democratic debate, Mr. Sanderss advisers urged him to challenge Mrs. Clinton over accepting $675,000 from Goldman Sachs for delivering three speeches, according to two Sanders advisers. They thought the speaking fees meshed with the senators message about Wall Street excess and a rigged America. But Mr. Sanders, hunched over a U-shaped conference table, rejected it as a personal attack on Mrs. Clintons income the sort of character assault he has long opposed. She has the right to make money, he offered.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/04/us/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton.html
The article also shows the campaign advisors blaming Sanders for not working hard enough on the campaign trail and doing too many big rallies. Devine and Weaver are poison.
The senator won New Hampshire by more than 20 percentage points.
Mr. Sanders also resisted pleas to do the kind of retail-style campaigning that Iowa voters like. He wanted to do more large rallies instead, even though many Iowans like politicians winning them over face-to-face.
Bernie would say, If Im at a diner having a cup of coffee, I dont want candidates coming up talking to me, Mr. Devine said.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)all speech transcripts, not just Goldman Sachs.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)You have a lot of illustrious company.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)We actually support a candidate that embodies DEM foundational principles... and one that embraces the liberal / progressive label, and that's Bernie
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)You would know best... your candidate embodies empty, she lives and breathes political expediency and portrayed in the video I linked
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)be taking money hand over fist from giant corporation.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)that his message attracts. Instead, I've seen over and over how the Sanders campaign is a pet project of a bunch of middle-aged white dudes. Campaign disclosures reveal that his core team is all men; how "progressive" of him, right? Tad Devine is a Democratic Party insider who has worked on 5 presidential campaigns so far. Jeff Weaver sounds like this is his first time speaking in public sometimes. Both men are an embarrassment to the campaign and the candidate they represent. Theirs is the politics of resentment.
Meanwhile, Hillary's staff is much more diverse, on both race and gender, and her campaign efforts are being run by people like Robby Mook, who's only a year older than I am. Pictures from her campaign headquarters routinely reveal a staff that's nowhere near as gray as the one running the Sanders show.
The only reason that Sanders is winning the youth vote is that he did a bunch of pre-campaign poll testing to see what was popular with them, and then made those things the center of his platform. Maybe he should have poll-tested what issues matter to older voters, and consistent voters, rather than unreliable Millennials who use politics as just another temporary hobby at which they play sometimes.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)Bernie's campaign on ideas is winning hearts and minds, how are his staff encouraging younger voters to follow him and not HRC?
Tell HRC to become honest, to not take $$ from special interests that are counter to liberal / progressive ideals, then your 'point' would make sense...
Bernie having a better staff and smarter folks isn't a problem, it's your problem to figure out how to beat his message and the surge being created as this primary process moves along
Have a good day!
JSup
(740 posts)...some unreasonable hope that Bernie hasn't let the people that run his campaign corrupt him; but it really does seem like they're leading him through a cesspool.