Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Current Delegate Totals: Clinton - 1739 / Sanders - 1070 / Need to nominate: 2,383. (Original Post) Alfresco Apr 2016 OP
minus the SDs dana_b Apr 2016 #1
Nope. The superdelegates are part of the equation. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #6
SD's already voted? go figure... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #11
Even if the supers break in the same proportion as the pledged, Sanders is in deep trouble. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #14
Laughable... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #20
Tick tick indeed. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #23
Notes... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #24
You want to go full on quantitative? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #25
why you have inside info on a fixed (in HRC's) favor or something bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #27
'Full quantitative'... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #32
Look, you were complaining that HRC supporters don't like looking at the numbers... Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #33
I don't complain about facts and data... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #35
Look, the point is the pledged delegate winner will be the nominee. morningfog Apr 2016 #36
I see you are using the inflated numbers. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #2
As if we don't know better casperthegm Apr 2016 #21
Wrong... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #3
... NuclearDem Apr 2016 #10
Supers can switch if they feel the need or the Bern. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #4
But, they aren't feeling the bern -- in huge numbers. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #9
It's April lets see what happens in June and July Kalidurga Apr 2016 #13
Well, they better if they don't want to ruin the party Schema Thing Apr 2016 #22
Superdelegates? All I need to know. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #5
Somewhere there must be a wall with the sad, pathetic little remains of this kind of thing djean111 Apr 2016 #7
"pie in the sky" fun n serious Apr 2016 #8
+1 Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author JackRiddler Apr 2016 #12
Super delegates have not voted yet. But you knew that. jillan Apr 2016 #16
It's just weird that Clinton supporters feel the need to use Superdelegates to inflate the lead. Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #17
Why not? fun n serious Apr 2016 #18
Kind of like Trump feeling the need to talk about how big his hands are . . . . . . .similar thing pdsimdars Apr 2016 #28
At the beginning of the primary season, after the initial states voted/caucused SFnomad Apr 2016 #19
"stealing the election" lastone Apr 2016 #29
I explained myself in the post SFnomad Apr 2016 #31
LOL you sure did and it made NO SENSE! lastone Apr 2016 #34
you should just report the PLEDGED delegates. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #26
I'm sick of them MSM and Hillary supporters (I saw their other post in their group) bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #30
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
6. Nope. The superdelegates are part of the equation.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:59 PM
Apr 2016

The Sanders camp doesn't like that (today), but that's reality.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
14. Even if the supers break in the same proportion as the pledged, Sanders is in deep trouble.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:06 PM
Apr 2016

You guys keep looking for rainbows where there aren't any.

I guess it's better than being depressed.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
20. Laughable...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:16 PM
Apr 2016

SD 'pledged' to a particular candidate create the optics, but now with the ongoing primary process the voters in each state are showing SDs the error in that calculation... so there is that

22 remaining primaries, 56% or better through each for Bernie to beat HRC

tick tock... momentum and surge is happening, one candidate is rising in that regard whereas another is sweating out each of these remaining primaries with either plateaued or failing support... take a guess as to which candidate fits those two scenarios

rainbows indeed...

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
24. Notes...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:42 PM
Apr 2016

I'm comparing them now, why wait... we have data and facts now, each primary provides us with quite a bit to talk about

I get that HRC and her supporters are adverse to that but what the heck... these 22 remaining primaries allow the 'boxing match' to be called with each round eh?

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
25. You want to go full on quantitative?
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:00 PM
Apr 2016

I will start a new thread this evening after WI is in and post the link here.

You won't like what you see.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
32. 'Full quantitative'...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:28 PM
Apr 2016

sure whatevs...

trends and patterns... not too difficult, I understand what I see so my liking it or not doesn't matter as it pertains to the facts and data now does it?

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
33. Look, you were complaining that HRC supporters don't like looking at the numbers...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:31 PM
Apr 2016

... so offered looking at the numbers. If honestly don't care, I'll save myself the work of posting them.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
35. I don't complain about facts and data...
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:48 PM
Apr 2016

SDs 'pledged' before they have actually voted, that creates optics as if someone is already 'ahead' of another even before the first primary ballot was cast...

This is a fact

Each primary is a microcosm of the larger context and with each primary those data points matter as it relates to trending, so feel free to 'offer up' whatever you have

I know that you DO care otherwise you wouldn't be here posting trying to spin this

If you have something to offer in terms of facts and data then get to it, otherwise all you have is spin

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
36. Look, the point is the pledged delegate winner will be the nominee.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:52 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie's path to victory, the only path, is to secure a majority of the pledged delegates. At which point, enough supers will go to him to secure the nomination.

That is why the super delegates, at this point, are irrelevant.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
21. As if we don't know better
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

That might work on some members of the general public, but that crap isn't going to fly here. Pretty insulting honestly.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
4. Supers can switch if they feel the need or the Bern.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:57 PM
Apr 2016

Stranger things have happened. Like when they did it for Obama.

Schema Thing

(10,283 posts)
22. Well, they better if they don't want to ruin the party
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:28 PM
Apr 2016


y'know, young voters and all that. A vote for Hillary is a vote for status quo, and the status quo is Oligarchy. Not cool.


I suppose a "conservative" party could rise from the ashes of the GOP, but even better would be a Progressive party filling the vacuum left by the GOP implosion.
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
7. Somewhere there must be a wall with the sad, pathetic little remains of this kind of thing
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:00 PM
Apr 2016

lying in greasy clumps at its bottom. Oscar Madison himself would have given up quite a while ago.

Response to Alfresco (Original post)

Nanjeanne

(5,007 posts)
17. It's just weird that Clinton supporters feel the need to use Superdelegates to inflate the lead.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

She's ahead in pledged delegates. The SD will get their say after the voters have spoken. If she's the bestest candidate ever - and the one the voters want -- then her pledged delegate count should be sufficient for gloating.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
28. Kind of like Trump feeling the need to talk about how big his hands are . . . . . . .similar thing
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:03 PM
Apr 2016
 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
19. At the beginning of the primary season, after the initial states voted/caucused
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:12 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders cheerleaders stated that if Secretary Clinton were to steal the election via Superdelegates that it would "tear the Democratic Party apart".

Now that it's pretty clear that stealing the election is the only path to victory for Sanders ... where are those cheerleaders now?

 

lastone

(588 posts)
29. "stealing the election"
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:04 PM
Apr 2016

Just what the fuck are you talking about - "stealing the election" explain yourself, the Sanders camp is doing no such thing and if anything the HRC and DNC camps have done everything in their formatiable power to shut down the Sanders Campaign, so explain your self or shut the fuck up with this bullshit.

 

lastone

(588 posts)
34. LOL you sure did and it made NO SENSE!
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:39 PM
Apr 2016

"stealing the election" - really, from who the rigged for Hillary DNC, hopefully he can overcome ALL the bullshit that he's had to endure and steal it away from the corp interests currently ruining democracy.

ps, your reply was pathetically weak, nt though...

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
30. I'm sick of them MSM and Hillary supporters (I saw their other post in their group)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:05 PM
Apr 2016

using the SD's.

Also ran by Faux News and some woman was saying Bernie needs to get in the 60's and he hasn't done that except for Vermont and NH. Such BS. such lies and such trying to get low information voters to vote the lies...but those voters ...they are getting informed and Feelin the Bern.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Current Delegate Totals: ...