2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCurrent Delegate Totals: Clinton - 1739 / Sanders - 1070 / Need to nominate: 2,383.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D-PU.phtmldana_b
(11,546 posts)come on... you know better.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)The Sanders camp doesn't like that (today), but that's reality.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)Oh wait...
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)You guys keep looking for rainbows where there aren't any.
I guess it's better than being depressed.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)SD 'pledged' to a particular candidate create the optics, but now with the ongoing primary process the voters in each state are showing SDs the error in that calculation... so there is that
22 remaining primaries, 56% or better through each for Bernie to beat HRC
tick tock... momentum and surge is happening, one candidate is rising in that regard whereas another is sweating out each of these remaining primaries with either plateaued or failing support... take a guess as to which candidate fits those two scenarios
rainbows indeed...
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)We will compare notes in June.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)I'm comparing them now, why wait... we have data and facts now, each primary provides us with quite a bit to talk about
I get that HRC and her supporters are adverse to that but what the heck... these 22 remaining primaries allow the 'boxing match' to be called with each round eh?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I will start a new thread this evening after WI is in and post the link here.
You won't like what you see.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)sure whatevs...
trends and patterns... not too difficult, I understand what I see so my liking it or not doesn't matter as it pertains to the facts and data now does it?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... so offered looking at the numbers. If honestly don't care, I'll save myself the work of posting them.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)SDs 'pledged' before they have actually voted, that creates optics as if someone is already 'ahead' of another even before the first primary ballot was cast...
This is a fact
Each primary is a microcosm of the larger context and with each primary those data points matter as it relates to trending, so feel free to 'offer up' whatever you have
I know that you DO care otherwise you wouldn't be here posting trying to spin this
If you have something to offer in terms of facts and data then get to it, otherwise all you have is spin
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Bernie's path to victory, the only path, is to secure a majority of the pledged delegates. At which point, enough supers will go to him to secure the nomination.
That is why the super delegates, at this point, are irrelevant.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)casperthegm
(643 posts)That might work on some members of the general public, but that crap isn't going to fly here. Pretty insulting honestly.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Superdelegates do not vote until July 25th.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Stranger things have happened. Like when they did it for Obama.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)y'know, young voters and all that. A vote for Hillary is a vote for status quo, and the status quo is Oligarchy. Not cool.
I suppose a "conservative" party could rise from the ashes of the GOP, but even better would be a Progressive party filling the vacuum left by the GOP implosion.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Buh-bye...
djean111
(14,255 posts)lying in greasy clumps at its bottom. Oscar Madison himself would have given up quite a while ago.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)seems to be contagious...
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Response to Alfresco (Original post)
JackRiddler This message was self-deleted by its author.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,007 posts)She's ahead in pledged delegates. The SD will get their say after the voters have spoken. If she's the bestest candidate ever - and the one the voters want -- then her pledged delegate count should be sufficient for gloating.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I think it is sufficient.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Sanders cheerleaders stated that if Secretary Clinton were to steal the election via Superdelegates that it would "tear the Democratic Party apart".
Now that it's pretty clear that stealing the election is the only path to victory for Sanders ... where are those cheerleaders now?
lastone
(588 posts)Just what the fuck are you talking about - "stealing the election" explain yourself, the Sanders camp is doing no such thing and if anything the HRC and DNC camps have done everything in their formatiable power to shut down the Sanders Campaign, so explain your self or shut the fuck up with this bullshit.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)If you can't understand what I wrote ... I can't help you.
lastone
(588 posts)"stealing the election" - really, from who the rigged for Hillary DNC, hopefully he can overcome ALL the bullshit that he's had to endure and steal it away from the corp interests currently ruining democracy.
ps, your reply was pathetically weak, nt though...
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)using the SD's.
Also ran by Faux News and some woman was saying Bernie needs to get in the 60's and he hasn't done that except for Vermont and NH. Such BS. such lies and such trying to get low information voters to vote the lies...but those voters ...they are getting informed and Feelin the Bern.