2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVincardog
(20,234 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)A business transaction, paid for should be just that.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Just paid a 6 BILLION dollar fine, it is very relevant to see what she said since she is saying she will regulate Wall Street and says she has always been against Wall Street.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)financed by the tax payer for probably wrong doing, then of course she will release. This is a business transaction, and her earnings from these speeches, are all transparent in the many hundreds of pages of tax returns she has disclosed in full detail.
Until then, you are touting the most despicable of un-American, likely unconstitutional standards of guilty until proven innocent. That's pretty despicable.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Hillary said she has always been strong against Wall Street thus making it an issue for the election. She gave speeches, paid for or not, to a large investment firm that paid a large fine -- an indication of guilt -- so, it is the right of the Democratic voters to see just how tough she was on Goldman Sachs.
It is simple, she says she is tough on investment firms so let's see just how tough.
RampageSnipa586
(25 posts)You want to see how tough??
It was pretty glowing about us, one person who watched the event said. Its so far from what she sounds like as a candidate now. It was like a rah-rah speech. She sounded more like a Goldman Sachs managing director.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
Why do you think she won't release transcripts? It would be over by then.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)RealAmericanDem
(221 posts)berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)releases his tax return Hillary will release her transcripts... fail !