Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
slightly disappointed at Washington Post Poll- 2 pt swing for Romney 49-48 (Original Post) kansasobama Nov 2012 OP
the sample in the poll is Dem +3. I think that is down a bit from the past few days. jezebel Nov 2012 #1
Noise. Obama was actually ahead 48.56 to 48.47 nt geek tragedy Nov 2012 #2
Geek... NewsCenter28 Nov 2012 #10
Staten Island? Maybe they got 1-2 poll respondents from geek tragedy Nov 2012 #14
you should stop Lightsource777 Nov 2012 #23
are you joking? that's a RW talking point that was no doubt just faxed. progressivebydesign Nov 2012 #25
And Again... S_E_Fudd Nov 2012 #3
I am going to throw out MSM after the election kansasobama Nov 2012 #4
I was feeling great.... NewsCenter28 Nov 2012 #5
I hope you are being sarcastic. LisaL Nov 2012 #8
Either you are joking or need to get a serious grip. Just chill the heck out will you. RBInMaine Nov 2012 #9
RB.... NewsCenter28 Nov 2012 #16
Again, national polls are useless. LisaL Nov 2012 #18
It's a national poll -- only the battleground state polls matter. Arugula Latte Nov 2012 #13
Right I know all about 538/Princeton and the regression models NewsCenter28 Nov 2012 #20
I mean this with much true concern. Do you have a counselor or friend to talk to? progressivebydesign Nov 2012 #26
wow Lightsource777 Nov 2012 #24
Obama is ahead 49/48 - I'm good with that. mzmolly Nov 2012 #6
Absolutely! fugop Nov 2012 #11
Bizarre - the article reports Obama ahead, but the graph shows the opposite? mzmolly Nov 2012 #7
That's yesterday's #'s. nt geek tragedy Nov 2012 #15
Dratz! mzmolly Nov 2012 #22
That link and stroy is yesterday (Nov 1) ksoze Nov 2012 #17
Ahh. Guess that makes a difference. mzmolly Nov 2012 #21
Hey Newscenter28 it will be OK 2roos Nov 2012 #12
Fuck 'em Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #19
This tracking poll is basically showing normal statistical noise. Jennicut Nov 2012 #27

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
10. Geek...
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:34 PM
Nov 2012

You pretty sure that this isn't movement towards Romney because of Staten Island then? That's the only factor I can think of that would push Romney ahead overnight. On the other hand, President Obama's approval remained at 50%; so, if it does have to do with Staten Island, you would think his approval would have gone down as well which it did not.

Sorry, I'm a total mess. lol.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. Staten Island? Maybe they got 1-2 poll respondents from
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:35 PM
Nov 2012

from there--otherwise it's being hyped by the Wingnutosphere exclusively.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
25. are you joking? that's a RW talking point that was no doubt just faxed.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 07:57 PM
Nov 2012

that's ridiculous... sorry that dog don't hunt here.

S_E_Fudd

(1,295 posts)
3. And Again...
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:19 PM
Nov 2012

They do not publish their registered voter number. They screen out about 6% of voters who say they will probably vote, but are not certain to vote...

kansasobama

(609 posts)
4. I am going to throw out MSM after the election
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:22 PM
Nov 2012

ABC is probably now trying to curry favor. Why they do have D -3?

I really want to see MSM all look downcast (except the Chris Matthews group)

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
5. I was feeling great....
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:29 PM
Nov 2012

But this poll has devastated me and almost made me suicidal. Maybe that's the point? I don't know....I wish I didn't have poll OCD manic-depression. Their headline doesn't help either: "Can Obama win?."

I swear if President Obama loses on Tuesday night, I have no clue what I'm going to do. My life will be over.

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
16. RB....
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:37 PM
Nov 2012

No, I can't tell you how much I need to see President Obama re-elected for a whole host of reasons. I won't chill out.

Hopefully, PPP has a good national tracker tonight at 11 or so and then I can relax.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
13. It's a national poll -- only the battleground state polls matter.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:35 PM
Nov 2012

Romney will get a load of votes from Utah, Wyoming, Mississippi, places like that. Who cares.

But you get that, right?

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
20. Right I know all about 538/Princeton and the regression models
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:41 PM
Nov 2012

They're awesome. I'm just worried that bad national poll results might presage bad battleground poll results. No reason to think that they will but again, I will be beyond devastated if President Obama loses. I can't bear the possibility and I've never been one for positive thinking lol.

That said, the state polls looked AWESOME today. I thought we had it won until this poll came out.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
26. I mean this with much true concern. Do you have a counselor or friend to talk to?
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 08:01 PM
Nov 2012

Hard to tell on this board if you're really that serious or being melodramatic. Commit suicide if he doesn't win? If that is how you feel, please call someone right away. We're concerned about you.

It's a National poll, btw, and means nothing. the State polls are the ones that matter anyway. So many things can affect a poll, like what day they call, did they use cell phones, did they use a 'likely voter" model that arbitrarily removes the people who actually ARE voting this year? Etc. Some polls poll too heavily in the South, where Mittsters has a double digit lead in some States. It's just one poll.

And god forbid Romney wins, which I doubt highly, it's not the end of the world. We survived that asshole Bush, we can survive Romeny... but we won't have to.

But seriously... I mean it. If you're really having some problems PLEASE call someone right away. okay?

Lightsource777

(78 posts)
24. wow
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 07:19 PM
Nov 2012

Is there a hobby that can entertain you for the next 4 days other than reading polls? I think it would be healthier for you.

fugop

(1,828 posts)
11. Absolutely!
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:34 PM
Nov 2012

Considering all the factors and polls, this is great. Has Mitt led in ANY poll today?

mzmolly

(51,018 posts)
7. Bizarre - the article reports Obama ahead, but the graph shows the opposite?
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:33 PM
Nov 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/01/wapo-abc-tracking-poll-presidential-contest-as-close-as-close-can-be/

In the latest release, 49 percent of likely voters across the country back Obama, 48 percent his Republican challenger. It’s an identical 49 to 48 percent looking across eight states identified as “tossups” by The Washington Post.


RCP is picking up the graph numbers.

2roos

(26 posts)
12. Hey Newscenter28 it will be OK
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:35 PM
Nov 2012

go to election.princeton.edu - a better method than Nate Silver and a stronger Obama winning prediction - you'll feel better.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
27. This tracking poll is basically showing normal statistical noise.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 08:26 PM
Nov 2012

Look at the last few days. Always 49 /49 or 48 /49 or 49/ 48. Not worried much about it. Most national polls are pretty stable and bouncing around the margins of error. Tied or 1 point leads really just mean you need to look at the state polling and rely on GOTV.
Not even sure Rasmussen tied means much other then Scott Rasmussen is not cooking the books to get Romney ahead.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»slightly disappointed at ...