Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pirate Smile

(27,617 posts)
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:20 AM Apr 2012

Romney point of View = Opposite of RFK

Tucked in a generally positive article on Romney about his time at Harvard (although noting the ridiculous hypocracy of him attacking Pres. Obama for his (smaller) time at Harvard) is this blurb that really captures the essence of Romney:

At a time when many questioned authority, Romney embraced it. To Harvard Law Professor Detlev Vagts, who headed the joint program from 1969 to 2005, that trait prevented Romney from ranking as a truly exceptional student, such as the late investment banker Bruce Wasserstein, who graduated in 1971. Romney, Vagts says, lacked “a certain sense that the way things are are not the way they have to be -- that you could do things differently.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-29/romney-thrived-at-harvard-as-he-mocks-obama-tie-to-school.html


He doesn't get that the rest of the Country didn't/doesn't receive the same opportunities he got. He thinks it's just jealousy & envy.

Romney: Any Concern For Income Inequality Is ‘About Envy’

-snip-
Romney blasted his “desperate” opponents yesterday for joining President Obama in “put[ting] free enterprise on trial” and engaging in “the bitter politics of envy.”

This morning on the Today Show, host Matt Lauer asked Romney — twice — whether he truly believed any questions regarding the practices of Wall Street or the distribution of wealth and power is merely “envious” or more about “fairness.” Both times, Romney insisted that it was solely an “envy-oriented” attack on “millionaires and billionaires and executives and Wall Street”:

LAUER: When you said that we already have a leader who divides us with the bitter politics of envy, I’m curious about the word ‘envy.’ Did you suggest that anyone who questions the policies and practices of Wall Street and financial institutions, anyone who has questions about the distribution of wealth and power in this country, is envious? Is it about jealousy, or fairness?

ROMNEY: You know, I think it’s about envy. I think it’s about class warfare. When you have a president encouraging the idea of dividing America based on the 99 percent versus one percent — and those people who have been most successful will be in the one percent — you have opened up a whole new wave of approach in this country which is entirely inconsistent with the concept of one nation under God. The American people, I believe in the final analysis, will reject it.

LAUER: Yeah but envy? Are there no fair questions about the distribution of wealth without it being seen as ‘envy,’ though?

ROMNEY: I think it’s fine to talk about those things in quiet rooms and discussions about tax policy and the like. But the president has made it part of his campaign rally. Everywhere he goes we hear him talking about millionaires and billionaires and executives and Wall Street. It’s a very envy-oriented, attack-oriented approach and I think it will fail.


The exchange is indeed shocking in what it reveals. In a time when income inequality is at its worst level since the Great Depression and Americans are increasingly concerned over the shrinking middle class, Romney is insisting that anyone who questions — let alone tries to reform — the unfair advantages of the extremely wealthy or the destructive practices of the financial industry that single-handedly shoved America into a recession is nothing more than “envious” of these people’s success.

Perhaps his answer shouldn’t be so surprising given how myopic the view is from his high perch. Romney is, after all, a millionaire who is still making money from the predatory equity firm while paying little in taxes and owes much of his political viability to Wall Street’s pocketbook. Indeed, he suggested the public office should be the province of rich people. Perhaps he’s just defending his own.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/01/11/402671/romney-any-concern-for-income-inequality-is-about-envy/?mobile=nc


Romney on Inequality = Don't change a thing. In fact, let's make it worse.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney point of View = Opposite of RFK (Original Post) Pirate Smile Apr 2012 OP
Louis XVI never understood it either. Couldn't grasp the concept. dimbear Apr 2012 #1
Old Louie Saved A Fortune on Hats and Wigs n/t Yavin4 Apr 2012 #4
"...it's fine to talk about those things in quiet rooms..." CBHagman Apr 2012 #2
Kick Pirate Smile Apr 2012 #3

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
1. Louis XVI never understood it either. Couldn't grasp the concept.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:39 AM
Apr 2012

Don't remember how that one worked out.

CBHagman

(16,994 posts)
2. "...it's fine to talk about those things in quiet rooms..."
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 10:21 AM
Apr 2012

Holy Toledo, Romney really must sense the explosive nature of the topic -- i.e., that the top 1 percent enjoy unprecedented advantages while the rest of the populace finds that even with hard work, it can be difficult to get by, let alone make headway.

The transcript suggest that Romney talks strictly in GOP boilerplate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney point of View = Op...