2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCNN/ORC released this morning: Sanders gaining ground on Clinton
<snip>
Clintons lead dropped 9 points since last month, according to a CNN/ORC survey released Wednesday.
CNN found she now leads Sanders, 47 percent to 29 percent, among Democratic and Democratic-leaning Independent voters.
Clinton remains the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, it added, despite Sanders picking up 10 points since July.
Sanderss favorability spiked in the new poll, with 38 percent of Democrats saying they are "extremely enthusiastic" about voting give him, compared to 50 percent for Clinton.
<snip>
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/251427-sanders-gaining-ground-on-clinton
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Clinton rather than Sanders, boosting her numbers. With Biden's backers re-allocated to their second choice, Clinton holds 56%, Sanders 33%. "
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/19/politics/2016-poll-hillary-clinton-joe-biden-bernie-sanders/index.html
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Presidenting While Obama for 8 years.
Continuing to an historic third consequetive third term hold by the Democratic Party, or any Party of The Executive Branch, for potentially 16 straight years, is a huge part of the equation for historic liberal change in America- and is not to be trifled with because it has been hard earned and well deserved.
Clinton is a continuation of the evolution of liberalism in America, and isn't it social liberalism the Democratic Party represents, not classic socialism? The Canadian NDP is the best example I can give as comparison, and they just won Alberta in a shocker upset over 50 straight years of conservatism.
You say you want a revolution? But you already have it! You are standing in the middle of the time line as it is happening, an evolutionary and time time consuming one, granted, but is that not clear enough?
So what choice do the neo-fascists mirrored by the like of Trump and Fascist Company and their billionaire founders do, as they are witness to this puzzling leftist populist rise in the polling, but go deep in the playbook for Plan D, for "desperation", and give it one last old Liberty College Hail Maria Law desperate deep field toss of the xenophobia- overinflated ball!
"Trump, go deep and make yourself look big....it is our only hope!"
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)The good news is the momentum is in favor of Sanders, the bad news is that Clinton has a huge lead and is well organized.
cali
(114,904 posts)what jumps out at me are the continuing signs that she is not a strong general election candidate. The same poll has her ahead of trump by only 6 points and further erosion of her lead over other repubs. Also erosion of her favorabilities
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Hillary vs. Jeb: 53%-41% all, (52%-43% RV)
Hillary vs. The Donald: 52%-43% all, (51%-45% RV)
Hillary vs. Walker: 52%-44% all, (52%-46% RV)
Hillary vs. Fiorina: 55%-40% all, (53%-43% RV)
cali
(114,904 posts)And beating trump by all of six points?
John Poet
(2,510 posts)as opposed to what the Hillary DU-echo machine was telling us.
Bernie was only 1 point higher in that one.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)any Dem makes me very sad.
There's a lot of indolent Americans out there that are fucking mashugana.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)She has the extreme left, the right wing smear machine and the corporate media all attacking her.
It's the same thing they did to Gore. And the result is likely to be the same as well. Then the right wing and the media will congratulate themselves and the extreme left will proceed to disavow any responsibility as the USSC gets further stacked with cons.
It's déjà vu all over again.
starroute
(12,977 posts)Would those be the people who used to be described as "left of center" before the national discourse got shoved to far to the right?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Independents like Nader and Bernie.
cali
(114,904 posts)a lousy campaigner and perhaps she just isn't likeable enough.
Not when folks like those here have jumped on the right wing smear machine bandwagon. You're trying to take her down, so why disavow what you deliberately did if it ends up working? That makes no sense.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Thanks for posting!
ETA screenshot:
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Kos and Nate said so!!
FloridaBlues
(4,013 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)And no doubt you'll continue to doubt and simply name a new number he "can't get over".
ram2008
(1,238 posts)You're saying there won't be any movement from now on?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It's pretty clear looking at all the candidates that Clinton has lost some support and it went to Sanders.
The reignition of Clinton's email problems may be costing her polling support, and Sanders is looking like the next most likely challenger.
Nobody else appears to have collected any of the lost 9 points other than Sanders.
That dynamic could mess with projections that misjudged how significant the soft part of Clinton's support was.
Clinton's breaking under the 50% psychological barrier, where it's no longer possible to say 'most' democrats polled prefer her. Now she's only leading polling among democrats. While it's still a sizable lead it's changed character.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)from the same polling organization.
That will yield incorrect conclusions.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)So you might as well be asking the first 50 people you see in a mall.
CNN loves polls that drive headlines, not facts.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)all of the polls cited by Hillary supporters have been RV
read em', and of course... weep
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html#polls
What this shows is that Fox was no outlier.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)For example, 538's aggregate downplays likely voter polls until closer to the election.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)this backs up the fox poll which had hillary's lead down to 19 points.Here it is 18 points.
Bernie is going up and she is going down.and remember this is national poll.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)MoveIt
(399 posts)You know, since he's not running and stuff....
Has there been any recent polling that shows how they break down support for their "2nd" choice of re: Hillary/Sanders/O'Malley ?
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Her share goes up to 56% while Sanders increased by 3%.
MoveIt
(399 posts)Thanks I skimmed through and missed it the first time.
That's about what I expected, and matches the overall breakdown of dems nationally. Onward and upward
K lib
(153 posts)Edit: I see the information now
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)From the Article:
It found that should he decide not to run, most of his supports would back Clinton over Sanders in the next election cycle. Clinton earns 56 percent of Bidens potential supports should he pass on a White House run, CNN/ORC said.
Sanders, it added, nabs 33 percent in that scenario, while support for the other Democratic Oval Office bids remains unchanged.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Off by a percent.
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)Sanders, it added, nabs 33 percent in that scenario
33 % is not 3% or 4%, but I think you knew that.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Which would be what I mentioned in my other post.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Any candidate, anywhere, anytime, would kill for the numbers Mrs. Clinton has.
She is very, very close to a lock in both the primary and general election from what I'm seeing.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)But her numbers have just kept falling, while Bernie's just keep rising. The real question is what will each of their numbers be by the time voting rolls around.
cali
(114,904 posts)If you can't see what a big jump that is, you're the one whose vision is skewed
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)who would NEVER vote for Hillary ... and who aren't counted
in these polls of "likely Democratic voters"
K lib
(153 posts)It does include independents that lean democrat, but I agree it probably does not have the full extent of the effect.
azmom
(5,208 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)And there still hasn't even been a single debate. At this point, Bernie has definitely exceeded expectations. There are still plenty of reasons to think Hillary is a big favorite, but at some point, if the gap closes any more (or maybe even now), she's going to have to make some tactical changes in her campaign strategy, which so far has been to lay low and do fundraisers.
But if she decides to go after Bernie in the primary, that in turn could hurt her in the GE with the base. And if she tries to pivot further left, that could hurt her with moderates in the GE. She's in a tricky spot.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Getting from 30% to 50% means having a well built coalition.
He can get there if he can effectively appeal to lots of groups.
Both he and Hillary need to make a move IMO.
Playinghardball
(11,665 posts)totodeinhere
(13,059 posts)according to that poll. That's really scary.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)If Biden bows out, as expected, that will likely help HRC, but Bernie may be stronger than I expected.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I'm sure that's why they included a guy not running in the poll. The corporate media hates her because she won't kiss their asses.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)There was a recent post on DU saying Sanders had peaked and begun to 'wane'.
I don't see it now, but am guessing it was in a pro-HC post.
I expect Bernie to keep on truckin' while Hillary gets bogged down in mud. JMHO
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Onwards to the peak!
Uncle Joe
(58,506 posts)Thanks for the thread, cali.