Judge Luttig DISMANTLES Supreme Court Trump APPEASEMENT - Meidas Touch

[Rhiannon12866]

Former Federal appellate Judge Luttig joins Legal AF’s Michael Popok for a no holds barred discussion as to why the majority of the Supreme Court discussed at oral argument on Trump’s criminal immunity EVERYTHING BUT the issue on appeal and appear likely to grant him and future presidents some sort of criminal immunity. - 05/01/2024.

[riversedge]

1. likely to grant some "criminal immunity" This is scary VERY scary stuff. This means ONE person will be Above the LAW!!

[Rhiannon12866]

2. Exactly, and that one person is charged with numerous crimes, including jeopardizing national security

And attempting to overthrow the government!

[Dustlawyer]

4. Think about the other can of worms this would open if you follow it to its logical conclusion.

The President orders his opposition imprisoned immediately and without trial. The officers who violate those individuals civil rights can be prosecuted. The jailers who are illegally holding them prosecuted as well. Soldiers and police officers are to obey all lawful orders but not unlawful ones.

Where do you draw the line if you give the President immunity? This whole thing is ridiculous!

[kelly1mm]

3. I fail to understand what the opinions of someone not able to influence a decision

of the USSC matters? How many votes does Judge Luttig have on the Supreme Court again?

[Wild blueberry]

5. Appreciate thoughtful discussion by people who are familiar with our laws and Constitution

Thank you.