General Discussion

Nixie

(17,082 posts)

25. Yet the wins keep piling up with the actual electorate, so

Reply to Post removed (Reply #21)

Fri Nov 19, 2021, 12:10 PM

Nov 2021

Last edited Fri Nov 19, 2021, 01:33 PM - Edit history (1)

who is it that is really whining?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie coming up on Chris Hayes [View all] malaise Nov 2021 OP

Watching bdamomma Nov 2021 #1

Will Chris ask him about funding for the F-35? N/T lapucelle Nov 2021 #2

His time would be better spent asking FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #3

Why isn't Chris Haye's time well spent asking about $1,500,000,000,000 lapucelle Nov 2021 #4

Maybe the corporate media should be exposing a lot more FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #7

Lots of people are "sick of smears". So sick of it. Nixie Nov 2021 #9

The problem of TV show hosts who pander to sponsors is best taken up with the hosts themselves. lapucelle Nov 2021 #12

Didn't someone say giant fonts and charts don't prove anything? FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #15

That's how legislating works. Representatives and Senators vote on legislation and they either.... George II Nov 2021 #17

Not denying that technical truth FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #18

The chart shows the percentage rate of a legislator having voted for the Biden agenda. lapucelle Nov 2021 #39

Come Now Me. Nov 2021 #55

So the money doesn't matter if it's "old news"? Nixie Nov 2021 #6

He scored quite a massive deal with the F-35 Budi Nov 2021 #5

the F-35 programme teams with nearly 1,800 domestic suppliers in 45 states plus Puerto Rico Celerity Nov 2021 #8

Hayes's guest was the junior senator from VT, and the topic was a defense budget bloated lapucelle Nov 2021 #10

+1 betsuni Nov 2021 #11

You still are, and likely always will be, guilty of cherry picking out not only just one state, but Celerity Nov 2021 #13

Erm, the junior senator from the state I "cherrypicked" was Hayes's guest last night, lapucelle Nov 2021 #14

AMEN!!!!! FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #16

Changing the subject to DUers and other politicians Nixie Nov 2021 #19

Interesting that he's the only one who upsets some people. FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #20

It's also interesting how "some people" get upset when Nixie Nov 2021 #22

maybe that's not the reason FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #24

Wow, if only the "real reasons" about Bernie could be spoken. Nixie Nov 2021 #26

Ya know what really GOD DAMN pisses me off? When someone implies Hillary Eliot Rosewater Nov 2021 #49

+1 betsuni Nov 2021 #51

Great post and I feel the same way, Eliot. To diminish Nixie Nov 2021 #52

Thanks...to think this is ALL AVOIDABLE and yet the people who CONTRIBUTED to our Eliot Rosewater Nov 2021 #53

Exactly, and now the attempts to revise history. Nixie Nov 2021 #54

Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #21

It really says something about them, doesn't it. FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #23

"Them"? Just who are "them" that you folks keep referring to. When I'm talking about DUers here.... George II Nov 2021 #36

Interesting, because "we progressives" often feel FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #37

I go out of my way to not divide Democrats into "we" and "them". George II Nov 2021 #42

I wish more would. FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #43

Yet the wins keep piling up with the actual electorate, so Nixie Nov 2021 #25

"...fading away relegated to sending tweets from a den in Chappaqua." Just WHO are you referring to? George II Nov 2021 #29

Seems pretty straightforward and accurate to me. Good job! marble falls Nov 2021 #30

A few simple numbers about the F-35 George II Nov 2021 #27

Perhaps you should ask the Pentagon why that is. FoxNewsSucks Nov 2021 #28

As we all know, distribution of military equipment and personnel is subject... George II Nov 2021 #32

Great post, and as we can see from the responses, military spending Nixie Nov 2021 #34

you would never geographically equally divide deployment so that each state had the same number Celerity Nov 2021 #31

You would think an someone on the upper end of the boomer generation would know ... Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2021 #33

Hah, nice insult there. .... George II Nov 2021 #38

The F-35 has already been designed and the 285 that are deployed around the country have already.... George II Nov 2021 #35

Have you done the math on why North Dakota got such a high rate of nuclear warheads? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2021 #40

I'm discussing where the F-35 aircraft are deployed. Where nuclear warheads are is irrelevant. George II Nov 2021 #41

So military strategy applies to warheads but not aircraft? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2021 #44

Fighter jets and nuclear warheads are two entirely different weapons/equipment.... George II Nov 2021 #45

Of course. Are you arguing that there is no strategic reason to have them in Vermont? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2021 #46

For a supersonic fighter jet, I see no strategic reason. Do you? George II Nov 2021 #47

I am not a military air strategy expert? Are you? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2021 #48

No I'm not, which is why I didn't introduce it into the discussion. George II Nov 2021 #50

Well, you did introduce it when you said there was no real reason for the fighters to be in Vermont. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2021 #56