Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: "It's much worse." [View all]

calimary

(81,793 posts)
30. Man-oh-man have I wanted that for a long time!
Mon Apr 29, 2024, 02:45 PM
Apr 29

Should be 13 justices on the Supreme Court.

Our population has increased substantially. We have 13 Courts of Appeals across America, 12 plus the Federal Court of Appeals in Washington.

Courts of Appeals

There are 13 appellate courts that sit below the U.S. Supreme Court, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 94 federal judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a court of appeals. The appellate court’s task is to determine whether or not the law was applied correctly in the trial court. Appeals courts consist of three judges and do not use a jury.

A court of appeals hears challenges to district court decisions from courts located within its circuit, as well as appeals from decisions of federal administrative agencies.

In addition, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has nationwide jurisdiction to hear appeals in specialized cases, such as those involving patent laws, and cases decided by the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

Learn more about the courts of appeals.


https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/court-role-and-structure

Seems to me, anyway, that the Supreme Court should reflect that, by expanding to 13 justices, 12 associates and the Chief.

"It's much worse." [View all] babylonsister Apr 29 OP
Must Read malaise Apr 29 #1
SCOTUS should've never taken up the immunity decision as the circuit court... brush Apr 29 #2
Not only that, but they are delaying their ruling at least until the sitting president is no longer in office. Chainfire Apr 29 #3
The frustrating fact is that Republicans have removed impeachment as an option when it is one of their own. Lonestarblue Apr 29 #6
who here feels they can't do their job without breaking the law? unblock Apr 29 #4
There are no vexing questions about this at all. SCOTUS does not think there is a situation where the president must hadEnuf Apr 29 #9
Nailed it. unblock Apr 29 #11
Every damn newspaper and news program in our country should print what Mr. Snyder is saying. chowder66 Apr 29 #5
Well said Farmer-Rick Apr 29 #7
SCOTUS would make TSF above their triune God RainCaster Apr 29 #13
Not only did George III violate the law that even kings were/are subject to wnylib Apr 29 #8
To paraphrase one of my heroes.... lastlib Apr 29 #10
Trump wants immunity because he committed the crime. Turbineguy Apr 29 #12
Timothy Synder is always a "must read" for me young_at_heart Apr 29 #14
Thanks, I missed this post. Ugh. 58Sunliner Apr 29 #15
Careful what you ask for, SCOTUS liberalgunwilltravel Apr 29 #16
They don't care because they KNOW he will not do that. Justice matters. Apr 29 #21
The lawyers need to point out drmeow Apr 29 #25
I was thinking about this last night...wrestling with insomnia... Trueblue Texan Apr 30 #39
K&R - MUST READ onecaliberal Apr 29 #17
KnR Hekate Apr 29 #18
K&R MustLoveBeagles Apr 29 #19
K & R BoRaGard Apr 29 #20
where are the liberal leaning Justices? CANADIANBEAVER69 Apr 29 #22
They haven't been silent, babylonsister Apr 29 #28
I understand the dynamics of the politically leaning Justices CANADIANBEAVER69 Apr 29 #29
they're not! barbtries Apr 29 #35
I have listened to the arguments. I know they won't do nightly news but CANADIANBEAVER69 Apr 29 #36
IMPEACHMENT would no longer be a remedy, BECAUSE... Martin Eden Apr 29 #23
Would Alito, Thomas, et al want a Democratic president to wield such powers with immunity? RVN VET71 Apr 30 #42
Delay, delay, delay ... Martin Eden Apr 30 #44
Not to mention " full and unquestioned presidential immunity" RVN VET71 May 2 #45
This conservative Supreme Court had better remember that a dictator has no need of an independent court, elocs Apr 29 #24
I find this so depressing. BigDemVoter Apr 29 #26
Man-oh-man have I wanted that for a long time! calimary Apr 29 #30
13? I favor 15 RVN VET71 Apr 30 #43
If Joe gets immunity pwb Apr 29 #27
I've listed below, in great detail, all the things I've seen that Timothy Snyder has been wrong about: SupportSanity Apr 29 #31
Impeach them now. (no text) returnee Apr 29 #32
Well, if we have to go all Charles I on Diaper Don, we fucking well will. Aristus Apr 29 #33
Worst court in my lifetime. Clarence NEVER should have been there and there are several others as well. nt Evolve Dammit Apr 29 #34
Part of me can't even believe we are here and secondly, I'm beginning to hope that we are being pranked by flying_wahini Apr 29 #37
It is really hard to believe how far SCOTUS has strayed from the democratic norm. Martin68 Apr 29 #38
K&R spanone Apr 30 #40
Excuse the expression, but the 800lb gorilla in the room is, Ta-Da: wolfie001 Apr 30 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"It's much worse."»Reply #30