Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,852 posts)
6. They are facilitating the need for further rules and clarifications
Tue Apr 30, 2024, 12:36 AM
Apr 30

The Supreme Court normally decides cases as narrowly as possible. General rules come usually come in only when there are many cases being decided differently by lower courts.

With only one president ever indicted in a quarter millennial, there's hardly a pressing need for a "rule for the ages".

Normal in any event would be to allow the trial to proceed and deal with an appeal if and when that happens. *especially* given that the delay could well change the case from an ex-president defendant to a sitting president defendant, for which they may want different rules (e.g., prosecution deferred until the end of the new term) or, of course, the criminal defendant could ruin the prosecution in a number of different ways.

But it's not hard to understand. They're corrupt and trying to help Donnie, plain and simple.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What are typical sentence...»Reply #6