Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Looks like Judge Cannon in a bit of a pickle: [View all]MOMFUDSKI
(6,295 posts)13. Hoo Boy!
How far can we ride this pony?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hard Ass " Judge " ... TrueBlue 1968 says .... Throw the CANNON in the slammer for 8 years
Trueblue1968
May 4
#83
I believe there are laws in this area that apply to federal judges, but Supreme Court justices are exempt.
unblock
May 4
#16
Federal Judges outside of SCOTUS are regulated as to ethics, appearance of conflict, and other such faux pas. They can
Ford_Prefect
May 4
#26
If I'm not mistaken, the ChiefJudge has more authority over her than Roberts has over the rest of the scumbags
Hassin Bin Sober
May 4
#40
There's probably a multi-million dollar gift from her benefactors in her future.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
May 4
#77
Presumably their knowledge in matters of law would extend to requirements for their position.
yonder
May 4
#30
Maybe the media will go after her like they did Fani Willis. We demand receipts and info on sexual activities!
jalan48
May 4
#41
Maybe she should hire Kristi Noem to resolve the issue of the dog who ate the travel receipts.
Ping Tung
May 4
#45
Well, this explains everything! LOL Any tiny bit of faith in humanity is nearly gone! K and R nt
Quixote1818
May 4
#55
Does it bother you that NPR also identified reporting failures by appointees of Presidents Clinton and Obama?
onenote
May 4
#101
Perhaps you should focus on the event, amount paid, AND Who paid for it rather than lumping everyone
bobalew
May 5
#111
Technical difficulties? Like she thought she was already on the SCOTUS and didn't have to report such freebies?
Attilatheblond
May 4
#71
How about an investigation into how this might impair judgement; and isn't Clarence overdue? WTF America?
Evolve Dammit
May 4
#76
IF this gets resolved I bet it happens after the election. It might not matter then
mucifer
May 4
#79
Getting a little ahead of herself, isn't she? She is not on a SCOTUS bench seat yet.
Scalded Nun
May 4
#99
Does that apply to the several dozen other judges who failed to make a timely report?
onenote
May 4
#104