Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Farmer-Rick

(10,308 posts)
23. It always amazes me
Sat May 4, 2024, 01:24 PM
May 4

How nondescript evil looks like. They don't have horns or pitchforks. They have normal looking faces. Only when they interact with others do you recognize them for the monsters they are.

And ...they sell themselves for cheap.

You would have to give me a whole lot more than a luxury vacation or 2, or a luxury RV, if you wanted me to sell out my integrity, democracy and my country. These judges come cheap.

Is being a corrupt dumbass a technical issue? NewHendoLib May 4 #1
Her pen running out of ink is a technical issue. KS Toronado May 4 #25
She submits everything as a PlutosHeart May 4 #43
And of course, knows not to leave a paper trail peppertree May 5 #124
Only because she's technically corrupt...and a dumbass Docreed2003 May 4 #35
Hard Ass " Judge " ... TrueBlue 1968 says .... Throw the CANNON in the slammer for 8 years Trueblue1968 May 4 #83
Were she and Clarence COL Mustard May 4 #95
BS Rebl2 May 4 #2
Might be the impetus to get her removed from the case. Kingofalldems May 4 #3
Not likely, unless somehow it's related to the case or to any of the parties Ocelot II May 4 #14
did anyone who paid for her trips also donate to trump? ZonkerHarris May 4 #36
Really that should be enough senseandsensibility May 4 #58
The "technical issues", was that the puppet master strings got tangled. republianmushroom May 4 #4
Tangled strings, Arne May 4 #9
I believe there are laws in this area that apply to federal judges, but Supreme Court justices are exempt. unblock May 4 #16
Yes, that's what I was going to say PatSeg May 4 #48
Federal Judges outside of SCOTUS are regulated as to ethics, appearance of conflict, and other such faux pas. They can Ford_Prefect May 4 #26
If I'm not mistaken, the ChiefJudge has more authority over her than Roberts has over the rest of the scumbags Hassin Bin Sober May 4 #40
Is this leading to some billionaire paying her way? FarPoint May 4 #5
For a very junior judge. Hmmmm...... vanlassie May 4 #31
$700.00 a bottle champagne,... magicarpet May 4 #6
Is that what the billionaires are serving their RepubliPuppets? BoRaGard May 4 #42
Its funny these people think the price makes it taste better. nt oldsoftie May 5 #113
paid luxuray trips ? snork recurse the alpha hotel AllaN01Bear May 4 #7
Third world jurisprudence in the flesh peppertree May 4 #84
Another crooked repug judge being wined and dined by repug billionaires. brush May 4 #8
Oops! grumpyduck May 4 #10
Groomed for Greatne$$ Kid Berwyn May 4 #11
Is that Ken Burns in the middle? onetexan May 4 #78
Yes. Explains "Baseball" leaving out Hispanic players. Kid Berwyn May 4 #82
Omg, i honestly thought it was a lady tavernier May 5 #118
I am sure the MAGAts will soon declare her innocence ....... Kingofalldems May 4 #12
And they did. Kingofalldems May 4 #69
Hoo Boy! MOMFUDSKI May 4 #13
So ... WHAT IS SHE NOT DECLARING FROM BILLIONAIRES NOW??? bucolic_frolic May 4 #15
It'sasecret! czarjak May 4 #87
Same billionaire that keeps Thomas as a pet? Bernardo de La Paz May 4 #17
From NPR: mahatmakanejeeves May 4 #18
A rich man (Jay Gould) once said mountain grammy May 4 #19
All smoothed over if you just recuse! dchill May 4 #20
Can anyone point to the last time a federal judge had a consequence imposed RockRaven May 4 #21
Just saying, IF she's smart, she will bluestarone May 4 #22
Unless she's angling for the long game. calimary May 4 #51
There's probably a multi-million dollar gift from her benefactors in her future. LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 4 #77
It always amazes me Farmer-Rick May 4 #23
Henry Cuellar sold himself cheap at $600,000 Ponietz May 5 #120
Oops! Is this more fallout from the Clarence Thomas bribery scandal? Martin68 May 4 #24
Maybe not related directly, but looks like more of the same "ethics." Ocelot II May 4 #28
bias/buy ass🤡👍time to recuse fuckhead bringthePaine May 4 #27
Technical issues, like not knowing the law? WestMichRad May 4 #29
Presumably their knowledge in matters of law would extend to requirements for their position. yonder May 4 #30
Now, whose job is it to sanction them for this? Scrivener7 May 4 #32
Paging Jack Smith.... Paging Jack Smith.... Blue Owl May 4 #33
The damn corruption Traildogbob May 4 #34
"Any pretense of impartiality in my courtroom is completely inadvertent." BeyondGeography May 4 #37
Trump could call for her removal and get his delay that way? Freethinker65 May 4 #38
Republicans for sale BoRaGard May 4 #39
Maybe the media will go after her like they did Fani Willis. We demand receipts and info on sexual activities! jalan48 May 4 #41
Holding my breath. triron May 5 #119
Sure we all partied..... OnDoutside May 4 #44
Maybe she should hire Kristi Noem to resolve the issue of the dog who ate the travel receipts. Ping Tung May 4 #45
Are there enforceable ethics rules for courts below the Supremes? diane in sf May 4 #46
Rocky Mountain pickles Tetrachloride May 4 #47
Montana, ay? Can I send her one of my special hats for her next trip? Attilatheblond May 4 #49
Come on Aileen. Sneederbunk May 4 #50
And whoare the billionaires bankrollong her trips? onetexan May 4 #52
Good. Remove her from the case Joinfortmill May 4 #53
Being groomed for the Supreme Court... surfered May 4 #54
Absolutely. jalan48 May 4 #63
That's what I'm dreading. If her "idol" gets back in the White House, calimary May 4 #74
Actually, her being a 'candidate' should be one of the lesser problems...... MyOwnPeace May 4 #93
Well, this explains everything! LOL Any tiny bit of faith in humanity is nearly gone! K and R nt Quixote1818 May 4 #55
No judges should be allowed to have any gifts Tree Lady May 4 #56
Influenced to do what? TexasDem69 May 4 #60
Let people off or help them like Tree Lady May 4 #61
But there's nothing in the story suggesting she ruled in favor of anyone TexasDem69 May 4 #62
I know its not a law not to Tree Lady May 4 #65
That's fine as a general matter TexasDem69 May 4 #67
Must she look so Creepy! "Who else wants Cannon Impeached? Cha May 4 #57
I Wish Was Good At Photoshop ... I See A Unibrow WiVoter May 4 #89
Judge I. Lean Bannon Kid Berwyn May 5 #114
So I read the article TexasDem69 May 4 #59
If you don't see it, no reason to even respond. Kingofalldems May 4 #64
Care to enlighten me? TexasDem69 May 4 #66
Billionaires aligned with Trump trying to harness ALL power Kingofalldems May 4 #68
Those billionaires contributed to cheato senseandsensibility May 4 #72
"Billionaires" doesn't equal Trump TexasDem69 May 4 #73
One thing for sure bluestarone May 4 #75
I'm with you. triron May 5 #127
"I have seen zero evidence that the Supreme Court is compromised" TBF May 4 #86
This message was self-deleted by its author Ponietz May 5 #121
Does it bother you that NPR also identified reporting failures by appointees of Presidents Clinton and Obama? onenote May 4 #101
Perhaps you should focus on the event, amount paid, AND Who paid for it rather than lumping everyone bobalew May 5 #111
You want to focus on the event -- here you go. onenote May 5 #116
Working on her USSC bona fides, I see... Wounded Bear May 4 #70
Technical difficulties? Like she thought she was already on the SCOTUS and didn't have to report such freebies? Attilatheblond May 4 #71
How about an investigation into how this might impair judgement; and isn't Clarence overdue? WTF America? Evolve Dammit May 4 #76
IF this gets resolved I bet it happens after the election. It might not matter then mucifer May 4 #79
Another Clarence. live love laugh May 4 #80
The original NPR investigation... reACTIONary May 4 #81
Which apparently almost no-one posting in this thread has bothered to read. onenote May 4 #96
So shocking ... TBF May 4 #85
Ignorance of the law and all that rot Pas-de-Calais May 4 #88
That's bigger than an affair with a colleague liberal N proud May 4 #90
Yep. I'll bet if folks keep digging, they'll find more corruption duckworth969 May 4 #91
George Mason University & Koch Brothers duckworth969 May 4 #92
IOKIYAR RULES!!! whoooooo! pansypoo53219 May 4 #94
So, I guess this qualifies her to succeed... AdamGG May 4 #97
K&R. nt Wednesdays May 4 #98
Getting a little ahead of herself, isn't she? She is not on a SCOTUS bench seat yet. Scalded Nun May 4 #99
APPARENTLY ALMOST NO ONE COMMENTING IN THIS THREAD HAS READ THE NPR REPORT. onenote May 4 #100
Others have failed this, too, but she's taken on a higher profile calimary May 4 #102
Remove her from the bench, she is a law breaker. Bluethroughu May 4 #103
Does that apply to the several dozen other judges who failed to make a timely report? onenote May 4 #104
If they didn't disclose vacations and other goods? Bluethroughu May 4 #105
So you'd dump Stacey Abrams sister for something NPR's investigation concluded was not a big deal onenote May 4 #108
Who does she think she is, Clarence Thomas? spanone May 4 #106
Or Sam malaise May 5 #123
Bwahahahahahaaa... spanone May 5 #125
Might be a contest on ---who can get the most. Kingofalldems May 5 #126
This message was self-deleted by its author spanone May 4 #107
Recuse!! Be The Light May 5 #109
When do we meet up with pitchforks?!! 58Sunliner May 5 #110
She techinically tried to hide it. I get it. n/t aggiesal May 5 #112
She"d lock you up for less malaise May 5 #115
No question. Kingofalldems May 5 #122
could that be a fusillade of pickles?.........anybody? jaxexpat May 5 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looks like Judge Cannon i...»Reply #23