2016 Postmortem

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,727 posts)

66. I am cray cray...

Reply to frylock (Reply #62)

Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:56 PM

Apr 2016

Last edited Fri Apr 29, 2016, 07:23 AM - Edit history (2)

That indicment (sic) certainly isn't going to help yours.

I am cray cray and in that vein I am willing to bet my pinkie finger Hillary Clinton isn't indicted. Loser lobs it off. It's a pipe dream, a farce, a Republican wet dream. At the glacial pace this investigation is proceeding the FBI will release its final report some time after Hillary Clinton is inaugurated.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

121 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ Claims Revealing FBI Declaration Will Jeopardize Clinton Email Investigation [View all] think Apr 2016 OP

"Keep hope alive." DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #1

Drips FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #28

Make that your mantra. frylock Apr 2016 #46

SMH DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #50

That indicment certainly isn't going to help yours. frylock Apr 2016 #62

I am cray cray... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #66

Hey, but as long as she gets the title of First Woman President, it's all good, amirite? frylock Apr 2016 #119

Yeah, mostly from your side from what I'm hearing. nolawarlock Apr 2016 #120

Karl Rove, all the pricks on the Benghazi committee are laughing their asses of. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #52

There is nothing you wrote any rational person could disagree with. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #54

Why do you keep lying and claiming this has anything to do with Benghazi? Kentonio Apr 2016 #71

“is working on a referral Inspectors General in connection with former Secretary of State Clinton’s leveymg Apr 2016 #2

"...in connection with..." does not equate to Clinton being a target. randome Apr 2016 #5

You are a good wishful thinker and very loyal to Hillary. You will be rewarded leveymg Apr 2016 #11

I don't even like Clinton. Said so from way back. randome Apr 2016 #16

She's not even the nominee yet, and is unlikely to be. leveymg Apr 2016 #20

Unlikely to be the nominee? Have you been asleep for a few weeks? brush Apr 2016 #55

What do you think happens to her delegates if the FBI report finds she violated her security oath? leveymg Apr 2016 #58

Keep praying. The DOJ would have to go against too many powerful forces . . . brush Apr 2016 #65

An indictment is beside the point. The FBI Report is likely to find she violated her security oath. leveymg Apr 2016 #73

It won't happen. The FBI is part of the DOJ, headed by Lorretta Lynch, an Obama appointee. brush Apr 2016 #79

Are you reading what you write??? angrychair Apr 2016 #86

Don't you get it by now? The alleged email issue is another Benghazi-like repug pushed faux-scandal brush Apr 2016 #88

No, it's not angrychair Apr 2016 #91

"I don't care about your damn emails". brush Apr 2016 #93

This beltanefauve Apr 2016 #90

I think you're going to be very very disappointed. joshcryer Apr 2016 #32

Yup! That server will be indicted any moment now. nt NWCorona Apr 2016 #15

"We'd like to ask you a few questions." randome Apr 2016 #19

That was pretty funny NWCorona Apr 2016 #21

It specifically says in connection with *her* use. I might agree with you if it merely said JudyM Apr 2016 #31

Every word has a meaning in court filings, even if some would prefer to pick and choose. leveymg Apr 2016 #42

Every word in a public DOJ statement about an ongoing investigation/referral would certainly JudyM Apr 2016 #44

Now In Plain English - What Does All This Mean?.....nt global1 Apr 2016 #3

Don't know....but, maybe something to do with this? KoKo Apr 2016 #8

I like how lawnewz references their own founder as a corroborative source. randome Apr 2016 #9

was an independent investigator ever established for the State Dept? Didn't HRC oppose that? amborin Apr 2016 #34

State Department was Missing Top Oversite (IG) During Her Time as SOS KoKo Apr 2016 #82

that's what I thought; thanks! amborin Apr 2016 #85

You are Welcome! KoKo Apr 2016 #87

The DOJ is refusing to release a document via FOIA as it may interfere with the FBI case into think Apr 2016 #10

If "exculpatory" evidence came out that would also hurt their investigation. joshcryer Apr 2016 #33

Now who's engaging in conspiracy theories? Marr Apr 2016 #39

The cluelessness is astounding. joshcryer Apr 2016 #100

That is correct. It is significant for 2 reasons. JudyM Apr 2016 #35

Yes, the DOJ's use of the word "referral" stands out for me, as well. leveymg Apr 2016 #53

are you thinking there's a fix in... grasswire Apr 2016 #60

Yep. If the FBI determines a crime has been committed, that will be in the news. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #103

my question about this grasswire Apr 2016 #61

A "referral" is the case that the substantive responsibility unit (here, FBI) puts together for DOJ JudyM Apr 2016 #70

Are the Inspectors General part of the FBI? antigop Apr 2016 #76

No. Each agency has an IG. In this case, it was CIA and Intelligence Community IGs who first made leveymg Apr 2016 #77

but if you go back and read what it said about the referral, it indicates the referral is from antigop Apr 2016 #81

The referrals all originate with the agencies that issued the classified documents found by them leveymg Apr 2016 #98

ok, thanks. nt antigop Apr 2016 #99

So, you see, the AG has to make a decision based upon multiple agency referrals in this case. leveymg Apr 2016 #101

"she becomes unviable as a candidate" antigop Apr 2016 #104

She becomes unviable as a candidate if there is a finding she violated her security agreement. Game leveymg Apr 2016 #107

Makes you respect Bernie a bit more, no? Barack_America Apr 2016 #110

Yes. grasswire Apr 2016 #113

Yes, all the more. leveymg Apr 2016 #118

Good question, I am not certain about that. Generally all federal agencies have their own IG. JudyM Apr 2016 #78

Thank you for the reply. I missed it in a flurry of responses. I appreciate the clarification... think Apr 2016 #80

sounds like they're just tired of the gop foia fishing.... artyteacher Apr 2016 #4

+ 1 JoePhilly Apr 2016 #6

The Judge wouldn't have granted Discovery if this was a partisan fishing expedition. Sorry. leveymg Apr 2016 #12

The fact that they would be tired has no bearing on this matter. NWCorona Apr 2016 #17

The DoJ would not have offered immunity to Pagliano Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #40

The FOIA request came from a journalist. Not the GOP. nt vintx Apr 2016 #43

Tick tock BSers trumad Apr 2016 #7

In the words of one of the federal judges working this case, "Drip, drip." He said it first. leveymg Apr 2016 #13

What is the name of the Federal Judge who said drip drip trumad Apr 2016 #24

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan leveymg Apr 2016 #45

DRIPGHAZI!!! frylock Apr 2016 #48

Judge Sullivan's DC District Court bio. leveymg Apr 2016 #67

Keep whistling past that graveyard... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #14

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #18

I highly encourage you to keep posting this shit trumad Apr 2016 #26

Some people just can't stand the sight of Hillary in colored pantsuits. ;-) leveymg Apr 2016 #47

How the fuck was that post hidden? frylock Apr 2016 #51

Oh so Hillary in an Orange jumpsuit is ok here at DU trumad Apr 2016 #59

It was a pantsuit. frylock Apr 2016 #68

Err, you know those were her actual clothes right? Kentonio Apr 2016 #72

^^^ grasswire Apr 2016 #64

We can see your transparency page angrychair Apr 2016 #89

Here's the thing... trumad Apr 2016 #92

15 people were convicted in Whitewater but no idea how many were IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #23

I so can't wait until Skinner nukes this shit from this site. trumad Apr 2016 #25

Relax, trumad, what will be, will be. Take a deep breath. nm floriduck Apr 2016 #36

Let's just ignore FBI investigations into our candidates. That makes sense.... think Apr 2016 #41

.. frylock Apr 2016 #49

I wonder if she will get laundry duty.... grasswire Apr 2016 #63

OTOH, Hillary's sense of entitlement.. grasswire Apr 2016 #109

I was wondering how this case was progressing. Anyone have any idea when IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #22

Any second!!!!! JoePhilly Apr 2016 #27

See post #10. KoKo Apr 2016 #29

You should toss a few more coins in the indictment fairy fountain. JTFrog Apr 2016 #37

See post #35. DOJ's statement clears a couple things up. JudyM Apr 2016 #38

looking like that one might be a tie. In which case, he's hooped. floppyboo Apr 2016 #75

It's starting to smell a lot like Fitzmas. GeorgeGist Apr 2016 #30

Fitzmas was an independent council - this is the FBI. BIG DIFFERENCE!! n/t FourScore Apr 2016 #69

Yes. The FBI can't indict. An independent prosecutor can impanel a grand jury and can. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #74

what a mess. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #56

so she's being federally probed? not security reviewed? wendylaroux Apr 2016 #57

It's been a criminal investigation from day one. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #84

But, "I'm not a crook!" will make one helluva bumper sticker. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #83

Just be patient! The indictment will be released in 24 business hours. tritsofme Apr 2016 #94

it could “reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.” antigop Apr 2016 #95

Ya. Those words were chosen very carefully I'm sure.. think Apr 2016 #96

"don't alert anyone when we send the patrol cars out" IOW? MisterP Apr 2016 #105

yes, what exactly does that mean? nt grasswire Apr 2016 #108

I don't know for sure but it kind of sounds like they are beyond the investigative phase??? nt antigop Apr 2016 #111

okay, run this by and see what you think grasswire Apr 2016 #112

this is what I found and I know nothing about this website, so take it for what it's worth. antigop Apr 2016 #114

veddy interesting. Let's poke around more. nt grasswire Apr 2016 #115

thought you might like to see this if you haven't seen it. antigop Apr 2016 #116

K & R AzDar Apr 2016 #97

I doubt that she will be indicted, but it would be awesome if she were. Vattel Apr 2016 #102

So you think the government will cover up a crime? Threebolo Apr 2016 #117

Hillary should tell them to "cut it out". nt NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #106

Clinton E-Mail Probe Would Be Hurt by a Deadline, Lynch Says antigop Apr 2016 #121