|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:22 PM Original message |
Proposed Colorado Law: Split Electoral College by popular vote: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enki23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. i can't imagine them passing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. 20% of the signatures were republican... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ivan Zero (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not a bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Theirs is not entirely proportional: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prodigal_green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. sounds like one for each house member and the senate evs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yeah, Buffalo in Wyoming get more vote than I do in NC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. interesting "incremental" proposal for change in the Electoral College. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mellowinman (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think this is a terrible idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. A) Fuck what they think B) 20% of the signature were Reps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. must be the humorous side, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 09:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I don't think that they are talking about doing it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. don't some states award electors by congressional district? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 08:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Only Nebraska and Maine (but those rarely split), everyone else is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buycitgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. you're saying those two states split the E vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zidane (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. He is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raiden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Good Idea... But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. Get rid of the Electoral College |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalTechie1337 (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 10:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "any votes over 51% aren't counted in the national total" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Al from WI (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 10:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. What he meant was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zidane (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-01-04 10:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Nor are any under 49% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC