|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:15 PM Original message |
"First time in 135 years that a senior WH official is indicted." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. wow, really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ticapnews (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. It was under US Grant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SupplyConcerns (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
51. I was named after Grant. We can do better this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. Was Libby a higher official than any of the Reagan admin. criminals? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. He must have been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Wasn't Cap Weinberger the Secretary of Defense??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. From Wikipedia, on the Iran-Contra scandal: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Very technically bechloos is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
July (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
57. I heard some news guy describe Libby's THREE jobs: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. And what about Haldeman, etc. during Watergate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Yeah, that statement can't be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Haldeman was Chief of Staff. That's as senior as it gets without being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DelawareValleyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. All three were long gone before indictment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
54. I think they were indicted after Nixon fired them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wasn't Agnew indicted in office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. Begala has certainly grown a set since his days at the awful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. wasn't Agnew indicted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
42. No, I think he resigned first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaintLouisBlues (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not since the U.S. Grant Administration, as per NBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yep. And the implications are immense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yep, yep, yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
44. Didn't he mean a 'cancer on the Presidency' like John Dean said ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
45. Yes he was.. but if they now don't at least elude to the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beltanefauve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 10:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
52. I wonder just how much Wolfie knows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
12. Gawd I hope so! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. Bang the bells 5 times loudly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sepia_steel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yeah baby! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
18. Ding. Ding. Ding. ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats_win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
21. Maybe NBC was wrong? Watergate indictments: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I heard it mentioned that Rove and Cheney might be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleVet (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Had they already resigned before the indictments came out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats_win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. That's right, they resigned before indictements: resigned 8/73 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleVet (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Just checked - looks like they either resigned or got fired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. Key word there..."former" White House aides. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
22. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Don't make me start agreeing with that ass Coulter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:35 AM Response to Reply #25 |
55. This one set of indictments makes it even more difficult... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. I want to emphasize was someone said upthread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. We need some detailed research on various indicted higher-ups... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I think any lurking freepers would be very disappointed to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
47. Yes, but they were all "patriots".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-29-05 06:43 AM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Damn!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian_rd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
27. Forgive us for being disappointed, but the reason is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Why be afraid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
29. The Administration of Accountability has sure covered itself in.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I love the fact that I've heard several people on TV mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. I remember when Bush appeared on the Tonight show... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
34. I'm still laughing. Consume them, good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:55 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. He took off early for Camp David, going to stay there all weekend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Time for a drink is more like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:42 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. You'll find him tomorrow morning........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prescole (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
37. Midterm elections will be crucial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. "... follow the yellow cake road!" hahahahahah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
43. ...but NOT the last. LOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
49. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
53. Oh...my GOD. Imagine if this is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC