loudnclear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:33 PM
Original message |
Why doesn't Hannity talk about the hunter who started one of the CA fires? |
|
I guess people aren't responsible for anything. It all the fault of the trees.
|
denverbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Same reason he doesn't blame Bill Owens for Colorados fires. |
|
He's a completely biased asshole.
|
alphafemale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Guns don't kill people. Trees don't kill people. |
|
Loaded hunters kill people.
|
RebelOne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh no, he said the people that are responsible are the Democrats |
|
because conservationists don't want the trees thinned so that Georgie can give out logging contracts. Hannity said that all the conservationists are Democrats.So because the forests weren't clearcut, that was why there were fires and the Democrats were responsible. I kid you not, I heard that on his radio show Mon.
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Right - Let's check with the NRA to see... |
|
if that asshole is a member.
|
DancingBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You mean you don't know?? |
|
The hunter was shooting at Clinton, who was supposed to be standing by the big tree. Clinton, however, lied and moved to the little tree without telling the hunter, who fired at the big tree, causing the fire.
Clinton's fault. Again.
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. That son of a bitch!!! |
|
Clinton will not get away with this one.
But I bet the liberal media doesn't even report it!!!
|
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Uhh, that was not a tree... |
|
That Clinton was next to. That was his Penis of Evil. ;-)
|
bearfartinthewoods
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but no offense...crap on anyone who tries to make this political.
this year it was a hunter. last year it was a hiker. what the fuck does it matter?
people are dying and losing everything they own and anyone who wants to make this a political "point" today is souless.
|
GregW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. The year before the sharks caused the fires |
|
When they weren't searching for Chandra Leavy that is.
|
NewGuy
(305 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I think it is because the issue is not how the fires were started |
|
Some fires are started each year. Some by lightning, some by arsonists and some by idiots. The issue of clearing trees, underbrush and deadfalls is not related to who starts a fire but to how far and how fast it will spread once lit.
|
bearfartinthewoods
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. i agree and btw...welcome to DU |
|
there are political aspects to this because of the sensitivies on both sides as to how we manage forests. but shame on anyone that tries to make this a 'gotcha' out of it...on either side.
at least while the fires are still burning.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 28th 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |