|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:17 AM Original message |
So Edwards wants Repugs in his cabinet so that he can have people telling him when he's wrong? WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. I thought they weren't supposed to have a place at the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. well actually, John Edwards agrees that he would sit at the table with Corporations...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I guess there are two John Edwards' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. See down thread how I am slimed and attacked because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I didn't "slime you.I was "teasing ' about Coulter.I did tease you about "obsession, but I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 06:01 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Any comparison to Coulter is over the line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I noticed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
33. Gotta admit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Funny how there is never any refutiation of substance on what I post about JE...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
47. That was a long time ago. Why don't you harp on his IWR vote while you're at it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. What was a long time ago.....his December 3rd 2007 statement??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. November 29, not December 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. December 4, 2007 is soooo long ago! How dare I? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. Recycling an old story again? Don't you have anything better to do? You really have an obsession |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I could have said the same about you re Hillary Clinton but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Why? Cause I dare bring up the hypocrisy in folks attempting to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I have NEVER torn Obama down. And you have constantly attacked Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 06:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. The point is that you don't have the fortitude to ask others who post negatively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. And that is completely untrue! I have defended Obama many times as well as Biden and Kucinich . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
48. I notice that Hillary didn't make the cut as to whom you "defend" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. I specifically mentioned that I HAVE defended Hillary and never posted a negative thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
41. You tell 'em Frenchie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. How come I don't see you in this ops complaining? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. you noticed that too? The spin + obsession is pretty sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. "old"? the link says 12/31/07. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
56. Read further, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
55. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Deleted message |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 05:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Why are you not asking these folks if Obama killed their daddies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
16. Guess he's trying to outdo Obama...who announced he wanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
18. Two promininate Republicians were in the Clinton Administration. David Gergen and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThatPoetGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. Obama also said he wants Republicans in his cabinet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:49 AM Response to Reply #19 |
28. Obama didn't make a big deal of saying he'd exclude corporations and lobbyists and their reps from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. Now you did it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
20. I'm going to go out on a limb here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressive_realist (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
21. Maybe in an inverse manner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
22. If you don't get it, you're incompetant. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:48 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. you spelled 'incompetent' incorrectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
23. Republicans who are independent minded? Good luck. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
24. He's a DLC Triangulator wannabe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. he's the DLC faux progressive ringer candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
25. If true...I admire Edwards for his Bipartisanship... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ineedchange (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
29. He Won't Be the First President to Have Members of the other Party on his Cabinet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
30. Mr Hedgefund and BO can fight over Schwarzenegger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Lessee, we almost have our first primary over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
35. Other Democratic Presidents have done the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Since some of you are for the idea of Obama using lobbyists... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
60. I said nothing about Obama using lobbyists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. So why do you think that folks are these boards are Dying because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
61. There's no double standard on my part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
39. The silence among anti-Obama Edwards supporters shows their hypocrisy. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
40. Edwards has been "wrong" so often that they should be busy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
43. I could tell him he's wrong without being on the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. The main point in that quote is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
45. President Clinton had Republicans giving advice .. was that bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. The best republic president we've ever had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
46. I can't believe you actually repeated this POS post as a new thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. I'm not here to accomodate your beliefs...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Deleted message |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. I think that you are obsessed with FrenchieCat...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. That does it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. If you do not like someone, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-03-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
52. WTF? I thought there was no room at the table and that they'd eat all the food? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 25th 2024, 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC