|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:01 AM Original message |
By the way, No one is looking to get "gay married". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Thank you. The issue is *marriage equality* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. I hate seeing the phrase "gay rights" too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. rec'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
3. "marriage" is religious bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's a non-starter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. until the line between 'god's marriage' and 'legal marriage' gets unblurred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I understand your point and agree, but its still a non-starter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I agree that it's a constitutional issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. The court can't tell a church to marry straight people, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. you're missing what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 02:23 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I think our disagreement boils down to this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 03:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Well put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhollyHeretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. No it's not. It is a civil contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. pay attention to the people opposed to gay marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhollyHeretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. There is no way you could get rid of marriage. In the bigots mind it would be proof that gays were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I never said to get rid of marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 01:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
16. No it should not be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 02:07 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. you've got it backwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 02:21 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. No I do not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 03:11 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. 0.0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captiosus (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 03:22 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. You do have it wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 03:24 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Yes, religious predates state. Sort of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Idealism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. There are many words for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SweetieD (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-07-08 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
25. There has never been a categorical right for a person to enter into any type of contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC