December 8, 2008
Mr. Tom Daschle
Secretary-designate, Health and Human Services
Transition Health Policy Team
Washington, DC
Dear Mr. Daschle,
Physicians for a National Health Program respectfully requests an opportunity for one or more of
our members to meet with your health policy team to make the case for the swift enactment of a
single-payer national health insurance plan (as embodied in the U.S. National Health Insurance
Act, H.R. 676, which currently has the support of over 90 member of Congress) on a medical,
moral and economic basis.
Candidly, we are alarmed by some comments by members of the Senate and by the Obama
transition team that suggest that the single-payer option is being excluded from consideration —
is “off the table” — in the health reform debate. We believe single payer is not only the best
solution, but the only effective solution to our health care crisis.
Single-payer health reform, sometimes characterized as an improved “Medicare for All,” is the
only reform model that offers $400 billion in annual savings in administrative costs. It is the only
approach that contains effective cost-containment provisions, such as bulk purchasing and global
budgeting. Such economies would allow for expanding health coverage to everyone — with no
co-pays or deductibles — with no overall increase in health care spending.
The single-payer model is the only fiscally prudent proposal available, an especially important
consideration at a time of economic distress. By basing itself (and improving upon) Medicare, it
presents itself as a uniquely American way of guaranteeing care to all who need it. Such an
approach has repeatedly proven its effectiveness.
With a single-payer national health insurance program we can assure lifelong, high quality,
comprehensive and affordable coverage for everyone. Such a program will lift the heavy burden
of crushing medical expenses off the shoulders of our population, expenses that often lead to
personal bankruptcy. And we can save lives: the Institute of Medicine estimates that more than
18,000 Americans die each year from lack of health insurance.
The proposals made to date by Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), like those associated with Sen.
Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and President-elect Barack Obama, share the fatal flaw of
preserving a central role for the investor-owned health insurance industry in a private-public
financing mix. This approach simply won’t work, as numerous state-based experiments patterned
after this model have shown. These plans always fail because they are unable to control costs.
In sum, from the standpoint of what benefits our patients, single payer is the health policy model
that best reflects their needs and values.
Support for single payer is extensive. In a peer-reviewed statistical study in the Annals of
Internal Medicine, 59 percent of U.S. physicians said they would support government action to
establish national health insurance. In a recent Associated Press poll, 65 percent of the
respondents said, “The United State should adopt a universal health insurance program in which
everyone is covered under a program like Medicare that is run by the government and financed
by taxes.”
In addition, over 480 labor organizations, including 39 state federations of the AFL-CIO, have
endorsed single payer legislation, as have numerous professional associations, city and state
governments, and religious denominations.
We therefore expect that single-payer proponents will be invited to testify before the Committee
and we look forward to your affirmative response. You can telephone me at (312) 782-6006 or
reach me via e-mail at info@pnhp.org.
Sincerely,
Quentin Young, MD, MACP
National Coordinator
Physicians for a National Health Program
29 E. Madison St., Suite 600
Chicago, IL 60602
(312) 782-6006
www.pnhp.org
http://www.pnhp.org/change/Daschle_Letter.pdfMods. I took this from a section of their website they put up for everyone to use so it should be okay to print the whole letter.
"You can draw upon special Talking Points and other materials here for meetings with members of Congress, at community forums, and in letters to the editor."