|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:16 AM Original message |
Blowing a hole in the "WE DON'T HAVE THE VOTES" excuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost4words (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. correct you are! Impeach the little sissy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
112. wanna veto us Mr Bush? have a subpoena !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Good post -- the "we don't have the votes" cry is lame... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
50. You nailed it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
114. Fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #114 |
121. he's been doing that anyways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Jefferson_24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #114 |
123. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
3. Agreed - the smirk would make it all worthwhile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
20. You know putting Bush under oath will give them the rest of the votes. You know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPettus (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 03:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
98. You think he's smirking now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #98 |
116. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. The House has the votes to impeach. It only takes a simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
62. have you counted the votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I disagree...Impeachment is ludicrous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 08:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. "Impeachment is ludicrous" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Hi BigRed1975!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Thanks for the welcome... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. sure... if by "ludicrous" you mean "imperative". . . . . . .n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Nope...I mean as in superfluous..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. What is ludicrous is ignoring the criminal behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Why not censure instead of impeach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Get back to me when a Republican rep gets the same kind of pressure.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. HE IS A FUCKING CRIMINAL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. You really more concerned about revenge than justice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. I wonder if the republicans asked that question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. I am sure they didn't..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
79. Deleted message |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #34 |
95. read the definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #95 |
103. while i absolutely support impeachment, it would be wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #103 |
105. agreed - to a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 09:06 AM Response to Reply #34 |
107. Maybe we should at least try. It is better than what this congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. We don't give a FUCK about what repug reps get pressured on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. IF you want to get into a profanity contest.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Hoo Boy!! An internet tough guy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. OK. I've got a 50. on you to rip Mr/Ms "Bitch-Slap's" head off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. LOL! Thanks for the vote of confidence. I just *love* keyboard commandos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. i want in on that action...$50.00 on GITM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
61. Deleted message |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. LOL!! Didn't *you* start with the threats? I thought it was funny, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #47 |
104. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
78. So what do you call the repuke's impeachment of Clinton? He had 60% approval during the whole thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
87. The ONLY reason that the repubs were "rewarded" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. "It will largely be viewed by the public" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. Not a pundit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. Why do you think he can't be removed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I'll answer each of your questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
59. How about these things, for an example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #39 |
108. That's the pug side of impeachment inaction yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
65. he can't be removed because the repubs will never vote to remove him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. My analysis would be a little different than what you are saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
86. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. from the outset, there was broad bi-partisan support for a nixon impeachment inquiry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
56. "Opinion" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:35 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Impeachment was designed to be a political process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #63 |
71. While you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #71 |
126. I think it's the old "I'll know it when I see it" answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #63 |
119. A legal tool to check politics gone amok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #63 |
120. A legal tool to check politics gone amok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
80. We do know how to recognize trolls, however... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 07:06 AM Response to Reply #26 |
102. KKKarl, is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 09:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
110. They still don't get it, do they... They were looked on by the public as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. Last time there was an impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. It's about doing what is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It's a no-brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. If I hear one more person say "it's about the numbers" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
44. Don't forget the nearly 3,000 killed on 9/11 -- and how many dead in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. I think they are included in the count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
92. Plus how many in New Orleans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #92 |
118. Right -- and, yes, we've "jumped the shark" in more ways than one. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Golden Raisin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
85. Yes! And I doubt they are accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Actually the Cons did pay the price... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Comparing with Clinton is Oxymoronic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigRed1975 (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. That is extremely tortured reasoning.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
58. Ummmm... we were at war when they voted to impeach Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
70. Welcome To DU BigRed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
82. ahh - "pre 911 mindset" - another repuke talking point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 03:38 AM Response to Reply #40 |
99. Extremely tortured? -- As opposed to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
81. ahh - now it's the "left wing" of the party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
127. History lesson is in order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
54. "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
125. No reply to this or to magellan's reply? What a surprise. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
67. Thanks Big Red, and.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
76. Vot a bonch off booolcheat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
77. "Congress is not responsible for enforcing or interpreting the laws of this country." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
94. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #6 |
115. I see NewYawker already welcomed you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
klyon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. That is right. To serve justice we need to begin the process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
64. impeachment is both a legal process and a political process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. I was very willing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #72 |
90. inartfully worded on my part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. I want the government to get something done constructive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. bringing impeachment to the floor of the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pberq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
33. Yes, let the national debate begin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Do you ever wonder if we would be where we are today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
43. we'd be right where we are now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elana i am (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
15. IMO it's even more simple than that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
16. Because the "can't win; won't fight" excuse. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
17. AMEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
29. Here are the "numbers" our chicken shit Dems to be reminded of: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
42. Kicked and Recommended! It's NOT about the votes, or even if it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
45. All the while the world is watching IMPEACH NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
49. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
52. I am an impeachment hawk. I K&R this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
55. 50% in the House is all you need to Impeach and send it to the Senate for trial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #55 |
66. I doubt we have the votes in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-21-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #66 |
128. Has it occurred to you that we might not have 18 months? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
watrwefitinfor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
60. There is one big reason to support impeachment of this regime that I never see mentioned anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #60 |
68. Right ya are "This country needs an impeachment" if after their crimes are exposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #60 |
73. Not only will people today learn how evil and corrupt Bush has been, but also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
84. Thank you. YOU get it. If for no other reasons THAT is the the reason we MUST do it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
93. YES! I wish I could make a separate recommendation for this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No DUplicitous DUpe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 01:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
96. I Agree! Very well stated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
75. They say Impeachment would tear the country apart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
83. best post and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
88. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Time for change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
89. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 03:18 AM Response to Original message |
97. k+r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
100. just asking..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
101. Also, it is ours to lose when it comes to the 2008 presidential election too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98296 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
106. How can we vote them out -- they are doing little/nothing about election fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
109. As far as I'm concerned.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
111. Good Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
113. Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
117. Agreed. Investigate, then impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
124. Becuase they get many shots at this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC