Reply #78: That isn't what I'm getting at... [View All]

[youspeakmylanguage]

...sorry if that wasn't clear. I was reinforcing your point that certain groups wear provocative shirts for the expressed purpose of "baiting" someone. This company that operates through CafePress states that openly. This is completely different from wearing an article of clothing as part of your religious faith and having a 2nd party, who is predisposed to feel and act negatively towards people of your religion, attacking you for doing so.

My point is that it would not be ok for me, as a "liberal", to throw coffee in someone's face for wearing one of these shirts, even if they are "baiting" me to take some sort of retaliatory action.