Reply #333: Oh, he's already suggested remedy there [View All]

[alcibiades_mystery]

In a brand new precedent, the land should be deeded over to the state (or the court, or a third party, please dear God anyone but the El Salvadorans!), who would then sell it, then transfer the proceeds to the plaintiffs. This is, of course, a monumental shift in the original position that the plaintiffs should have no standing in civil court full stop! Needless to say, there is no reason that the plaintiffs should need some third party to administer their property, but Myth just doesn't "like" that they get LAND...land, I say!...so we should invent a completely unheard of method of transferring property, specifically for these two plaintiffs, and involve a third party administrator, just so that the plaintiffs get MONEY, but not LAND! A more incoherent and ignorant collection of drivel I have never seen, but it's quite clear that Myth operates through some weird LAND fetishization that has zero basis in logic, property law, or reason.