You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #142: Yup, I agree--the wording is weird. Why does he have to spell out [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #130
142. Yup, I agree--the wording is weird. Why does he have to spell out
"bathroom break"? Why not just, "I need a break"? And why put a question mark at the end? Makes me think it's code. I'd sure like to know who was speaking at the time, and what happened next. Or maybe the question is: Who was ABOUT TO speak? Is Bush saying, "If so and so's up next, then don't I need a 'bathroom break' (excuse to leave the room)?" If Bush weren't such a lamebrain (and basket case), I'd be convinced it was code. But, given that it's Bush, who knows?

But I still think the startling things are that this photo got taken at all, and that Reuters published it. You just DON'T DO that to world leaders! For a reputable news organization to do it, it's like a declaration of war--or, in this case, a response to the Bush Cartel's war against Reuters. (I don't know the current death toll for Reuters' journalists in Iraq, but I know they've been hardest hit, in some really questionable killings, starting with the initial targeting of the Reuters floor in the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad early in the invasion.)

I also think that things like this don't just "happen" to presidents--not in a highly controlled situation like this one. Maybe a slipup on the campaign trail, that sort of thing, where happenstance can occur (somebody leaves the mike "on" by accident)--but not a highly managed UN appearance, and especially given this excessively managed presidency. How did Karl Rove, and/or Secret Service, and/or private Cartel security, and/or UN security, LET a reporter get that angle, that position, for a photo--behind him, over his shoulder? A behind the prez photo is rare. (Didn't they ban them in the debate rules? --and the "wire" on his back photo was against the rules, or something? I dimly remember that.)

Was it just Rick Wilking's (the photog's) lucky day? Right place, right time? Or is somebody SETTING THINGS UP to harm Bush's public image? (--the guitar photo op, the birthday cake photo op, while a large chunk of the US was getting blown off the map and thousands of American were dying; the cardboard "rescue center"; and this humiliation ("Can I go to the bathroom?") at a UN world conference. (It even makes me wonder about "My Pet Goat"--in retrospect.)

(I sometimes think that it is we, the American people, who are being psyopped--insulted, humiliated, given a low self-image, deliberately, by Bush's idiocy and blunders. Somebody shoving it in our faces. How dare you think you deserve any better than this inarticulete, drooling S.O.B.? It's a torture technique.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC