You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: So, what evidence did they have against him? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, what evidence did they have against him?
Other than the fact that he's of the BROWNISH persuasion, that is...

I mean, we've got a Hispanic "former gang member",
and we're supposed to believe he's suddenly
working for Al-quaida, planning political bombings...
How the hell does that work?

The whole thing STINKS,
and given B*shCabal™s track record
of locking up phoney terrorists,
they should be forced to put up or shut up.

SHOW US SOME EVIDENCE IN A REAL COURT OF LAW,
OR LET THIS MAN GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC