You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: It's 6 minutes per hour. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. It's 6 minutes per hour.
Not nearly enough, really.

I'm just opposed to restroom quotas as a matter of principle; it takes as much time as it takes.

I'd like to point out that, were they going to fully enforce this, they would have to actually control what their employees eat when they're off company property, and when they eat it. Not realistic in the least.

Then there's the Weyland Corporation, I think it was, which told its employees that if they smoke, they're fired. Even if they do it at home and not at work. The reasoning was healthcare costs, but I can easily see an employer using that as a precedent to tell their employees what they can, and when, because going to the bathroom harms production.

I tried to find an article on that and I couldn't, but I think it may have been discussed here at DU when it happened.

No, I'm not trying to be funny. I honestly can see that happening, because of what the Weyland Corp. got away with. The corporate foot is now in the door to be able to control your life and the way you live it in order to even have a job.

Eat fast food? It causes bowel cramps and more frequent bathroom breaks; anyone seen eating or known to eat fast food will be terminated. Drink lots of water? No water bottles allowed on the workfloor, and doing so results in automatic termination. Drink coffee at home before work? Coffee is a diuretic; you can't have your morning coffe anymore, and we will be administering periodic, random drug screens to test for nicotine, additives used in fast foods, caffeine, and other, illegal drugs as a condition of your continued employment. Failure to voluntarily participate in such screenings shall constitute resignation-at-will, and shall not be subject to an in-house appeal.

Am I the only one who thinks it could go there? I hope not.....

We need to end corporate personhood so corporations cannot do such things to us anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC