Reply #46: really [View All]

[still_one]

he has no problem with prayer in schools, or for that matter he walks a thin line between seperation of church and state

he has no problem with the IRAQ war

he has no problem with sending women who have been raped, sent to a hospital, if that hospital does NOT believe in birth control, and will NOT allow that woman to be treated with the morning after pill, to be sent to another hospital. Hospitals are either open to treat the PUBLIC aren't they

he has no problem with the judges bush has thrown at the court

I can go on, but if you are going to name a few social issues to defend that prick, it doesn't cut it with me.

He was one of the biggest proponents on this IRAQ WAR LIE, and will NOT admit it was wrong.

If you think he represents what the democratic party is, then you and I have different views

The person he replaced, wicker stood for more democratic principles today than liberman ever did

Incidently, the war in IRAQ IS A PRETTY IMPORTANT ISSUE TO DISAGREE WITH BUSH ON. I am doing everything in my power to see Ned Lamont gets nominated.

Democrats should stand for some basic principles, and especially after what has been reveled about Iraq, anyone who still supports this outrage should go to the other side